Circle wise list of farmers who have submitted objections against the ...

Circle wise list of farmers who have submitted objections against the Final Lists, under NationalMission on Saffron, 2012-13.Circle: DrangbalS.No123456Name of the Farmer withparentageGh Ahmad Malik S/O Ab RazaqMalikHaleema W/O Bashir AhmadBhatMohd Ashraf Bhat S/O BashirAhmad BhatAb Rashid Mir S/O; Gh HassanMirMohd Rajab Mir S/O; Ab AhadMirFarooq Ahmad Bhat S/O Sonaul-lahBhatResidenceDrangbalKhankhabaghKhankhabaghFrestabalDrangbalKhankhabagh7 Ab Gani Bhat S/O Gh Mohd Khankhabagh89101112Gh Qadir Khanday S/o: Ab AzizKhandayGh Nabi Bhat S/O Gh RasoolBhatBasher Ahmad S/O Ali Mohd &Fazi D/O Mohd IsmailArshad Ahmad Bhat S/O; MohdRajab Bhat .Gh Rasool Bhat S/O MohdIsmailFrestabalDrangbalKhankhabaghKhankhabaghDrangbalNature ofobjectionRejuvenated Area 3K,but skipped inpublished listRejuvenated Area16M, but skipped inpublished listRejuvenated Area 3K4M, but skipped inpublished listCorrection In A/CNo.Correction In A/CNo.Published 14Minstead of 1 KanalCorrection InParentage2K 3M publishedinstead of 3K 3M1K 6M publishedinstead of 1K 17M2 Marls publishedless In Each CaseCorrection In Surname9 Marlaspublished lessarea.Reply of circleofficer/Verification committeeThe names of the beneficiarieshave skipped at the time offraming of the initial registration.The beneficiaries have rejuvenatedas per the guidelines undermission and hence were notincluded while finalising thepublished list.Correction in the A/C No.recommendedCorrection in the A/C No.recommendedGraded Seed Was Available ForLess Area (14M only)Recommended parentagecorrection.Graded Seed was Available ForApproved Area 2K 3M only.Graded seed was available forapproved area 1k 6m.Graded Seed Was available for1k 8mand 15m respectivelyCorrection in Sur namerecommended Mir instead ofBhatGraded seed was available for2K only.Report of securitizingcommitteeThe claim appears to be genuineand approval may be accordedfor drawal of payments.A/C No. CorrectedA/C No. CorrectedClaim rejectedParentage CorrectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedSur name to be corrected afterverifying the revenue record bySDAO Tral.Claim rejected.Status of thecaseOn therecommendationof thecommittee theclaim may beentertained afterfulfilment of allcodal formalitiesCorrectedCorrectedDisposedCorrectedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposed13 Shafiq Ahmad Bhat S/O; Lt Gh Khankhabagh Khasra Farmer has not rejuvenated the area Claim rejected Disposed

14Mohd No.2613,1k 6.5mnot included.Mst Rehti D/O Mohd RamzanMirDrangbal15 Ali Mohd Bhat S/O Reshi Bhat Frestabal16Ab Rahim Bhat S/O Lt NabirBhatFrestabalCorrection InSurvey No8M publishedinstead of 18M2K 2M publishedinstead of 2K12Munder Khasra No.2613 and hence notincorporated. Approved area only13M.Khasra No. 223 is corrected asper the revenue recordavailable to this office.Graded seed was available for8M only.Graded seed was available for2K 2M.onlyThe Khasra No. be correctedafter authentication fromconcerned revenue authoritiesat SDAO office TralClaim rejectedClaim rejectedDisposedDisposedDisposedChief Agriculture OfficerPulwama

Circle : Wuyen BS.No12345Name of the Applicantwith parentageMushtaq Ahmad Bhat S/OHabib Ul lah BhatMohd Ramzan Bhat S/O AbRehmanMod Maqbool Bhat S/O GhHassan BhatGulshana Akhter D/O AbRahim KhandayMst Jana D/O Gh Mohi Ud DinLoneResidenceWuyenWuyen BalaWuyen BalaWuyenAndroosa6 Gh Hassan Rather S/O Ab Satar Munpora78Nazir Ahmad Bhat S/O GhAhmad BhatHabib-Ul-lah Sheikh S/O MohdSultanS.M. AbadS.M Abad9 Hajra D/O Wali Mohd Bhat S.M Abad1011Bilal Ahmad & Reyaz AhmadDar S’s/o: Gh Mohi Ud Din DarAli Mohd Sheikh S/O Lt MohdShabanS.M AbadS.M AbadNature of objectionName Does NotExist In The FinalList1K 3M publishedinstead of 2K 6M1K 10M publishedinstead of 2KPayment beStopped .ToS. No.1562K publishedinstead of 3K1K 6M publishedinstead of 2KName Missing InThe Final List2K publishedinstead of 3K 8M3K 5M publishedinstead of 6K1K 16M publishedinstead of 2K 10M2K 15M publishedinstead of 3K 18MReply of circleofficer/Verification committeeSowing has not been doneunder staff supervision.The famer had registered for 1K3M only.10M deduction was done due to25% under sized corms.There is a family dispute and thecase is sub-judice hencePayment be Stopped.Curtailment of 1K due to undersize corms.Revenue authorities haveverified only 1K 6K, the samehave been publishedSowing has not been doneunder the staff supervision.20% Curtailment to rejuvenatedarea of 3K by the VerificationCommittee.The farmer actually rejuvenatedan area of 3K 7M instead ofregistered 6k. 2m deducted byverification committee.Revenue record /actualmeasurement is only for 36Marlas.Undersized seed to the extent of 30%observed hence curtailment for 15M wasdone to rejuvenated are of 3K 10M.Report of securitizing committeeClaim rejected.Claim rejected.Claim rejectedPayment stopped as per thecircle officer’s report.Claim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedDeduction justified, hence claimrejected.Claim rejectedClaim rejectedStatus ofthe caseDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposed

12 Ab Aziz Sheikh S/O Asadullah Wuyen Surname Correction13 Mst Azi D/O Lassa Bhat S.M Abad14 Gh Qadir s/o Rajab Bhat S.M Abad15 Ab Salam Bhat S/O Fayaz S.M Abad1617Khati Begam D/O Gh QadirBhatGh Mohi Ud Din Teli S/OAssad-ul-lah TeliS.M AbadS.M Abad18 Mst Rehti D/O Munawar Teli S.M Abad19202122Gh Mohd Sheikh S/o: AbSamadFayaz Ahmad Bhat S/O MohdSubhanManzoor Ahmad Bhat s/oMohd sultanMohd Akram s/o; KhalilRatherS.M AbadS.M AbadS.M AbadS.M Abad23 Asadulla Lone S/o: Rehman Androosa1K 18M publishedinstead of 2K 10M3K publishedinstead of 6K2K 18M publishedinstead of 3K 18M1K 10M publishedinstead of 2K 1M2K publishedinstead of 4K2K 10M publishedinstead of 3K 10M5K publishedinstead of 8K15 Marlas instead of2 Kanals2K 10 M publishedinstead of 3 K2K 14M publishedinstead of 7K 18M4K publishedinstead of 10KAs per The Revenue Record Thename of The beneficiary Is AzizBhat not Aziz Shiekh.Revenue Record Is only for 1K18M.The corms to the extent of 25%were under sized accordinglythe proportionate area of 1K hasbeen deducted from the 4Krejuvenated area.25% undersized seed andaccordingly proportionate areaof 1K has been deducted out of3K 18M rejuvenated.11M has been deducted due tounder size corms.Area rejuvenation under thesupervision of staff is 3K 12Mand the curtailment of 1K 12Mdue to undersized corms anddeviation from the guidelines.Actual rejuvenated/measuredarea is 2K 18M, deduction of 8Mdue To Undersized CormsOnly 5K rejuvenated undersupervision of the staff.Revenue record shows only 15Mas a share of applicant.Area rejuvenated 2K 18M,deduction of 8M has been madeon the basis of under sizedcorms.2K 14M land rejuvenated underfield staff supervision.Area rejuvenated 5K 5M,Curtailment of 1K 5M out of 5K 5MClaim not justified the name ofFamer is Aziz Bhat Not AzizShiekh.Claim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejected.Claim rejected.Claim rejected.Claim rejectedClaim rejected.Claim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejected.Claim rejected.DisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposed

242526Arshad Ahmad Bhat S/O MohdShabanMohd Yusuf Ganie S/O MohdShabanMohd Akram Bhat S/O; MohdBhatAndroosaS.M AbadWuyenCorrection In TheName1K publishedinstead of 2KName Does NotExist In The FinalListon the basis 25% under sized corms.Correction recommended by theCircle Officer50% seed was undersized Hencecurtailment was doneaccordingly.Plot has been rejected by theverification committee on thebasis of deviations of guidelines.Correction be done afterverifying the revenue record bythe SDAO Concerned.Claim rejectedClaim rejectedDisposedDisposedDisposedChief Agriculture OfficerPulwama

Circle: ChandharaS.No1234Name of the Applicant withparentage.Ab Ahad Bhat s/o; Gh AhmadBhatMohd Ramzan Ganaie S/O AbAhad GanieNazir Ahmad Rather S/o MohdRamzan RatherShaban Sheikh S/o RehmanSheikhResidenceChandharaChandharaChandharaChandhara5 Zeba w/o Ah Ahmad rather Chandhara6Ab Hamid Ganaie S/o MohdSubhan GanaieChandhara7 Mohd Sultan Dar S/o Gani Dar Chandhara891011Mohd Amin Dar S/o Ali MohdDarJavid Ahmad Ganaie S/O; GhAhmad GanaieGh Ahmad Ganaie S/o; AbAhad GanaieAb Hamid Ganaie S/o; GhAhmad GanaieChandharaChandharaChandharaChandharaNature of objectionInstead of 14K10M, only 10Kshown in the listLess area shownCorrection in theparentageCorrection in theparentageCorrection in theAC No.Khasra No 1379.MissingLees area shown inthe listCorrection inparentageLess area shownLess area shownLess area shownReply of circleofficer/Verification committeeFarmer has withdrawn theapplication.Farmer has withdrawn theapplicationRecommended by the circleofficerRecommended by the circleofficerRecommended by the circleofficerKhasra No.1379 covering anarea of 1k 18m Skippedalthough rejuvenated as perguidelines and the inputs standissued/utilized. Hence the samemay be incorporated. Thereport of Panchayat body is alsoappendedFarmer has withdrawn theApplication.Recommended by the circleofficerFarmer has withdrawn theapplicationFarmer has withdrawn theapplicationFarmer has withdrawn theapplicationReport of securitizingcommitteeWithdrawnWithdrawnParentage be corrected bySDAO Concerned afterverifying the revenue records.Parentage be corrected bySDAO Concerned afterverifying the revenue records.Correction as SB 5945PNBPampore.In light of the records, thecommittee recommends forinclusion of the area under kh.1379which is 1k 18m .WithdrawnParentage be corrected bySDAO Concerned afterverifying the revenue records.WithdrawnWithdrawnWithdrawnStatus of the caseDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedApproved as pertherecommendationof thecommittee afterfulfilment of allcodal formalities.DisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposed

121314Mst Khati W/o; Gh MohdRatherNazir Ahmad Dar S/o: Habib ulDarImtiyaz Ahmad Ganie S/o;Feroz Ahmad GanaieChandharaChandharaChandharaPayment may bestopped.3K 5M publishedinstead of 4K 10MCorrection in thename15 Mohd Maqbool Shiekh Chandhara Less area shown1617Ab Aziz Ganaie S/o: Habib Ullah GanaieGh Mohd Rather S/o; MohdRamzan RatherChandharaChandhara18 A b Rashid Mir S/o Ahad Mir Chandhara1920212223Ali Mohd Teli S/o: Ab AhadTeliBashir Ahmad Akhoon S/o;Sana ul lah AkhoonNazir Ahmad Ganaie S/o; AmaGanaieGh Mohd Shah S/o; Habib-ullahShahAb Rashid Ganaie s/o; ABAhad GanaieChandharaChandharaChandharaChandharaChandhara10M publishedinstead of 3K 10MCorrection in thenameName does notexist in the list17M publishedinstead of 1KCorrection inParentageLess area shown1K publishedinstead of 1K 17MCorrection inparentagePayment stopped till familydispute settled.Farmer has rej. 4K 10M but 30%seed was undersized as such thededuction was made.Recommended by the circleofficerFarmer has withdrawn theapplicationRevenue authorities have onlyverified only 10M.Recommended by the circleofficerThe farmer was registered buthas not rejuvenated under thenorms of the Mission.Farmer has rej. 1K but 15% seedwas undersized as such thededuction was made.Recommended by the circleofficer.Farmer has withdrawn theapplication.The plant geometry/corm sizewas not found as per.specification .Hence 17M havebeen deducted by the fieldofficers and endorsed by theverification committee.Recommended by the circleofficerThe case needs clearance fromthe revenue authorities. Tillthen payment is with held.Claim rejected.Name be corrected afterverifying the revenue recordsat concerned SDAO level.WithdrawnClaim rejectedName be corrected by SDAOConcerned after verifying therevenue records.Claim rejectedClaim rejectedParentage be corrected bySDAO Concerned afterverifying the revenue records.WithdrawnClaim rejected.Name be corrected by SDAOConcerned after verifying therevenue records.DisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposed

24 Zooni W/o Bashir Ahmad Chandhara2526Gh Mohi ud din Rather S/o; AbGani RatherFeroza Jan D/o; Gh NabiGanaieChandharaChandhara27 Ashia D/o; Gh Nabi Ganaie Chandhara2829Fayaz Ahmad Ganaie S/o; GhNabi GanaieMohd Maqbool Ganaie S/o;Ab Aziz GanaieChandharaChandhara30 Mohd Sultan Dar Chandhara14 M publishedinstead of 1K1K 5M publishedinstead of 3K 11MCorrection inparentageCorrection inparentageCorrection in ACNo.Correction in ACNo.Correction in ACNo.Farmer has rejuvenated 14Mbut 30% seed was undersized assuch the deduction was made.Only 1K 5M rejuvenated as perthe recommendations.Recommended by the circleofficerRecommended by the circleofficerRecommended by the circleofficerRecommended by the circleofficerRecommended by the circleofficerClaim rejected.Claim rejected.Parentage to be corrected bySDAO Concerned afterverifying the revenue records.Parentage to be corrected bySDAO Concerned afterverifying the revenue records.Ac. No. Corrected as SB2043JKB Pamp.Ac. No. Corrected as SB 9258JKB Pamp.Ac. No. Corrected as SB21583JKB Main Pamp.DisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedChief Agriculture OfficerPulwama

Circle: Wuyen A.S.No12345678Name of the Farmer withparentageAli Mohd Khanday S/o: AbRazaq Khanday.Gh Nabi Sofi S/O; Sana-ul-laSofiNora Wd/O Mohd JabarMoongoGh Mohd Bhat S/O; QadirBhatAb Khaliq Malla S/O; GhMohd MallaGulshan W/O; Feroz AhmadKhanZahoor Ahmad Joo S/O; AbKhaliqGh Mohd Ganaie S/O; AbAziz GanieResidenceWuyenWuyenWuyenWuyenNature ofobjectionStop payment toAli MohdKhanday s/oIsmail KhandayName does notexist in the list2K publishedinstead of 2K14MName does notexist in the listReply of circle officer/VerificationcommitteeRegarding the disputed KhasraNos.203,205 as reflected by theapplicant, report given by thecircle officer is as : Khasra No.203as per the records available andreport of concerned Patwaribelongs to Ali Mohd Khanday s/o;Ismail Khanday not to theapplicant. Hence objection withregard to Khasra No.205 belongsto the applicant against which nopayment has been claimed.Figuring at Sr. No.192 of the finallist published.Only 2K rejuvenated under theStaff supervision.Family dispute /payment stoppedReport of verificationcommitteePayment stopped till theparties get clarify thematter from revenueauthorities.Claim rejected.Claim rejected.Pending till the disputeis settled by the revenueauthorities by theapplicants.Status ofthe caseDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedWuyen Less area Farmer has withdrawn the Claim Withdrawn DisposedRam baghWuyenWuyenLess area shownin the listLess area shownin the listLess area shownin the listFarmer has withdrawn the ClaimFarmer has withdrawn the ClaimRevenue record available only for1k 12m Insisted of 2K.WithdrawnWithdrawnWithdrawnDisposedDisposedDisposed

910Gh Mohi Ud Din Joo S/O; GhRasool JooShameema D/o: Ab SalamDarziWuyenWuyenCorrection in thename5K 13Mpublishedinstead of 7K10MRecommended by the circle officer Name corrected.Report of Circle officer notsatisfactory.The report of circleofficer ambiguous thefarmer has actuallyrejuvenated 5k 13mwhich has been verifiedand published. Henceclaim rejected. FurtherCAO Pulwama isrequested thatconcerned circle officermay be put to task forputting such reports.DisposedDisposedChief Agriculture OfficerPulwama

Circle: Konibal BS.No1.2.3.4.5.6.7.Name of the Farmerwith parentageGh Mohd Syed S/o PeerQamar ud din syedHabib ul Ganaie S/o AbSamad GanaieJana Begum D/o Ab AhadGanaieMst Raja D/O KarimGanaieGh Nabi Bhat S/o AbAhad BhatGh Mohi ud din Dar S/oGh Qadir DarGh Nabi Bhat S/o GhMohd BhatResidenceDusooNature of objectionPublished area 3KClaimed Area: 5KClaim Less Area by 2kReply of circle officer/verification committeeArea verified is only 3K,deduction on the basis of poorplant geometry and under sizeseeds.Gundbal Name does not exist in the list Name does not exist in the list.GundbalGundbalKh No.1613 Missing for an area of1k 14Mbeneficiary registered under FormNo.3876 has been listed as Mst RajaW/o Karim Ganie instead D/o KarimGanieChandhara Name missing in the final listChandhara Khasra No. Missing of 2kKrinchooChange of Khasra no from 1477 to1277Name of the beneficiary exists atSr No.51 in the final listRecommended by the circleofficer kindly read Mst Raja D/oKarim GanieRecommended by the circleofficerActually registration is only for1KRecommended by the circleofficerReport of securitizingcommitteeclaim rejectedThe beneficiaryexists at Sr. No.36 inthe published finallist for an area of15M only .The Missing Kh. No1613 as claimed bythe beneficiary isincluded in thepublished list.The Correction maybe made at SDAOoffice concernedafter verifyingrevenue records.The registrationform could not betraced ,claimrejectedClaim rejectedKhasra no. may beCorrected at SDAOoffice concernedfrom 1477 to 1277Status ofthe caseDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedAccepted

8.9.10.11.Wali Mohd Ganaie s/oAb Rehman GanaieMst Fazi D/o SultanGanaieNaza Akhter D/o MohdSultan DarMst Rehti D/o SultanBalaChandhara Name missingName existing at Sr. No.81Gundbal Name missing Name existing at Sr. No.26Chandhara Name does not exist in publication.Dusoo2k Shown in publication Instead Of4K12. Ama Bala S/o Rasool Bala Dusoo 1k 4M published Instead Of 2K 8M.13.14.15.16.Mahda S/o ShabanGanaieMohd Saleem S/o AbRahim BhatGh Mohd Diva S/o MohdRamzan DevaAli Mohd Ganaie S/oMohd Sultan GanaieDusoo 2K Published Instead Of 3K.KrenchooKrenchooGundbalChange in Khasra No.749Less area by 4kName does not exist in paper.Name existing at Sr No.272Area Registered is only 2kagainst which inputs issued andlatter supervised.Area Registered is only 1k 4Magainst which inputs issued andlatter supervised.Area rejuvenated 3K, deductionof 1K made on the basis of poorplant geometry and under sizecorms.The actual Khasra No registeredis 2749. Khasra No.749 notverified by the concernedrevenue authorities.The farmer has rejuvenated anarea of 16k 12M only as per theguidelines of the mission andthe same has been published inthe final list.The beneficiary Figuring at Sr.No. 31 in the final list.The beneficiaryexists at Sr. No.81 inthe final listpublished.The beneficiaryexists at Sr. No.26 inthe final listpublished.The beneficiaryexists at Sr. No.272in the final listpublished.Claim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedThe beneficiaryFiguring at Sr. No.DisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposed

17.18.Gh Rasool Dar S/o GaffarDarMohd Yasin shah S/OAhmad Shah19. Nazir Ahmad GanaieS/o; Ab Rehman Ganaie20.21.Imtiyaz Ahmad Shah S/oJalal Ud Din ShahGowhar Maqbool & RoufAhmad S’s/o: MohdMaqbool MirLalporaLasjanChandharaArea published 2k 18 M instead of6kArea published 4k instead of 6kKhasraNos.1545,1544,1547,1556,1296,923not includedChandhara Less area by 1kDusooName does not existsArea registered 3K only andrejuvenated 2k 18m and thesame has been verified by therevenue authorities.Area has been Corrected by thecircle officer as reported by him.The variation has been due toerror but actual area is 6Kinstead of 4K.The farmer under RegistrationformNo.6508 was registeredonly for 3k,6M,The name does not exist inregistration list, however oneImtiyaz Ahmad Baba S/o Jalal UdDin Baba has rejuvenated 1K 5Mas per norms of mission andverified by revenue authority.Plot was not rejuvenated underthe supervision of the field staff.31 of the final listpublished.Claim rejectedCorrectedThe farmer hasrejuvenated 2k 13Mas per the guidelinesof the mission outof 3k, 6M offeredClaim rejected.Claim rejected.Claim rejected.DisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposed.Chief Agriculture OfficerPulwama

Circle: ParigamS.No1Name of the Farmer withparentageGh Mohi ud din Bhat (MahdaBhat) S/o Aziz BhatResidenceParigam2 Ab Ahad Mir S/o Aziz Mir K Parigam3 Rasool Wani S/l Rahim Mir K. Parigam4Manzoor Ahmad Bhat s/OMohd Sidiq BhatJ Parigam5 Gh Nabi Bhat S/o; Khalil Bhat J.Parigam6789Mohd Sultan Bhat S/oMunawar BhatGh Nabi Ganie S/o: Gh MohdGanaieGh Mohd Bhat S/o Ab RehmanBhatAshiq Husain S/o Gh QadirMalla.ParigamMagrayporaNature ofobjectionName does notexist in the listArea rejuvenated2k and published1k only1k publishedInstead of 1k 13m10M publishedInstead of 1k 10m4k publishedInstead of 5k1K 16k publishedInstead of 3kName does notexists in list.Parigam Less area by 10M.J Parigam10 Sulla Bhat S/o: Ama Bhat J. ParigamName does notexist in the listName does notExists inpublication.Reply of circle officer/verificationcommitteeThe rejuvenated area of 14m has notbeen authenticated by the concernedrevenue authorities1k of land was laid under guidelines ofthe Mission and same was endorsed bythe verification committee.1K of land was sown as per theguidelines of mission.10M has been rejuvenated and verifiedby the verification committee.Only 4 k rejuvenated as per theguidelines of the mission.The farmer rejuvenated 2K where asonly 1K 16M have been observed as perthe guidelines of the Mission.Actual area rejuvenated only 10m andinputs have been issued only for the same.However the farmer has failed to get therevenue certificate from the revenueauthorities hence does not qualifyActual area rejuvenated only 10M andinputs have been issued only for 10MFarmer has rejuvenated 4k but fallsunder additional 2 ndThe inputs have been issued in thename of Mushtaq Ahmad S/o Sulla Bhatas registered beneficiary expired beforeReport of securitizingcommitteeDue to non availability ofrevenue recodes theclaim is rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedcircle officer has failed toproduce the originalregistration form furtherverification committee hasnot verified the samehenceClaim rejected.Claim rejected.Seed was not verified bythe seed verificationcommittee, Hence Claimrejected.The circle officers weredirected to produce theregistered form alongStatus of thecaseDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedThe claim maybeentertained

ejuvenation thus the name skipped offin the final list hence may beincorporatedwith revenue certificateand death certificated toCAO Pulwama forfurther necessary action.only afterproduction ofrequireddocuments asrecommendedby thecommittee.Chief Agriculture OfficerPulwama

Circle: Jawbahara.S.No123Name of the Farmer withparentageMohd Jabar Kuchay S/oReshi KuchayAbdullah Sheikh S/o FatahSheikhShowkat Husain Kuchay &Muzaffar Husain KuchayResidenceBarsooBarsooBarsoo4 Mohd Shafi Kuchay Barsoo567Parviaz Ahmad Kuchay &others S/o Gh Qadir KuchayMohd Shaban S/o: MohdSabir KuchayMiss Misra Begam D/o LalaDarBarsooBarsooBarsooNature ofobjection1k 15mpublishedinsisted of 2k1k publishedinsisted of 4k4k2m publishedinsisted of 7k 7m1k 8m publishedinsisted of 2k6mCompliantregarding thefinal listpublishedAccount nocorrection.Name does notexist in the listReply of circle officer/VerificationcommitteeFarmer has withdrawn theobjection.Farmer has withdrawn theobjection.Farmer has withdrawn theobjection.Farmer has withdrawn theobjection.Farmer has withdrawn theobjection.Report of securitizingcommitteeWithdrawn.Withdrawn.Withdrawn.Withdrawn.Withdrawn.Status ofthe caseDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedRecommended by circle officer. Ac. No. Corrected. DisposedFarmer is not registered, and hasnot offered any land under NMS2012-13.Claim rejected.DisposedChief Agriculture OfficerPulwama

Circle: KhrewS.No1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.Name of the Farmerwith parentageAb Gani WaniS/O; KhatjiAb Rashid Wani S/OKhatji BanooGh Mohd Wani S/O AliMohd WaniNazir Ahmad WaniS/o: Asadulla WaniMohd Shafi Wani S/OMohd Ramzan WaniGh Rasool Wani S/OMohd Ramzan WaniFarooq Ahmad, MohdJamal, Gh Nabi SheikhS/o: Abdulla SheikhAb Ahad Sheikh S/ORamzan SheikhAhad Ahanger S/OKhaliq AhangerResidenceKhrewKhrewSharshaliKhrewSharshaliSharshaliKhrewKhrewKhrewNature ofobjectionArea published 1k17m instead of 1k19mArea published 1k16m instead of 1k18mName does notexist in the listName does notexist in the listName does notexist in the listLess area shownin the list by 3kName does notexist in the list5K publishedinstead of 6KName does notexist in the listReply of circleofficer/verificationcommitteeArea rejuvenated, measuredand verified is 1K 17M only.Area rejuvenated, measuredand verified is 1K 16M only.The farmer has notrejuvenated under staffsupervision.Guidelines deviated hencerejected.Offered land falls underAdditional 2 nd . But not verifiedby the Seed verificationcommittee.Area Rejuvenated under Normalregistration is 3K,3K deducted pertain toAdditional 2 nd which has notbeen verified by the Seedverification committee.The Plots of the beneficiarywas rejected because of thedeviation from Guide lines20% deduction due toundersized corms.The Plot of the beneficiarywas rejected because of thedeviation from Guide lines.Report of securitizing committeeClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedStatus ofthe caseDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposed

10.11.12.13.14.Majeed Sheikh, NazirSheikh ,Rashid SheikhS/O Mohd SultanSheikhGh Rasool Wani S/ORehman WaniMushtaq Ahmad DarS/O Mohd Akbar DarAb Majeed Dar S/OMohd Akbar DarManzoor Ahmad Wani,Ali Mohd S/O AziziRigooKhrewKhrewKhrewKhrewKhrew15. Jalla Bhat S/O Aziz Bhat Khrew16.17.18.19.Haleema D/O KhazirBhatGh Hassan Darzi S/O GhMohd DarziAssad Lone, Anwar,Naba Lone S/O KarimLoneGh Hassan, Majid, Ss/ORasool Sheikh & MohiUd Din S/O Assad BhatKhrewKhrewKhrewKhrewLess area shownby 3kArea Published 1K10M instead of 3k5mArea Published 1Kinstead of 1k 15mArea Published 1K,12M instead of2kArea Published 1K12M instead of 2KArea Published 1K5m instead of 2kArea published10M instead of 1KrejuvenatedName does notexist in the listArea Published2K4m eachinstead of 2k 17mName does notexist in the final lit3 Kanals not rejuvenated asper guidelines, not verified byverification committeeThe plot measurement is 2k only outof which 10 m curtailment wasmade due to undersized corms sizeand deviation of guidelines.Area measured 1k9m out ofwhich 9m deducted due topoor plant geometryInputs have been issued only for1k 12m,the same has beenrejuvenated as per theGuidelines of the MissionArea offered 1k 12m andrejuvenated 1k 12M.Only 1k 5m rejuvenated underthe supervision of field staff .Only 10M rejuvenated underthe supervision of field staffSowing not done undersupervision of the field staffOnly 2K 4M rejuvenated byeach farmer as per theguidelines of the missionIn 1 st two case the plots wereinspected by verificationcommittee in routine checkup however field officersreported that the plots arenot laid under the guidelinesClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedAs the inputs stands issued for1k 12m only hence claimrejected.Claim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedOnly 6k 12m was verified asper guidelines, claim notJustified.Claim rejectedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposed

20.21.22.23.24.25.Gh Qadir Bhat S/O WaliBhatMohd Sidiq Wani S/OAmbir WaniGh Nabi Lone S/OGaffar LoneAb Rashid Rigoo S/OGani RigooGh Hassan S/O GhRasool WaniMajeed Sheikh S/OAma SheikhKhrewKhrewKhrewKhrewKhrewKhrewArea published 1Kinstead of 2KCorrection in AcNo.Area published 1K10M instead of 2KrejuvenatedArea published 2Kinstead of 3KrejuvenatedArea published 1K15M instead of 2K10MArea published 3Kinstead of 5Krejuvenatedof the mission hence rejected.In 3 rd case the plot was notlaid under the supervision ofthe staff hence rejected.The claimed plot has beenregistered under form no12716 in Additional 2 ndregistration. As per the normsthe seed was not verified bythe seed verificationcommittee.No registration stands in thename of Mohd Sidiq Wani S/OAmbir WaniNormal registration 1k 10M andrejuvenated the same area of 1K10M whereas 2nd Additionalregistration 6M, But seed wasnot verified by the seedverification committee.Normal registration 2K andrejuvenated the in same areaof 2K whereas 2 nd. Additionalregistration of 15M, the seedwas not verified by the seedverification committee.The farmer offered 2k 10m videtwo plots measuring 1k 15m and15 m . but only 1plot of 1k 15mmonitored by the staff.Normal registration 3K only,The claim for 10M is in theadditional 2 nd where seed wasnot verified by the seedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejected.DisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposed

verification committee.26.Mst Azizi D/O GaniRigooKhrew27. Akbar Lone S/O Ali Lone Khrew28.29.30.Gh Nabi Lone S/O AmaLoneArshad Ahmad Mir S/OGh Rasool MirKhrewKhrewGh Mohd Rather S/OAb Satar Rather Khrew31. Jana D/o: Ab Ahad Bhat Khrew32.33.Asadulla Sheikh S/O AbAhad SheikhMohd Akbar Wani S/OSultan WaniKhrewKhrewArea rejuvenated2K 10M butpublished only10MArea published 3K10M instead of 4KCorrection BankBranchName does notexist in the listArea published 4Kinstead of 5Krejuvenated.Area published 3K17 instead of 4K18MArea published 2Kinstead of 3KrejuvenatedArea published 2Kinstead of 3K 17Mrejuvenated.Only 10M found as per thespecification, the farmer wastotally non cooperative anddid not follow the guidelinesin the rest of area.3k 10m were laid as per theguidelines of the missionverification committee verifiesthe same 3k 10m.Recommended by circleofficerNo registration exists in thename of claimant & theKhasra no. mentioned in theobjection does not exist in therevenue records.Additional area 1K only has beenapproved by the monitoringteam during the field visitsonspot hence the total arearejuvenated is only 4k.Actual registration for 4K onlyout of which only 3K 17M wasfound as per the guidelines ofthe mission.Only 2K of land was registeredby the farmer, benefit for thesame accorded.Farmer has registered for 2Konly and benefit accorded forthe same.Claim rejectedClaim rejected.Corrected as JKB LadhooClaim rejectedClaim rejected.Claim rejectedClaim rejected.Claim rejectedDisposedDisposedCorrectedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposed

34.35.36.37.38.Gulla Wani S/O KhaliqWaniRashid Husain S/O LtMohd Akram RigooKamal Bhat S/O GaniBhatMohd Maqbool BhatS/O Akbar BhatAli Sheikh S/O RamzanSheikhKhrewKhrewKhrewKhrewKhrewArea published 2Kinstead of 3KrejuvenatedAc No CorrectionApplicationwithdrawnAc No CorrectionBank Branchcorrection39. Azi W/O Hassan Bhat Khrew Name Correction40.Mohd Yusuf Lone S/OMohd Subhan LoneKhrewChallenging theproperty rights ofthe Land KhasraNo.4221 undermutation No.795in the name ofshakeela AkhterW/o; BashirAhmad Lone R/o;KhrewFarmer has registered for 2Konly and benefit accorded forthe same.Recommended by circleofficerClaim rejectedCorrected as SB 17498DisposedCorrectedObjection with drawn Withdrawn DisposedRecommended by circleofficerRecommended by circleofficerName of the farmer ismentioned in the list as perthe revenue records and asper the registration formPayment Stopped by therevenue authorities owing tothe reason that the total ofLand is dispute in the court ofACR.Corrected as SB 7497Corrected as SB JKB LadhooDDO concern is advised tomake the necessarycorrections afterauthentication from thecompetent authority.SDAO Concerned is directed tostop the payment in favour ofthe beneficiary registeredunder Registration formNo.9877 till the case is settled.CorrectedCorrectedDisposedDisposedChief Agriculture OfficerPulwama

Circle: NamlabalS.No1Name of the Farmer withparentageAbdul Rashid Mir S/o: AbGani MirResidenceKonibal.2(I) Ali Mohd S/o: Gh Mohd Dar Namlabal2(11)Mohd Ashraf & Others S/o:Ali Mohd DarNamlabal3 Mohd Maqbool Bhat Eidgah Sgr.4 Khati D/O; Habib Bhat Konibal5 Mst. Fatima D/o: Reshi Bhat NamlabalNature ofobjectionArea published1K 5M insteadof 1K 10MArea published12M instead of1K 3MReply of circle officer/verificationcommitteeConcerned Patwari verified only 1k6.5M out of which 1K 5M onlyrejuvenated as per the norms of themission.Inputs issued for the 12M onlyverification committee verifies thesame area of 12M.Name Correction Recommended by circle officer5K 4M publishedinsisted 8k 4MObjectionagainst KhasraNo. Published innewspaperArea published1K 5M instead of1K 17MrejuvenatedCorrection in AcNo.Area rejuvenated and verified bythe monitoring team is only 5K 4Mas per the norms of mission.Khasra No. 3225 claimed byclaimant not verified by theconcerned Patwari.Only 1K 5M only has been approvedby the verification committee dueto under sized seed.Report of securitizingcommitteeClaim rejectedThe beneficiary hasinitial registration for12M only, inputsissued for the same,Claim rejectedCorrection may bemade as Mohd Ashrafinstead of MohdAshrar at SDAO levelafter verifying therevenue records.Claim rejected.Claim rejectedClaim rejected.Status ofthe caseDisposedDisposedCorrectedDisposedDisposedDisposed6(I)Gh Mohd Rain S/o: MohdRainaNamlabalRecommended by circle officer. Corrected as SB 3937 Corrected6(II) Gh Mohd Raina S/O Mohd Namlabal Name Correction Recommended by circle officer. Correction may be Corrected

789101112RainaMohd Raina S/O Gh QadirRainaAbdul Rashid Ganie S/O AbAziz GanaieAb Aziz Masoodi S/O MohdYusuf MasoodiMathaba W/O Ab AzizMasoodiAli Mohd Bhat S/O MohdBhatHamid Qadri S/O Gh MohdQadrimade at SDAO levelafter verifying therevenue recordsNamlabal Ac No Correction Recommended by circle officer. Corrected as SB 9275 CorrectedNamlabalNamlabalNamlabalKonibalNamlabal13 Ab Aziz Qadri S/O Gh Ahmad Namlabal14Jalal Ud Din Sheikh S/o:Ramzan SheikhNamlabal2K 10Mpublishedinstead of 3K 8M2K 6M publishedinstead of 3K11M2K 10Mpublishedinstead of 2K18M2K 14Mpublishedinstead of 2K18MName does notexist in the list2 Khasra No’s1729,1727 beincluded1K publishedinsisted of 2K10MDeduction of 18M on the basis ofproportionate undersized corms bythe verification committee.As per the verification committeereport only 2K 6M approved.Area rejuvenated and verified byverification committee is 2K 10Monly.4M deducted due to undersizedseed.No rejuvenation done according tothe norms of the mission.Only 1721 Khasra No. verified by thePatwari concerned for an area of 4K.Only 1k has been rejuvenated andverified by the verificationcommittee .Claim rejected.Actual registrationstands only for 3k 5Monly instead of 3k11Mclaimed by the farmer.However only 2k 6mhave been rejuvenatedas per the norms ofthe mission. HenceClaim rejected.Claim rejectedClaim rejected.Claim rejected.Claim rejectedClaim rejectedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposed

1516Zahoor Ahmad S/O GhHassan QadriAli Mohd Masoodi S/O AbGani MasoodiNamlabalNamlabal17 Mst Farida D/O Salam Dar Lalapora18Shameem Ahmad Qadri D/O;Mohd Shafi QadriNamlabal19 Gulla Najar S/o: Fatah Najar Drangbal1K 2M publishedinsisted of 2K4MChange ofKh.1385,1162,instead of2832,1273Khasra No .Name does notlist in the list1K 3M publishedinsisted of 1K11M3K 6M publishedinstead 4K 6MHalf area (1K 2M) authenticated bythe concerned Patwari. Affidavit forthe missing area of 1K 2M has beenproduced by the farmer hence maybe incorporatedRevenue authorities have verifiedthe Khasra No’s 1273, 1341, 2832only but not 1385, 1162.Family dispute, case is subjudicehence not included in the final listPublished.Only 1k 3m has been rejuvenated asper the guidelines of the missionand the same has been verified bythe verification committee.Deduction has been made by theverification committee due toundersized seed and plantgeometry.the verificationcommittee has onlyverified 1k 2M andthe same has beenpublished .Therevenue certificatestands only 1K 2M.However insertion ofthe certificate doesnot qualify your claim.Hence claim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim pending withcircle officer due tofamily dispute.Claim rejectedClaim rejectedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedChief Agriculture officerPulwama