Circle wise list of farmers who have submitted objections against the ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

789101112RainaMohd Raina S/O Gh QadirRainaAbdul Rashid Ganie S/O AbAziz GanaieAb Aziz Masoodi S/O MohdYusuf MasoodiMathaba W/O Ab AzizMasoodiAli Mohd Bhat S/O MohdBhatHamid Qadri S/O Gh MohdQadrimade at SDAO levelafter verifying therevenue recordsNamlabal Ac No Correction Recommended by circle officer. Corrected as SB 9275 CorrectedNamlabalNamlabalNamlabalKonibalNamlabal13 Ab Aziz Qadri S/O Gh Ahmad Namlabal14Jalal Ud Din Sheikh S/o:Ramzan SheikhNamlabal2K 10Mpublishedinstead of 3K 8M2K 6M publishedinstead of 3K11M2K 10Mpublishedinstead of 2K18M2K 14Mpublishedinstead of 2K18MName does notexist in the list2 Khasra No’s1729,1727 beincluded1K publishedinsisted of 2K10MDeduction of 18M on the basis ofproportionate undersized corms bythe verification committee.As per the verification committeereport only 2K 6M approved.Area rejuvenated and verified byverification committee is 2K 10Monly.4M deducted due to undersizedseed.No rejuvenation done according tothe norms of the mission.Only 1721 Khasra No. verified by thePatwari concerned for an area of 4K.Only 1k has been rejuvenated andverified by the verificationcommittee .Claim rejected.Actual registrationstands only for 3k 5Monly instead of 3k11Mclaimed by the farmer.However only 2k 6mhave been rejuvenatedas per the norms ofthe mission. HenceClaim rejected.Claim rejectedClaim rejected.Claim rejected.Claim rejectedClaim rejectedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposed
1516Zahoor Ahmad S/O GhHassan QadriAli Mohd Masoodi S/O AbGani MasoodiNamlabalNamlabal17 Mst Farida D/O Salam Dar Lalapora18Shameem Ahmad Qadri D/O;Mohd Shafi QadriNamlabal19 Gulla Najar S/o: Fatah Najar Drangbal1K 2M publishedinsisted of 2K4MChange ofKh.1385,1162,instead of2832,1273Khasra No .Name does notlist in the list1K 3M publishedinsisted of 1K11M3K 6M publishedinstead 4K 6MHalf area (1K 2M) authenticated bythe concerned Patwari. Affidavit forthe missing area of 1K 2M has beenproduced by the farmer hence maybe incorporatedRevenue authorities have verifiedthe Khasra No’s 1273, 1341, 2832only but not 1385, 1162.Family dispute, case is subjudicehence not included in the final listPublished.Only 1k 3m has been rejuvenated asper the guidelines of the missionand the same has been verified bythe verification committee.Deduction has been made by theverification committee due toundersized seed and plantgeometry.the verificationcommittee has onlyverified 1k 2M andthe same has beenpublished .Therevenue certificatestands only 1K 2M.However insertion ofthe certificate doesnot qualify your claim.Hence claim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim pending withcircle officer due tofamily dispute.Claim rejectedClaim rejectedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedChief Agriculture officerPulwama
Page 1 and 2: Circle wise list of farmers who hav
Page 3 and 4: Circle : Wuyen BS.No12345Name of th
Page 5 and 6: 242526Arshad Ahmad Bhat S/O MohdSha
Page 7 and 8: 121314Mst Khati W/o; Gh MohdRatherN
Page 9 and 10: Circle: Wuyen A.S.No12345678Name of
Page 11 and 12: Circle: Konibal BS.No1.2.3.4.5.6.7.
Page 13 and 14: 17.18.Gh Rasool Dar S/o GaffarDarMo
Page 15: ejuvenation thus the name skipped o
Page 18 and 19: Circle: KhrewS.No1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.
Page 20 and 21: 20.21.22.23.24.25.Gh Qadir Bhat S/O
Page 22 and 23: 34.35.36.37.38.Gulla Wani S/O Khali

Circle wise list of farmers who have submitted objections against the ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?