#75 Wnt5a Induced Tumorigenic Behaviors <strong>of</strong> Enamel Epithelium Cell via <strong>The</strong> Non-CanonicalWnt5a/JNK P<strong>at</strong>hway.W.SUKARAWAN, D. SIMMONS, C. SUGGS, and J.T. WRIGHTDental Research Center, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> - Chapel Hill, USAObjective: Ameloblastoma is the most common epithelial odontogenic tumor. It is locally invasive, persistentgrowth with high ability to produce marked deformity <strong>of</strong> the face. We previously demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> high Wnt5aexpression was detected in the abnormal epithelial component <strong>of</strong> human ameloblastoma using microarray andimmunohistochemistry approaches. Moreover, overexpression <strong>of</strong> Wnt5a in enamel epithelium cell (LS-8)associ<strong>at</strong>ed with several altered growth properties which were characteristic <strong>of</strong> tumorigenic cells. Wnt5a is knownto initi<strong>at</strong>e <strong>at</strong> least three non-canonical p<strong>at</strong>hways in different cell types depending on cell context. Method: In thisstudy, pharmacological inhibitors were used to determine the downstream p<strong>at</strong>hway th<strong>at</strong> was triggered by Wnt5a inenamel epithelium cell. Results: We demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> specific JNK inhibitor (SP600125) and ROCK inhibitor(Y27632) were able to reverse the transformed phenotypes which we found in Wnt5a overexpressed enamelepithelium cell. We also found th<strong>at</strong> when JNK1 or JNK2 were overexpressed in LS-8 cells, they exhibited thesimilar phenotype to Wnt5a overexpressed cell. Conclusion: Our results showed the involvement <strong>of</strong> JNK p<strong>at</strong>hwayand Wnt5a in enamel epithelium cell and suggested th<strong>at</strong> Wnt5a/JNK p<strong>at</strong>hway might responsible for tumorigenicbehavior in enamel epithelium cell. Supported by NIH/NIDCR#76 <strong>The</strong> Effects <strong>of</strong> Surface Roughness on Expression <strong>of</strong> Genes Involved in Wnt Signalingp<strong>at</strong>hway during Osteogenic Differenti<strong>at</strong>ionJ. GUO, D.B. MENDONCA, G. MENDONCA, and L.F. COOPERDepartment <strong>of</strong> Prosthodontics<strong>The</strong> Wnt signaling p<strong>at</strong>hway is a complex network <strong>of</strong> proteins most well known for their roles in embryogenesisand cancer. In human, there are <strong>at</strong> least 19 family members <strong>of</strong> Wnt proteins which act as ligands medi<strong>at</strong>ing Wntsignaling p<strong>at</strong>hway. <strong>The</strong> roles <strong>of</strong> Wnt signaling p<strong>at</strong>hway in normal physiological processes in adults have also beensuggested, including bone remodeling. Objective: <strong>The</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> the study is to investig<strong>at</strong>e the effects <strong>of</strong> surfaceroughness on Wnt signaling p<strong>at</strong>hway during the osteoblastic differenti<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> human mesenchymal stem cells(hMSCs). Methods: Human MSCs were seeded onto the acid-etched titanium rough surface and smooth surface,and induced to differenti<strong>at</strong>e along osteogenic p<strong>at</strong>hway for 1 to 14 days. Total RNA and then the cDNAs weresynthesized from the cells collected after 1, 3, 7, and 14 days <strong>of</strong> osteogenic induction. <strong>The</strong> p<strong>at</strong>hway-specific qRT-PCR arrays were used to study the expression levels <strong>of</strong> the genes involved in Wnt signaling p<strong>at</strong>hway. Results: Oneday after osteogenic differenti<strong>at</strong>ion, several Wnt signaling p<strong>at</strong>hway rel<strong>at</strong>ed genes were regul<strong>at</strong>ed on both roughand smooth surfaces, including upregul<strong>at</strong>ed LRP5, FZD 1, 2, 5, 7, beta-c<strong>at</strong>enin, beta-c<strong>at</strong>enin interacting protein 1,and et al. Several genes were downregul<strong>at</strong>ed including Wnt 1, 2, 6, 7A, 7B, 10A, 11, and SFZD4. <strong>The</strong> difference<strong>of</strong> gene expression between cells from the rough surface and smooth surface were noticed after osteogenicinduction. Conclusions: Genes involved in Wnt signaling p<strong>at</strong>hway were regul<strong>at</strong>ed during osteogenic differenti<strong>at</strong>ion<strong>of</strong> hMSCs on both rough and smooth titanium surfaces. Rough surface demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed more regul<strong>at</strong>ed genes thanthe smooth surface.46
#77 Impact <strong>of</strong> the Visible Presence <strong>of</strong> Third Molars on Periodontal Health in Middle-AgedAmericansE.L. FISHER, K.L. MOSS, E.S. OH, J.D. BECK, S. OFFENBACHER, and R.P. WHITE Jr.Departments <strong>of</strong> Oral & Maxill<strong>of</strong>acial Surgery, Periodontology and Dental ResearchObjective: Document the presence <strong>of</strong> 3rd molars in a popul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> middle-aged Americans and evalu<strong>at</strong>e theimpact <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> 3rd molars on periodontal health on non-3rd molars in these same subjects. Methods:This cross-sectional analysis included 6,793 subjects ages 52-72 years who underwent a periodontal exam in the1996-1998 Dental Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Calibr<strong>at</strong>ed examiners measured probingdepths (PD) <strong>at</strong> six sites per tooth on all visible teeth noting clinical 3rd molar absence. Indic<strong>at</strong>or variables forperiodontal p<strong>at</strong>hology were periodontal probing depths <strong>at</strong> least 4mm (PD=4mm) and clinical <strong>at</strong>tachment levels <strong>at</strong>least 3mm (CAL=3mm). Outcome variables were demographic and clinical characteristics (mean periodontalprobing depths, % periodontal probing sites with PD>4mm, and % periodontal probing sites with CAL=3mm)grouped by tooth-type. Explan<strong>at</strong>ory variables were the presence or absence <strong>of</strong> visible 3rd molars. Differences inoutcomes between subjects with and without 3rd molars were compared by Chi-square and t-tests withsignificance