continuo section that includes lutes and theorboes as well as a keyboard and abass viol. 37 Several other Oxford Music School manuscripts from this periodhave duplicate bass parts that look as if they were performed by an ensemblewith a sizeable continuo section, presumably to involve as many players aspossible in music that, on the face of it, seems designed for only three orfour. 38According to Anthony A Wood, the return of Charles II to London at the endof May 1660 began a decline in Oxford music-making, particularly at themeetings organised by William Ellis:After his Majesties restoration, when the masters of musick were restored totheir several places that they before had lost, or else if they had lost none, theyhad gotten them preferments, the weekly meetings at Mr Ellis’s house began todecay, because they were held up only by scholars, who wanted directors andinstructors &c so that in few yeares after, the meeting in that house ... [was]totally layd aside ... 39[18] As we have seen, Baltzar probably left Oxfordshire for London in thesummer of 1660, though there is no record of his receiving a court post untilthe summer of 1661. But when his preferment came, it was a handsome one; inSeptember 1661 he was appointed as a violinist in the Private Music at £110 ayear, starting from Midsummer 1661. 40 £110 was a great deal of money whenmany of the violinists in the Twenty-four Violins were getting only the samerate - 20d. a <strong>da</strong>y - that their predecessors had been getting in the reign ofEdward VI. Moreover, since Baltzar received a new place rather than one thatwas already in existence, his salary may well have been a reflection of hispersonal standing as a musician rather than the application of precedence;£110 is one of the highest individual salaries paid to any royal musician at thetime, though a number of Baltzar’s colleagues actually earned more at Courtthan he did because they held several places simultaneously.Although there is no evidence that Baltzar ever returned to Oxford after hisdeparture for London, the note ‘Giuen mee by the Author, Mr Tho: Baltzar.October 1662’ at the end of the twelve-movement C minor. suite, shows thatLowe kept in touch with him, though it may have been in London rather thanOxford; Lowe also received a court post at the Restoration, as an organist ofthe Chapel Royal. The third suite by Baltzar in C. 102, an un<strong>da</strong>ted ninemovementwork, is of particular interest since parts survive for it in twodifferent keys. Five of them are in G major (the two violin parts, one copy ofthe bass part in the ‘loose Bases’ and a duplicate bass in Lowe’s continuo book,MS. Mus. Sch. E. 451), but the organ part in C. 102 is in A major, headed byLowe ‘Another Sute in A# the Other 3 partes prickt as they were first sett inGamut’. On the cover of E. 451 Lowe indexed the extra bass part - in G major37 Bellingham: op. cit., p. 4838 For instance, Ob Mus. Sch. MSS E. 431-6; a set of parts of Matthew Locke’s The First Part ofthe Broken Consort in Och Mus. MSS 772-6 includes autograph copies of the bass for threetheorboes.39 Shute: op. cit., ii, p. 10340 PRO, L.C. 3/73, 125; L.C. 5/<strong>13</strong>7, 287, quoted in de Lafontaine op. cit., pp. 125 and 140; E.351/546, f. 5, quoted In Andrew Ashbee: Lists of Payments to the King’s Musick in the Reign ofCharles 11 (1660-1685) (Snodland, 1981), p. 50
- as ‘Mr. Baltzars Sute in G: made in A:’. Despite these apparentlycontradictory statements, it is fairly clear that Lowe wrote out a continuo partin A for a Music School performance using a keyboard instrument tuned atone lower than the other instruments. A similar case exists in another MusicSchool manuscript, MS. Mus. Sch. E. 450 - a manuscript that contains one ofthe spare bass parts for the D major Baltzar suite. It also has a suite of <strong>da</strong>ncesby ‘Mr Crispion’ apparently for an Oxford Act ceremony. The part marked ‘forthe Organ’ has the note ‘prikt a note higher for ye violins sake’. Sincetransposed organ parts are not a regular feature of the Music School consortmanuscripts, I think that we can take it that the organ there, the ‘upright organwith 4 stopps, made by Ralph Dallans’ according to the 1667 bill printed byHawkins, was at the same pitch as the Music School viols and violins. Giventhat most of the surviving English chamber organs of the period, such as theones now at Compton Wynyates and Canons Ashby, show signs of havingbeen originally at high pitch (about a semitone above modern pitch), it looks asif the Music School Dallam organ was also at this high pitch, and that theBaltzar suite was performed on a particular occasion when a keyboard -perhaps a harpsichord - at the newer chamber pitch (about a semitone belowmodern pitch) was used. 41 Instead of tuning the stringed instruments downfrom high [19] pitch to chamber pitch, Lowe evidently opted to transpose thekeyboard part.The one consort work by Baltzar that remains to be discussed, a tenmovementsuite in C for three violins and continuo, stands apart from thethree-part suites in a number of ways. Although it too survives in a copywritten by Edward Lowe, the source, the part-books MSS. Mus. Sch. 241-4,seems to be associated with a slightly later period of Lowe’s activities asOxford Professor than C. 102. D. 241-4 started as two separate sequences ofmusic by Benjamin Rogers and John Jenkins. 42 Its original copyist is unknown,but it was given to the Music School by Theodore Coleby, a German who wasorganist of Mag<strong>da</strong>len College between 1661 and 1664. Later, Matthew Huttonand Edward Lowe added more items to the sequence of Benjamin Rogers, andLowe copied the C major suite by Baltzar and a fifteen-movement suite(actually three suites in one) for two violins and continuo by the Oxfordcomposer Henry Bowman. Lowe appears to have contributed to D. 241-4 inthe late 1660’s and early 1670’s. He <strong>da</strong>ted a four-part suite by Benjamin Rogers1668 and added the following note to the Bowman suite:Thes 15 Ayres were composed by Mr Bowman, & were first performed in thePublick Schooles on Thurs<strong>da</strong>y the 5 of Feb: 167 3 4 .’43It looks as if Lowe copied the Baltzar at about the same time as theBowman. They are the only works in D. 241-4 that are not by Rogers orJenkins, they are copied side-by-side between the sequences of music by thesetwo composers, and they are both found in the most recent layer of Edward41 I am grateful to Dominic Gwynn for this information.42 Andrew Ashbee: ‘John Jenkins’s Fantasia-Suites for Treble, two Basses and Organ’, Chelys, i(1969), pp. 7-8; Margaret Crum: ‘Bodleian MSS Mus. Sch. D. 241-4’, Chelys, ii (1970), p. 3943 Bodleian Library, Mus. Sch. MSS D. 243, 55
- Page 1 and 2: The Journal of the Viola da Gamba S
- Page 3 and 4: [3]THOMAS BALTZAR (?1631-1663),THE
- Page 5 and 6: the following spring he was in Engl
- Page 7 and 8: After The Siege of Rhodes nothing m
- Page 9 and 10: and ‘that great Virtuoso’. They
- Page 11 and 12: There is some reason for thinking t
- Page 13 and 14: [12] The difference between the two
- Page 15 and 16: ass viol simply by the process of t
- Page 17: of seventeen sets of consort music
- Page 21 and 22: Private Music in the court musical
- Page 23 and 24: most strongly with Oxford is the us
- Page 25 and 26: [25] Once again, the link between E
- Page 27 and 28: manuscript in the Oxford Music Scho
- Page 29 and 30: playing colleagues in the Private M
- Page 31 and 32: Appendix II:A Possible Portrait of
- Page 33 and 34: [35]
- Page 35 and 36: [37][38] Postscript:After this arti
- Page 37 and 38: [39]IMPROVE YOUR CONSORT PLAYINGA p
- Page 39 and 40: [41] The first note should always b
- Page 41 and 42: of the bar should not be taken into
- Page 43 and 44: [46] A slight ritardando can be int
- Page 45 and 46: secular work by Charpentier to use
- Page 47 and 48: [49] Before returning to the Charpe
- Page 49 and 50: heard together, the treble viol her
- Page 51 and 52: The delicate chromaticisms and subt
- Page 53 and 54: where the final chord invariably co
- Page 55 and 56: important one and, like ornamentati
- Page 57 and 58: information ought to exist in print
- Page 59 and 60: [66] dicular to the-neck needs cons
- Page 61 and 62: call c-fret-position. Michel Corret
- Page 63 and 64: [this image, p. 68]
- Page 65 and 66: [70]
- Page 67 and 68: [72]
- Page 69 and 70:
follows: Sheila Marshall examples 1
- Page 71 and 72:
[[76]
- Page 73 and 74:
Ithumpe' he doesn't make it clear t
- Page 75 and 76:
music which is now available, in ed
- Page 77 and 78:
serve as an example for the eager p
- Page 79 and 80:
a revision in which a number of han
- Page 81 and 82:
the Church. Nevertheless it is the
- Page 83 and 84:
Seaven Teares of 1604 in particular
- Page 85 and 86:
For Meyer the other side of the coi
- Page 87 and 88:
There are a few unfortunate errors.
- Page 89 and 90:
East, Ravenscroft, Kirbye, Peerson,
- Page 91 and 92:
accumulated wisdom of specialist de
- Page 93 and 94:
engraving of a seventeenth-century
- Page 95 and 96:
Lists and indexes of musical source
- Page 97:
The search for the key to the secre