Carl Hugo ÅgrenDiatonic Fingering on Treble and Pardessus ViolsChelys, vol. <strong>13</strong> (1984), pp. 61-76Music ReviewsChelys, vol. <strong>13</strong> (1984), pp. 77-82Book ReviewsChelys, vol <strong>13</strong> (1984), pp. 83-102Pearce WrightStradivarius 'Discovery' put to the test – Science report, TheTimes, 2 nd March 1984Chelys, vol. <strong>13</strong> (1984), p. 103EDITORIALThis issue of Chelys, with the exception of the major review of Meyer's EarlyEnglish Chamber Music by Christopher Field, avoids the area which so far hasserved as the central concern of the <strong>Society</strong> - English music of the earlyseventeenth century.Instead we move towards other areas geographically - to Germany wherePeter Holman considers the influence in England of Thomas Baltzar as aforeign virtuoso on the violin; and to France, where Adrian Rose highlights theimportance of Charpentier as a composer for the treble viol. The issue alsomakes a departure in its emphasis on different performance styles.It is becoming increasingly important to question the desirability ofattempting to arrive at historical accuracy, both in terms of producinghistorical copies of instruments, and in matters of performance-practice. Theaim of the scholar is the pursuit of truth; but in matters of style and taste,which concern the maker and the performer, this goal is necessarily elusive.Neither in the presentation of a critical edition with its atten<strong>da</strong>nt textualvariants (such as our Supplementary Publications), nor in the wide variety ofperformance styles (such as are presented in the articles by Alison Crum andCarl Hugo Agren), is it possible to arrive at a definitive answer. Is there notsome truth in the words of Kipling?:There are nine and sixty ways of constructing tribal lays,And-every-single-one-of-them-is-right!I should like to thank Stewart McCoy for preparing the prodigious numberof musical examples required in this issue.WENDY HANCOCK
[3]THOMAS BALTZAR (?1631-1663),THE ‘INCOMPERABLE LUBICERON THE VIOLIN’PETER HOLMANThe name of Thomas Baltzar is not entirely unfamiliar to students ofEnglish musical history. John Evelyn called him the ‘incomperable Lubicer onthe Violin’, Anthony a Wood described him as ‘the most famous artist for theviolin that the world had yet produced’, and Roger North went so far as tomake him- at least partly responsible for the decline of the treble viol inEngland:one Baltazar a Swede, about ye time of the Restauration came over, and shewedso much mastery upon that instrument, that gentlemen, following also yehumour of the Court, fell in pesle mesle, and soon/thrust out the treble viol ... 1Burney and Hawkins kept alive the memory of Baltzar as a great virtuoso,even though most of their information on him was copied directly fromAnthony a Wood, and writers up to the present <strong>da</strong>y have continued to see himas a famous performer - ‘ein Paganini seiner Zeit’ as Stiehl put it in 1888 -rather than as an important composer. 2 Had they bothered to look in detail athis music, or had Baltzar not died in his early thirties apparently leaving only afew compositions, then its quality and its influence on his contemporarieswould surely have been recognised before now.Most of our information about Baltzar’s life comes from the writings ofAnthony a Wood, who knew him personally and apparently played secondviolin to him in public on at least one occasion. According to Wood, and this iscorroborated by Evelyn, Baltzar was a ‘Lubecker borne’, though elsewhereWood calls him ‘the Swede’, as does Roger North, Edward Lowe and theofficial who dealt with the appointment of Baltzar’s successor at Court. 3 It isclear that Baltzar was known as ‘the Swede’ in England not because he wasborn there, but because he served for a period in the Swedish Court beforecoming to England. Archival research in Lübeck has shown that he was amember of a large family of musicians who served the town in variouscapacities for at least four generations (see Appendix 1). 4 His father David (d.1647) was a ratsmusikant or town musician, while his grandfather HinrikThomas (c. 1550-1615) and his great-grandfather Hinrik (c. 1510-1564) were1. British Library, Add. MS 32533, f.172v-3r, quoted in John Wilson ed.: Roger North on Music(London, 1959), pp. 300-1.2 C. Stiehl: ‘Thomas Baltzar (1630-1663), ein Paganini seiner Zeit’, Monatschefte fir Musikgeschichte,xx (1888), pp. 1-8.3 John D. Shute: Anthony a Wood and his Manuscript Wood D 19(4) at the Bodleian, ii (Ph.D. diss.,International Institute of Advanced Studies, Clayton, Missouri, 1979), pp. 100 and 108;Wilson: op. cit., p. 300; Ob Mus. Sch. MS C. 102b, f. 10v; PRO, L.C. 3/25, 58, quoted inHenry Cart de Lafontaine ed.: The King’s Musick (London, 1909), p. 2074. Johann Hennings: Musikgeschichte Liibecks, i, Weltliche Musik (Kassel, 1951), pp. 78-80