(TJJD) Office of Inspector General - Texas Juvenile Justice Department

More documents

Recommendations

Info

APPENDIX C: FORMAT FOR REQUESTING CHANGE(S) TO AGENCY BUDGETSTRUCTURESREQUESTED CHANGES TO AGENCY BUDGET STRUCTURE ELEMENTS(GOALS, STRATEGIES, MEASURES, AND MEASURE DEFINITIONS)1FOR THE 2014–15 BIENNIUMAgency Name: Texas Juvenile Justice DepartmentELEMENTS REQUESTED CHANGE(S) JUSTIFICATION FORREQUESTED CHANGE(S)Identify current goal, strategy,measure, or measure definition. 2Indicate requested change using strikethroughto delete text and underscore to add text.Indicate reason for proposedchange.Goal No. 4: Juvenile Justice SystemDescription: To provide necessary services for both CommunityJuvenile Justice and State Services and Facilities functions.New Goal D for strategies supporting both community and stateprograms and services.Goal No. 4Objective No. 1: Juvenile Justice SystemDescription: To monitor 100% of local and TJJD secure and non-securejuvenile facilities by fiscal year 2017.Goal No. 4Objective No. 1Strategy No. 1: Training, Certification, Monitoring, InterstateCompactDescription: Provide training, certification, monitoring and interstatecompact services and investigate administrative allegations atcommunity juvenile justice and state services and facilities.Goal No. 4Objective No. 1Strategy No. 1Measure Type: OutputMeasure No. 1Title: Number of Local Facility Inspections ConductedDefinition: The number of inspections completed during the reportingperiod. Inspections are defined by Family Code Sections 51.12, 51.125,and 51.126 and agency administrative rules and include inspections ofall juvenile pre-adjudication secure detention, secure hold-over, postadjudicationsecure correctional, and nonsecure correctional facilities.The monitoring of local facilities is a statutorily required function ofthe agency.Data Limitations: Number dependent upon number of facilities that areoperational and the number of scheduled and non-scheduled visitsconducted.
Data Source: Agency COMETS system maintains reports of allinspection and monitoring activities. Inspections conducted during theperiod will be pulled from the COMETS system. Data may be crosscheckedwith the number of facilities that are certified and registered inaccordance with Family Code Sections 51.12, 51.125, and 51.126.Methodology: Each inspection as verified through the data source iscounted once, even though the inspection may have required more thanone day and/or more than one inspector. All inspections during thereporting period are counted with the exception of unannounced visitsthat do not result in a standards violation. Abuse, neglect, andexploitation investigations within secure and nonsecure correctionalfacilites are not included.Purpose: This measure determines compliance with statutoryrequirements and agencies' ability to attain compliance with availablestaff resources.Calculation Type: Cumulative.New Measure: YesDesired Performance: Higher than target.Goal No. 4Objective No. 1Strategy No. 1Measure Type: OutputMeasure No. 2Title: Number of Annual Comprehensive Monitoring ReviewsConducted and Accomplished as a Completed ProcessDefinition: The number of on-site comprehensive monitoring reviews The agency is required to comply with the requirements of theconducted with the completion of all four (4) primary elements within the State Office of Risk Management (SORM), TJJD Generalprevious fiscal year. The four (4) primary elements are research and Administrative Policy (GAP) and the standards set forth by thepreparation, field monitoring and inspections, reporting of findings, and American Corrections Association accreditation process.the receipt of facility responses for all TJJD-operated and contractedsecure and non secure correctional facilities.Data Limitations: Number potentially impacted by unanticipatedcompeting agency priorities, non-scheduled monitoring reviews and theavailability of required resources.Data Source: Completed comprehensive monitoring review reports aremaintained within the Agency Monitoring file.Methodology: Each monitoring review is counted as one even thoughthe review may have required more than one day and/or more than onespecialist. All comprehensive monitoring reviews conducted andcompleted during the reporting period are counted as the results of themonitoring review are not a determining factor.Purpose: This measure determines compliance with the statutoryrequirements of the State Office of Risk Management (SORM), TJJDGeneral Administrative Policy (GAP) regarding agency support andcontrols, the standards set forth by the American CorrectionsAssociation (ACA) accreditation process and the agency’s ability toattain compliance with existing resources.Calculation Type: Cumulative.New Measure: YesDesired Performance: Higher than target.Goal No. 4Objective No. 1
Page 1:
Texas Juvenile Justice Department (
Page 5 and 6:
Texas Juvenile Justice DepartmentAD
Page 7 and 8:
Department Board chair.Ms. Townsend
Page 10 and 11:
closing date for survey submissions
Page 12 and 13:
Texas Juvenile Justice DepartmentSt
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16:
Page 19 and 20:
Topic 3: Establishing a Continuum o
Page 21 and 22:
FOR EACH QUESTION PLEASE:• PLACE
Page 23 and 24:
38%; 36%; 26% Assessment to identif
Page 25 and 26:
42% Accurate assessment of the yout
Page 27 and 28:
10. As a stakeholder, is there anyt
Page 29 and 30:
TEXAS JUVENILE JUSTICE DEPARTMENTGo
Page 31 and 32:
Texas Juvenile Justice DepartmentKE
Page 33 and 34:
Goal B: State Services and Faciliti
Page 35 and 36:
Texas Juvenile Justice DepartmentKE
Page 37 and 38:
M A J O R B U D G E T S T R U C T U
Page 40 and 41:
APPENDIX C: FORMAT FOR REQUESTING C
Page 42 and 43:
Data Source: Data relating to this
Page 44 and 45:
Strategy No. 1Output No. 1Title: Yo
Page 46 and 47:
Data Limitations: Relies on an up-t
Page 48 and 49:
Title: Total Number of Delinquent R
Page 50 and 51:
Data Limitations: Data used in the
Page 52 and 53:
Methodology: Calculated by determin
Page 54 and 55: Output No. 6 Output No. 6Title: Tot
Page 56 and 57: New Measure: No.Desired Performance
Page 58 and 59: Purpose: Juvenile Correctional Offi
Page 60 and 61: Methodology: Data sources are autom
Page 62 and 63: Desired Performance: Lower than tar
Page 64 and 65: Data Limitations: The measure is de
Page 68 and 69: Data Source: Assessment and Orienta
Page 70 and 71: Goal No. 2Objective No. 1Strategy N
Page 74 and 75: Data Source: Youth committed to TYC
Page 76 and 77: Purpose: Nearly all youth committed
Page 78 and 79: Data Limitations: The measure exclu
Page 84 and 85: Methodology: Total dollars expended
Page 86 and 87: Data Limitations: The Texas Youth C
Page 88 and 89: Objective No. 1Strategy No. 8 Strat
Page 90 and 91: Data Limitations: Even within the c
Page 92 and 93: Data Limitations: The Texas Youth C
Page 94 and 95: Title: Average Daily Population: Sp
Page 96 and 97: Data Limitations: TYC accepts all y
Page 98 and 99: Desired Performance: Higher than ta
Page 100 and 101: Definition: The number of youth ser
Page 102 and 103: APPENDIX C: FORMAT FOR REQUESTING C
Page 106 and 107: Strategy No. 2Measure Type: OutputM
Page 108: APPENDIX C: FORMAT FOR REQUESTING C
show all

(TJJD) Office of Inspector General - Texas Juvenile Justice Department

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?