13.07.2015 Views

Strategic Practice and Homework 8 - Projects at Harvard

Strategic Practice and Homework 8 - Projects at Harvard

Strategic Practice and Homework 8 - Projects at Harvard

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. Let X <strong>and</strong> Y be st<strong>and</strong>ardized r.v.s (i.e., marginally they each have mean 0 <strong>and</strong>variance 1) with correl<strong>at</strong>ion ⇢ 2 ( 1, 1). Find a, b, c, d (in terms of ⇢) suchth<strong>at</strong>Z = aX + bY <strong>and</strong> W = cX + dY are uncorrel<strong>at</strong>ed but still st<strong>and</strong>ardized.Let us look for a solution with Z = X, finding c <strong>and</strong> d to make Z <strong>and</strong> Wuncorrel<strong>at</strong>ed. By bilinearity of covariance,Cov(Z, W) =Cov(X, cX + dY )=Cov(X, cX)+Cov(X, dY )=c + d⇢ =0.Also, Var(W )=c 2 + d 2 +2cd⇢ =1. Solving for c, d givesa =1,b=0,c= ⇢/ p 1 ⇢ 2 ,d=1/ p 1 ⇢ 2 .4. Let (X 1 ,...,X k )beMultinomialwithparametersn <strong>and</strong> (p 1 ,...,p k ). Use indic<strong>at</strong>orr.v.s to show th<strong>at</strong> Cov(X i ,X j )= np i p j for i 6= j.First let us find Cov(X 1 ,X 2 ). Consider the story of the Multinomial, where nobjects are being placed into c<strong>at</strong>egories 1,...,k.LetI i be the indic<strong>at</strong>or r.v. forobject i being in c<strong>at</strong>egory 1, <strong>and</strong> let J j be the indic<strong>at</strong>or r.v. for object j beingin c<strong>at</strong>egory 2. Then X 1 = P ni=1 I i,X 2 = P nj=1 J j. SoCov(X 1 ,X 2 )=Cov(= X i,jnXI i ,i=1nXJ j )j=1Cov(I i ,J j ).All the terms here with i 6= j are 0 since the ith object is c<strong>at</strong>egorized independentlyof the jth object. So this becomessincenXCov(I i ,J i )=nCov(I 1 ,J 1 )= np 1 p 2 ,i=1Cov(I 1 ,J 1 )=E(I 1 J 1 ) (EI 1 )(EJ 1 )= p 1 p 2 .By the same method, we have Cov(X i ,X j )= np i p j for all i 6= j.5. Let X <strong>and</strong> Y be r.v.s. Is it correct to say “max(X, Y )+min(X, Y )=X + Y ?Is it correct to say “Cov(max(X, Y ), min(X, Y )) = Cov(X, Y )sinceeitherthemax is X <strong>and</strong> the min is Y or vice versa, <strong>and</strong> covariance is symmetric”?2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!