13.07.2015 Views

2. Maturity Claim - Gbic.co.in

2. Maturity Claim - Gbic.co.in

2. Maturity Claim - Gbic.co.in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

aggravated the difficulties It is not failr to play it safe by throw<strong>in</strong>g the burden of proof onthe MCD employees. The fair <strong>co</strong>urse <strong>in</strong> the circumstances will be to take policies out ofSSS and ask the MCD employees to pay the premium directly to LIC future. In any case,LIC open a dialogue with MCD at once with a view to clear<strong>in</strong>g up the mess.In the present case, Honourable Insurance Omudsman see no reason at all to withholdpayment of the first <strong>in</strong>stalment of survival benefit. He is satisfied after hear<strong>in</strong>g the<strong>co</strong>mpla<strong>in</strong>ant and after see<strong>in</strong>g the documents shown to him today by him that there are nogaps <strong>in</strong> the remittances of premium deducted from his salary.Honourable Insurance Ombudsman, therefore, passed the Award that Life InsuranceCorporation of India shall immediately pay to Shri Shanti Swaroop Bali a sum of Rs. 12500(be<strong>in</strong>g the first <strong>in</strong>stalment of survival benefit under Policy No. 1122417767) together withpenal <strong>in</strong>terest @ 8 % per annum for the period from 27.03.2004 to the date of actualpayment.Delhi Ombudsman CentreCase No. LI / DL - II / 200Shri Yogendra KumarVs.Life Insurance Corporation of IndiaAward Dated 13.01.2005Shri Yogendra Kumar has taken a policy from LIC of India under Salary Sav<strong>in</strong>gs Scheme <strong>in</strong>1977. He applied for payment of maturity claim which was not paid by LIC and then heapproached this Forum.Facts of the Case : The facts of the case are as under :-The <strong>co</strong>mpla<strong>in</strong>ant is an employee of the Central Warehous<strong>in</strong>g Corporation. In November,1977, he a policy for sum assured of Rs. 10,000/- under the Salary Sav<strong>in</strong>gs Scheme. Thepolicy <strong>co</strong>mmenced on 23rd November, 1977. The rate of monthly premium is Rs. 34.10.Premium at this rate was deducted from his salary every month and remitted to LIC by hisemployer. In his service <strong>in</strong> the Central Warehous<strong>in</strong>g Corporation, the <strong>co</strong>mpla<strong>in</strong>ant is liableto transfer from place to place. In the year 1999, while the <strong>co</strong>mpla<strong>in</strong>ant was posted atSaharanpur, he made request to LIC to take the policy out of the Salary Sav<strong>in</strong>gs Schemeand to permit his to pay premium directly to LIC <strong>in</strong> annual <strong>in</strong>stalments. He received noresponse from LIC. In the expenctation that his policy would be taken out of the SalarySav<strong>in</strong>gs Scheme, his employer (presumably at the request of the <strong>co</strong>mpla<strong>in</strong>ant) stoppedmonthly deduction of premium. The last <strong>in</strong>stalment of premium deducted from his salarywas for the month of August, 1999. Thereafter, no premium has been paid to LIC. On 18thJanuary, 2001, he wrote a letter to the Cantonment Branch of LIC at Lucknow stat<strong>in</strong>g thathe wanted to revive the policy and pay premium directly to LIC <strong>in</strong> annual <strong>in</strong>stalments. Healso sent a blank cheque dated 18.01.2001 towards payment of premium. He also made arequest for transfer of the policy re<strong>co</strong>rds to Saharanpur. To the best of his knowledge andbelief, the policy re<strong>co</strong>rds were <strong>in</strong> the office of LIC at Lucknow. He got no response fromLIC. He <strong>co</strong>nt<strong>in</strong>ued to wait. He tried to f<strong>in</strong>d out where his policy re<strong>co</strong>rds were. He wasunsuccessful. On 15.06.2004, LIC wrote to him as follows : “Your policy status dipicts thatyour policy has got transferred out of our DO. Please <strong>co</strong>ntact your employer where the lastpremium has been paid and therefore, we are return<strong>in</strong>g back your policy bond”.This non - <strong>co</strong>mmittal reply was of absolutely no use to him. At the time of gett<strong>in</strong>g this replythe <strong>co</strong>mpla<strong>in</strong>ant was already <strong>in</strong> Delhi. On 07.07.2004, he wrote to the Regional Manager atDelhi about his problem. He got no response. He sent a rem<strong>in</strong>der on 26.07.2004. Aga<strong>in</strong>,he got no response. He them approached this Forum for relief.The <strong>co</strong>mpla<strong>in</strong>t was referred to LIC for <strong>co</strong>mments / observations. The replay received by myoffice from LIC is reproduced below <strong>in</strong> full.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!