GAAP Matrix

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Issue Risk and Rating Mitigating Actions AlreadyTaken or Included(and Estimated Cost*)B. Sub-projectidentificationand Design1. ULBs that do not fitproject approaches aregiven subloans andgrants for politicalreasons (Moderate)Clear selection criteria havebeen agreed, includingreform commitment,existing financial capacity,audit complianceAdditional Mitigation ActionsProposed, Responsible Agency (andEstimated Cost*)CDMA to apply the criteria and Bankteam to review all selectionsSchedule and Milestonesof <strong>GAAP</strong> Actions*The criteria clearly agreedand documented bynegotiations2. Design specificationstailored to benefitparticular constituentsor contractorsHire competentindependent consultants,supervised by MSU, toprepare Detailed ProjectReports (DPRs)Consultants hired for independentreview($1.2 million)Public disclosure of DPRsThe consultants andpublic disclosure to be inplace from the projectstart($7.8 million)Detailed technical appraisalof specifications by theEngineer-in-ChiefThe Bank will review at least 50% ofDPRs at least for the first two yearsC. Procurement 1. Collusion amongbidders to seek higherprices, e.g. bidssignificantly higher thanthe ECE; similar namesand addresses ofdifferent bidders; bidsreceived from ‘shell’companies which thenoutsource work to localWide publicity is given innewspapersTender notices published indifferent officesInitially hire consultants to helpmanage the procurement process($450,000);Train ULB, PHED, and MSU staff tomanage procurement, detectevidence of collusion and coercionby bidders as part of the CapacityEnhancement componentPackage contracts to attract national(higher) level bidders;Training of key MSU staffby effectiveness;Broad ULB, PHED, andMSU staff training to beimplemented from year 1
Issue Risk and Rating Mitigating Actions AlreadyTaken or Included(and Estimated Cost*)contractors (Moderate)Additional Mitigation ActionsProposed, Responsible Agency (andEstimated Cost*)Provide oversight by reputabletechnical panel ;Publish bid awards and trends;Use of debarment provisionsSchedule and Milestonesof <strong>GAAP</strong> Actions*2. Lack of competition;coercion to preventpotential bidderspurchasing biddingdocuments (High)Advertising in broadlycirculated newspapersAdditional bidderworkshops to publicize theopportunities andproceduresModify qualification criteria in biddoc; Establish register of potentialbidders and send bid notices;($90,000)Make bidding documents availableon the website;Study the contracting industry($120,000)The procedures to beestablished and providedto design consultantsfrom year 1Make bid documentsavailable on websitesfrom the starte-Procurement as soon as the Bankrecommendedmodifications aremade; Enhance use of ComplaintslineContracting IndustryStudy Yr 1-23. Framing ofspecifications andselection criteria tofavor particularsuppliers (Moderate)Designers alerted to suchrisks;Review by MSU, PHED, andBankTrain designers in minimizing risksReview by third party specialists($1.2 M incl. in #1)Starting from Yr 1
Page 1: Governance and Accountability Actio
Page 5 and 6: Issue Risk and Rating Mitigating Ac
Page 7: Issue Risk and Rating Mitigating Ac

GAAP Matrix

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?