Survey Findings 1Figure 6 <strong>The</strong> relational benefits to teaching social and emotional skills are readily apparent; academic benefitsare seen as likely.Teaching social and emotional skills in schools:Will improve relationships betweenteachers and studentsThis is definitely trueThis is probably trueThis isnot true59% 35% 5% 1%Not sure30%Will improve relationships among studentsand reduce bullying57% 36%5%2%26%Will improve students’ academic performance,such as increasing standardized test scores7%36%41% 18%5%of teachers (77 percent) think social andemotional skills will improve students’academic performance (Figure 6).Teachers in high-poverty schools (schoolswith 60 percent or more students inthe free/reduced-price lunch program)are even more likely to endorse SELthan their peers in higher resourcedcommunities (Figure 7). <strong>The</strong>y are morelikely to report social and emotional skillswill improve student-teacher relationships(63 percent versus 44 percent), reducebullying (61 percent versus 51 percent),and improve students’ academicperformance (42 percent versus 27percent). Furthermore, only 8 percent ofteachers believe that social and emotionalskills should be taught to only studentswith social and emotional problems. <strong>The</strong>research base is beginning to explicitlyshow the positive effects of SEL forstudents in low-income communities. Forexample, students participating in socialand emotional intervention programsin high-poverty urban high schoolswere found to have improved social,behavioral, emotional, and academicadjustment, including higher grade pointaverages, compared to those studentsnot participating in the program. 46 Somenational education organizations thatserve these populations are embeddingSEL into their programming. 4718 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Missing</strong> <strong>Piece</strong>
Figure 7learning.Teachers at high-poverty schools are especially convinced of the benefits of social and emotionalTeaching social and emotional skills in schools:Will improve relationships betweenteachers and students60% low-income*63%Will improve relationships amongstudents and reduce bullying51%61%Will improve students’ academic performance,such as increasing standardized test scores27%42%*Income measured by free and reduced-price lunch.SnapshotMontgomery County, MD: Schools and CommunitiesCollaborate on SEL Strategic Plan“I know it will be a challenge … but it’s important work and we are committedto doing it.” 48 This determined sentiment expressed by an administrator inthe Montgomery County Public School District (MCPS) has sustained efforts toimplement districtwide social and emotional learning. In July 2011, administratorsbegan developing a strategic plan that included efforts to integrate SEL into theirschools and academic curricula to improve school climate and academic outcomes.MCPS has made SEL a district priority based on the growing evidence that SEL isnecessary, not only for interpersonal relationships and academic achievement butfor future success in the workplace.MCPS serves more than 149,000 students, 33.0 percent White, 26.7 percentHispanic, 21.3 percent students of color, and 14.3 percent Asian. 49 Althoughdistrict schools range in size and demographics, MCPS wanted to involve theentire community in developing the SEL components of its strategic plan. Inspring 2012, MCPS held a community forum to begin laying the groundwork. Morethan 250 community leaders attended and shared feedback. <strong>The</strong> forum includedseveral small-group breakout sessions where MCPS staff, parents, and communitymembers discussed how social and emotional competencies can be promotedin school, in the community, and at home. 50 District administrators believethat community buy-in is crucial to the success of their SEL initiative and havecontinued to incorporate community participation through their “network teams”in revising its strategic plan. <strong>The</strong> teams are made up of about 60 individualsincluding teachers, psychiatrists, parents, business leaders, and other communitymembers. Teams meet every two weeks to draft the plan. Parent involvement isespecially important in these teams as MCPS administrators hope that social andemotional competencies learned in schools will be reinforced at home by students’families. In addition to these efforts, teachers and school administrators haveworked hard to imbed SEL in Curriculum 2.0, a Common Core State Standardsalignedcurriculum that focuses on developing critical and creative thinkingskills, essential academic skills, and skills that prepare students to succeed incollege and career. 51 Curriculum 2.0 requires students to work in teams, activelycollaborate, and problem solve during lessons. 52Montgomery County hopes to have completed its strategic plan framework by June2013, with Curriculum 2.0 fully implemented in kindergarten through fifth grade infall 2013. 53 MCPS is on track to meet this goal, although administrators admit thatit has not always been easy. Measuring SEL has been a particular challenge, butthe district is committed to developing an evaluation program that can accuratelytrack both academic and school climate outcomes. Professional development (PD)has also been a challenge. Administrators want to make sure PD is targeted andspecific and helps adults accurately recognize the level of social and emotionalcompetencies in each student. Despite these challenges, MCPS is optimistic andexcited to begin implementation. As one educator remarks, “It’s tough work but it’sthe right work.”A National Teacher Survey on How Social and Emotional Learning Can Empower Children and Transform Schools 19
- Page 2 and 3: CIVICENTERPRISESCivic Enterprises i
- Page 5 and 6: An Open Letter to theAmerican Peopl
- Page 7 and 8: offers the Collaborative for Academ
- Page 9 and 10: at developing SEL say bullying is a
- Page 11 and 12: paths forwardAs a nation, we have t
- Page 13: INTRODUCTIONAmerica risks a generat
- Page 17 and 18: Figure 2 When provided with CASEL
- Page 19: Figure 5 Many teachers believe thei
- Page 23 and 24: “The academic pieces andSEL have
- Page 25 and 26: such as boosting academic performan
- Page 27 and 28: nearly 70 percent report that they
- Page 29 and 30: and poor academic achievement. 93 I
- Page 31 and 32: have an average 23 percentage point
- Page 33 and 34: Figure 11 Fewer than half of teache
- Page 35 and 36: is a composite score. 135 PATHS, Ra
- Page 37 and 38: development and acquisition of soci
- Page 39 and 40: PATHS FORWARDAs a nation, we have t
- Page 41 and 42: Strengthen SEL byInvesting in Educa
- Page 43 and 44: the House bill, and a similar bill
- Page 45 and 46: ACKNOWLEDGMENTSCASEL, together with
- Page 47 and 48: Characteristics of the sampleThe fo
- Page 49 and 50: Promote SEL in School• z Download
- Page 51 and 52: Nashville, Oakland, Sacramento, and
- Page 53 and 54: J.E. Zins, R.P. Weissberg, M.C. Wan
- Page 55 and 56: Interaction Effects of Program Trai
- Page 57 and 58: ibliographyAber, J.L., Jones, S.M.,
- Page 59 and 60: In R. Bar-On, J.G. Maree, & M.J. El