CIVICENTERPRISES<strong>Civic</strong> <strong>Enterprises</strong> is a public policy firmthat helps corporations, nonprofits,foundations, universities andgovernments develop and spearheadinnovative public policies to strengthenour communities and country. Createdto enlist the private, public and nonprofitsectors to help address our nation’stoughest problems, <strong>Civic</strong> <strong>Enterprises</strong>fashions new initiatives and strategiesthat achieve measurable results in thefields of education, civic engagement,health, and many more. For informationabout <strong>Civic</strong> <strong>Enterprises</strong>, please visit theirwebsite at www.civicenterprises.net.Hart Research has been one ofAmerica’s leading public opinionand strategic research firms for fourdecades. Throughout that time, Harthas been at the forefront of identifyingand understanding Americans’changing expectations, attitudes,and behaviors, and views on publicpolicy. Hart Research’s clients comefrom virtually every sector of society,including politics, labor unions, media,non-profit organizations, and for-profitorganizations including many Fortune500 corporations. For more informationabout Hart Research, please visit theirwebsite at www.hartresearch.com.Collaborative for Academic, Social,and Emotional Learning (CASEL) is thenation’s leading organization advancingthe teaching of academic, social, andemotional skills. Our mission is to makesocial and emotional learning an integralpart of education from preschool throughhigh school. Through research, practice,and policy, CASEL collaborates to ensureall students become knowledgeable,responsible, caring, and contributingmembers of society. Learn more aboutour work at www.casel.org.
Table of ContentsOpen Letter to the American People by Jennifer Buffett and Timothy Shriver 3Executive Summary 4Introduction 11Survey Overview 13Survey Findings 1: Teachers Understand, Value, and EndorseSocial and Emotional Learning for All Students 14What Is Social and Emotional Learning? 16Snapshot: Montgomery County, MD: Schools and Communities Collaborate on SEL Strategic Plan 19Survey Findings 2: Teachers Believe Social and Emotional LearningHelps Students Achieve in School, Work, and Life 20Snapshot: <strong>The</strong> Student Perspective 21Snapshot: Cleveland, OH: SEL Is Invaluable to Improving Behavioral Outcomes and School Safety 27Survey Findings 3: Teachers Identify Key Accelerators forSocial and Emotional Learning 30Snapshot: Austin, TX: School and District Efforts Align for SEL Results 36Paths Forward 37Snapshot: DuPage County, IL: Implementing SEL State Standards at the Local Level 39Conclusion 42Acknowledgments 43Appendix 1: Methodology 44Appendix 2: Additional Information on CASEL and Resources on SEL Implementation 46Endnotes 48Bibliography 55A National Teacher Survey on How Social and Emotional Learning Can Empower Children and Transform Schools 1
- Page 5 and 6: An Open Letter to theAmerican Peopl
- Page 7 and 8: offers the Collaborative for Academ
- Page 9 and 10: at developing SEL say bullying is a
- Page 11 and 12: paths forwardAs a nation, we have t
- Page 13: INTRODUCTIONAmerica risks a generat
- Page 17 and 18: Figure 2 When provided with CASEL
- Page 19 and 20: Figure 5 Many teachers believe thei
- Page 21 and 22: Figure 7learning.Teachers at high-p
- Page 23 and 24: “The academic pieces andSEL have
- Page 25 and 26: such as boosting academic performan
- Page 27 and 28: nearly 70 percent report that they
- Page 29 and 30: and poor academic achievement. 93 I
- Page 31 and 32: have an average 23 percentage point
- Page 33 and 34: Figure 11 Fewer than half of teache
- Page 35 and 36: is a composite score. 135 PATHS, Ra
- Page 37 and 38: development and acquisition of soci
- Page 39 and 40: PATHS FORWARDAs a nation, we have t
- Page 41 and 42: Strengthen SEL byInvesting in Educa
- Page 43 and 44: the House bill, and a similar bill
- Page 45 and 46: ACKNOWLEDGMENTSCASEL, together with
- Page 47 and 48: Characteristics of the sampleThe fo
- Page 49 and 50: Promote SEL in School• z Download
- Page 51 and 52: Nashville, Oakland, Sacramento, and
- Page 53 and 54:
J.E. Zins, R.P. Weissberg, M.C. Wan
- Page 55 and 56:
Interaction Effects of Program Trai
- Page 57 and 58:
ibliographyAber, J.L., Jones, S.M.,
- Page 59 and 60:
In R. Bar-On, J.G. Maree, & M.J. El