13.07.2015 Views

The Demand-Control Model: Specific Demands ... - Study at UniSA

The Demand-Control Model: Specific Demands ... - Study at UniSA

The Demand-Control Model: Specific Demands ... - Study at UniSA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

284 de Jonge, Dollard, Dormann, Le Blanc, and Houtmandently of changes in job demands (Karasek, 1979). <strong>The</strong> present study shows,however, th<strong>at</strong> effects of altering the amount of control seem to depend on theparticular job demands under investig<strong>at</strong>ion (i.e., workload, physical demands,or emotional demands). In other words, the kind of job demands th<strong>at</strong> will bepotentially stressful or challenging has to be considered before implementingany intervention. This means th<strong>at</strong>, for human service workers, emotional demandsare most important in the model. Further, this study has shown th<strong>at</strong> agood balance between demands and control might result in s<strong>at</strong>isfying and challengingjobs.In conclusion, the reported findings add to accumul<strong>at</strong>ing evidence of adverseeffects on psychological well-being jointly produced by both job demandsand job control. This study has shown th<strong>at</strong> different types of job demandsare—in combin<strong>at</strong>ion with job control—important in predicting both positiveoutcomes (i.e., job s<strong>at</strong>isfaction, job challenge) and neg<strong>at</strong>ive outcomes (i.e., emotionalexhaustion, psychosom<strong>at</strong>ic health complaints). Finally, using and comparingwell-defined occup<strong>at</strong>ional groups seem to contribute to higher research qualityin testing the DCM, and also give support to the choice of the DCM in jobstress research.REFERENCESAiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Public<strong>at</strong>ions.Andries, F., Kompier, M. A. J., & Smulders, P. G. W. (1996). Do you think your health and safetyare <strong>at</strong> risk because of your work? A large European study on psychological and physical workdemands. Work and Stress, 10, 104–118.Begley, T. M., & Czajka, J. M. (1993). Panel analysis of the moder<strong>at</strong>ing effects of commitment onjob s<strong>at</strong>isfaction, intent to quit, and health following organiz<strong>at</strong>ional change. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 78, 552–556.Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis ofcovariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equ<strong>at</strong>ions with l<strong>at</strong>ent variables. New York: Wiley.Breaugh, J. A. (1985). <strong>The</strong> measurement of work autonomy. Human Rel<strong>at</strong>ions, 38, 551–570.Cordery, J. (1997). Reinventing work design theory and practice. Australian Psychologist, 32, 185–190.Dirken, J. M. (1969). Arbeid en stress [Work and stress]. Groningen: Wolters Noordhof.van der Doef, M., & Maes, S. (1998). <strong>The</strong> Job <strong>Demand</strong>-<strong>Control</strong>(-Support) <strong>Model</strong> and physicalhealth outcomes: A review of the strain and buffer hypotheses. Psychology and Health, 13,909–936.van der Doef, M., & Maes, S. (1999). <strong>The</strong> Job <strong>Demand</strong>-<strong>Control</strong>(-Support) <strong>Model</strong> and psychologicalwell-being: A review of 20 years of empirical research. Work and Stress, 13, 87–114.Dollard, M. F. (1997). Work stress: Conceptualis<strong>at</strong>ions and implic<strong>at</strong>ions for research methodologyand workplace intervention (Doctoral dissert<strong>at</strong>ion). Whyalla, South Australia: Work and StressResearch Group.Dollard, M. F., & Winefield, A. H. (1998). A test of the <strong>Demand</strong>-<strong>Control</strong>/Support <strong>Model</strong> of workstress in correctional officers. Journal of Occup<strong>at</strong>ional Health Psychology, 3, 243–264.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!