Avoiding fluoride in drinking water, Andhra Pradesh, India

More documents

Recommendations

Info

catchment management1Symptoms of skeletal fluorosisof water-harvesting structures) andreduced groundwater extraction near tothese critical sources (e.g. by zoning).Case studyOne example of how local solutionscan sometimes work is the village ofBattuvani Palli in Andhra Pradesh.Here, Acción Fraterna undertook participatoryfluoride surveys (Box 1)as part of a watershed developmentprogramme. Watershed developmentprogrammes in the area typicallyhad previously focused on activitieslike promoting tree-crops to enablefarmers to diversify from groundnutmonoculture, and constructing checkdamsand other water-harvestingstructures to catch more water forirrigation. Generally such programmesignore domestic water-supply issues,even though domestic water-supplyproblems are often related to patternsof ‘watershed management’: especiallygroundwater development. However,Acción Fraterna were motivated toinvestigate more integrated options todevelopment, and had noticed theprevalence of health problems thatmight be linked to fluoride in drinkingwater.The results of fluoride surveys inBattuvani Palli using portable field kitswere of huge interest to villagers, manyof whom suffered from symptoms offluorosis. The day after the surveys werecompleted, people were busily exchangingresults and had memorized most ofthem. They wanted information tounderstand why they were sufferinghealth problems and, more importantly,to start discussing solutions. Thevillagers’ interest in and acceptanceof results contrasted starkly with thereaction from district-level authoritieswho stuck firmly to the official line thatthere was not a fluoride problem in thevillage. It was only after approximately12 months of interactions that these11Box 1. A methodology for participatory fluoride surveysMeasurement techniquesMethodologies available to monitor fluoride in water samplesinclude:● Laboratory analysis: reliable, but usually slow, whichleads to long delays in giving feedback on results tocommunitie.● Portable field kits: these can be reliable if the kits (basedupon colorimeters or ion-selective electrodes) are usedproperly, and make it possible to feedback results.quickly, as well as sampling a large number of sourcesacross areas quickly. In this study, a HACH portablecolorimeter was used (HACH pocket colorimeter Type I,Hach Company, Loveland, Colorado).● Indicator test strips: these can make analysis veryparticipatory and are useful for raising awareness onfluoride problems, but are not sufficiently reliable forpotential life-and-death decision-making.SamplingIn the vicinity of the study villages, water samples werecollected from each well within approximately 2 km of thevillage centre. This included the main domestic water-supplysources for the villages, but also other sources like irrigationwells in order to provide information on the (large) variationsin fluoride levels around the villages where better qualitywater might be available. Information on the type and usemade of each well was also collected, and using a GPSsystem, the exact location was also logged. Occasionalmeasurements were also made of surface water in tanksand check dams that are used to recharge groundwater.Given the high levels of temporal variation, importantsources were monitored regularly (monthly).Training and testingSamples were analysed using the manufacturer’s prescribed‘pipette’ method. This requires use of standard fluoride solutionsto calibrate the meter, and adding reagents to watersamples, so users must be experienced and careful.Training should be given to check that the procedure recommendedby the manufacturer is carried out, and to checkresults for consistency (by repeating tests) and reliability (bycomparison with results from laboratories). Our testingperiod showed that we would also need to dilute sampleswith distilled water by a ratio of 2:1 in order to remain withinthe measurement limits of the equipment.Analysis proceduresSamples were analysed using the colorimeter in a temporarylaboratory – a clean room with space to layout the samplesand equipment – usually on the same day as sample collection,either within the village or nearby. After solving problemsrevealed by the initial cross-checks (poor results dueto procedure, dilution etc) it was possible to complete10–15 tests in an hour.Calibrations of the portable meter were regularly checkedagainst standard fluoride solutions, and samples sent toother laboratories for cross-comparison. Regular checkingof different batches of samples over time, tests by differentoperators, and with different laboratories are important toreveal possible errors. It is useful to plot the field and laboratoryresults together in a scatter graph and to look fordifferences and patterns. In order to triangulate the findingsof the surveys, results were compared with results from arapid assessment where water users had been asked toassess the quality of water from domestic sources on thebasis of taste and whether they felt the water containedfluoride.Feedback of resultsParticipation of the community in collecting water sampleswas encouraged, so that people understood the objectivesof the survey and felt some level of ownership of thefindings. Equally important, results were then rapidlyreported back to the community and well owners. Wellswhere fluoride levels exceeded the safe limit of 1.5 mg/lwere marked with a red cross to indicate that the water wasconsidered unsafe for drinking.Vol. 24 No. 1 July 2005 25
catchment management1●that was drilled in the tank bed andclose to some low fluoride sourcesturned out to be unsafe.Recharge of the existing source andmanagement: It was thought thatenhanced recharge in the zone closeto the existing well and managementof water levels in the area (e.g. byrestricting pumping from adjacentirrigation sources) might influencefluoride levels.1111Undertaking fluoride measurements locallyauthorities started to accept the findingsof the preliminary surveys and to recognizethat people in these villages havebeen suffering because of the waterquality of their drinking-water supply.Health problems are not routinely linkedto the monitoring of the performance ofwater-supply systems.As part of a participatory planningprocess, ideas for solutions were developedthat included:●Treatment: Given the existing plentifulwater supply, despite very highfluoride levels, household- or community-leveltreatment of water was●an option. Filters and lower-costtreatment methods were both tried,but neither was considered to be anadequate solution due to high cost orlimited effectiveness.An alternative source for drinking:eight out of a total of 65 irrigationwells sampled in the vicinity ofBattuvani Palli recorded fluoridelevels below the safe limit of 1.5mg/l (in the range 1.04–1.46 mg/l).There was a cluster of wells about2 km south of the village (see Map)where a new source could be sited,however this area was disputed witha neighbouring village. A borewellEventually, an irrigation well withsafe fluoride levels (1.5 mg/l in early2004 compared to the 3.8 mg/l of theexisting source at this time) was usedto develop a new drinking-water supplyfor the village (see map). This providesa limited quantity of relatively lowfluoridewater to supplement the existingdomestic supply. The farmer whoprovided this well was compensated,and a new short pipeline was laid totake safe water to the village. Rapidhealth improvements were reported.However, the quality of this water willneed to be monitored regularly and thesource protected.By March 2005, after a prolongeddry period, fluoride levels had risen toan unsafe, although still improved,1.7 mg/l. While new borewells within300 metres have been prevented, 30 newborewells were drilled in the village inthe previous year and recharge has beenlow. The community are now consideringconstruction of a check dam toenhance recharge of the source, andthe village water committee has alreadyhad to reduce daily water collectionfrom the low-fluoride source to 50 litresper household and only 25 litres duringsummer.Conclusions andrecommendations11Figure 1The location of some key monitoring wells in Battuvani PalliParticipatory fluoride surveys linked toimproved watershed management couldbring relief to some of the hundreds ofthousands of people who are currentlysuffering from fluoride poisoningthroughout India. The need for muchbetter monitoring and mitigation measures,both areas where rural communitiesare clearly able to play a vital role,should build upon the routine use ofparticipatory surveys by governmentline departments and a broader26Vol. 24 No. 1 July 2005
Page 1: 1Avoiding fluoride in drinkingwater

Avoiding fluoride in drinking water, Andhra Pradesh, India

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?