13.07.2015 Views

protection and redress for victims of crime and human rights violations

protection and redress for victims of crime and human rights violations

protection and redress for victims of crime and human rights violations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 15 • Protection <strong>and</strong> Redress <strong>for</strong> Victims <strong>of</strong> Crime <strong>and</strong> Human Rights ViolationsIt follows from the clear terms <strong>of</strong> this provision that the remedies availablemust be effective <strong>and</strong> that their en<strong>for</strong>cement must be ensured by the competentauthorities. The remedies may be, <strong>for</strong> instance, judicial or administrative, although areading <strong>of</strong> article 2(3)(b) in fine suggests that the drafters <strong>of</strong> the Covenant had apreference <strong>for</strong> judicial remedies. It is noteworthy that, <strong>for</strong> the purpose <strong>of</strong> complyingwith the exhaustion <strong>of</strong> domestic remedies rule laid down in article 5(2)(b) <strong>of</strong> theOptional Protocol to the Covenant, the Human Rights Committee holds that an allegedvictim is required to resort only to such remedies as have “a reasonable prospect” <strong>of</strong>being “effective”. Moreover, it is <strong>for</strong> the Government alleging the availability <strong>of</strong>remedies to prove their effectiveness. 99Although remedies must be available <strong>for</strong> all alleged <strong>violations</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>rights</strong>guaranteed by the Covenant, the need <strong>for</strong> available, effective, independent <strong>and</strong>impartial remedies is particularly urgent <strong>for</strong> people deprived <strong>of</strong> their liberty. TheHuman Rights Committee has there<strong>for</strong>e emphasized the need <strong>for</strong> effective guarantees<strong>and</strong> remedies <strong>for</strong> detained persons in respect <strong>of</strong> all acts prohibited by article 7 <strong>of</strong> theCovenant, namely torture <strong>and</strong> cruel, in<strong>human</strong> <strong>and</strong> degrading treatment <strong>and</strong>punishment. In their periodic reports States parties should, <strong>for</strong> instance, “indicate howtheir legal system effectively guarantees the immediate termination <strong>of</strong> all the actsprohibited by article 7 as well as appropriate <strong>redress</strong>”. 100 In the Committee’s view, theright to bring complaints against ill-treatment, as prohibited by article 7, “must berecognized in the domestic law” <strong>and</strong> the complaints“must be investigated promptly <strong>and</strong> impartially by competent authoritiesso as to make the remedy effective”. 101The reports <strong>of</strong> States parties “should provide specific in<strong>for</strong>mation on theremedies available to <strong>victims</strong> <strong>of</strong> maltreatment <strong>and</strong> the procedure that complainantsmust follow, <strong>and</strong> statistics on the number <strong>of</strong> complaints <strong>and</strong> how they have been dealtwith”. 102 The Committee was “deeply concerned at the reports <strong>of</strong> torture <strong>and</strong> excessiveuse <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>ce” by law en<strong>for</strong>cement <strong>of</strong>ficials in Venezuela, at the State party’s “apparentdelay in responding to such occurrences [<strong>and</strong> at] the absence <strong>of</strong> independentmechanisms to investigate the reports in question. The right to recourse to the courts isnot a substitute <strong>for</strong> such mechanisms. The State party should establish an independentbody empowered to receive <strong>and</strong> investigate all reports <strong>of</strong> excessive use <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>ce <strong>and</strong>other abuses <strong>of</strong> authority by the police <strong>and</strong> other security <strong>for</strong>ces, to be followed, whereappropriate, by prosecution <strong>of</strong> those who appear to be responsible <strong>for</strong> them.” 10399 See, <strong>for</strong> example, Communication No. R.1/4, W. Torres Ramírez v. Uruguay (Views adopted on 23 July 1980), in UN doc. GAOR,A/35/40, pp. 122-123, para. 5.100 General Comment No. 20 (Article 7), in United Nations Compilation <strong>of</strong> General Comments, p. 141, para. 14.101 Ibid., loc. cit.102 Ibid.103 UN doc. GAOR, A/56/40 (vol. I), p. 50, para. 8.784 Human Rights in the Administration <strong>of</strong> Justice: A Manual on Human Rights <strong>for</strong> Judges, Prosecutors <strong>and</strong> Lawyers

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!