13.07.2015 Views

download the full article here - EISRJC

download the full article here - EISRJC

download the full article here - EISRJC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

E-International Scientific Research Journal, VOLUME – IV, ISSUE- 3, 2012, ISSN 2094-1749INTRODUCTIONSea urchin is one of <strong>the</strong> major fishery resources in <strong>the</strong> world which is rapidly expandingin many countries because of <strong>the</strong> high demand for its gonad or roe. However, wild stocks aredeclining in <strong>the</strong> major sea urchin fishing nations of <strong>the</strong> world (Keesing and Hall 1998; Andrew etal. 2002 as cited by Pearce et al. 2004). Market demand for sea urchin gonads is unlikely todiminish in <strong>the</strong> foreseeable future as Japan’s consumption of sea urchin product remains stableand as Japanese cuisine (e.g. sushi, sashimi) is rapidly becoming popular in <strong>the</strong> North Americanfood industry. It is unlikely that wild harvests alone will be able to supply future roe marketdemand. This scenario bodes well for <strong>the</strong> development of a successful sea urchin aquacultureindustry. According to Pearce et al. (2004) <strong>the</strong> two basic forms of sea urchin culture involves,first, spawning adult broodstock and rearing resultant larvae/juveniles to market size andsecond, enhancing gonads (i.e. increasing yield and/or quality) of wild caught adults held incaptivity by feeding <strong>the</strong>m natural or prepared diets (Pearce et al. 2004).The most commercially in demand species of sea urchin in <strong>the</strong> Philippines is Tripneustesgratilla, locally known as “Maritangtang” among <strong>the</strong> Ilocanos. Its fishery is a major source oflivelihood in many coastal villages particularly along <strong>the</strong> northwestern coast of Luzon Island andin <strong>the</strong> Bicol region. Sea urchin is harvested for local and export markets generating millions ofpesos per annum (Talaue-McManus and Kesner 1995). However, <strong>the</strong>re has been an alarmingdecline in <strong>the</strong> landed catch due to over-harvesting from <strong>the</strong> wild stock.Presently, <strong>the</strong>re is an observed increase in <strong>the</strong> mariculture of this species along <strong>the</strong>northwestern coast of Luzon Island particularly in Pangasinan, Ilocos Sur and Ilocos Norte.Stock enhancement is also being done through seeding or planting of juveniles in open coastalareas. Inspite of <strong>the</strong>se developments, <strong>the</strong>re is still a dearth of <strong>the</strong> culture and managementguidelines for this resource. The mariculture of this resource for increased production and forits sustainable management is a promising venture in <strong>the</strong> area because of <strong>the</strong> presence of idealmariculture sites and abundant natural foods for <strong>the</strong> organism such as Sargassum and o<strong>the</strong>rspecies of seaweeds and seagrasses.This study aimed to assess <strong>the</strong> viability of using prepared diets for <strong>the</strong> culture andgrowth of <strong>the</strong> organism on land-based conditions. This is important in increasing productionand continuous supply in <strong>the</strong> market and for future gonad enhancement studies to improve itsmarketability. Specifically, it aims to: (1) determine <strong>the</strong> somatic growth (wet weight and testdiameter) performance of <strong>the</strong> organism fed with prepared natural diets; (2) determine <strong>the</strong>gonad growth performance (gonadosomatic index) and gonad quality (color and granularity) of<strong>the</strong> organism fed with prepared diets; and (3) monitor <strong>the</strong> water parameters affecting <strong>the</strong>somatic growth performance and gonad quality of <strong>the</strong> sea urchin.215


E-International Scientific Research Journal, VOLUME – IV, ISSUE- 3, 2012, ISSN 2094-1749MATERIALS AND METHODSLocation of <strong>the</strong> StudyThe experiment was set-up and conducted within <strong>the</strong> premises of <strong>the</strong> MMSU College ofAquatic Sciences and Applied Technology campus, Pias Sur, Currimao 2903, Ilocos Norte,Philippines.Experimental MediaNine polycarbonate plastic basins each measuring 60 cm in diameter by 25 cm depthwere used in <strong>the</strong> experiment. Seawater was pumped from <strong>the</strong> coast in front of <strong>the</strong> collegebuilding using a diesel water pump into four concrete tanks measuring 4.0 m x 2.5 m x 2.0 m (Lx W x D). Unfiltered seawater from <strong>the</strong> concrete tanks was pumped using a 0.5 HP electricwater pump into two circular fiberglass tanks measuring 1.0 m diameter x 1 m depth providedwith gravel and sand serving as filtration tanks that supply <strong>the</strong> nine experimental basins on aflow-through system. The culture basins were aerated with NSB electric air pumps.EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNThe experiment consisted of three feeding treatments, namely: Treatment I - controlconsisting of fresh unformulated Sargassum sp diet; Treatment II - dried Sargassum sp pellets;and Treatment III - fresh extruded Sargassum sp pellets with three equal replications (Table 1).The dried and fresh extruded pellets were mainly of Sargassum sp. Asia and Tabije (2003) foundout that Sargassum is a better natural feed affecting <strong>the</strong> growth and gonad development of T.gratilla as compared with <strong>the</strong> seagrass Enhalus acoroides. Arrangement of <strong>the</strong> culture basinswas done in a completely randomized design (CRD) (Fig. 1).Table 1. Feeding treatments and stocking density used in <strong>the</strong> study.Treatments Stocking density ReplicatesI. Control ( Fresh Diet) 38 individuals/basin 3II. Dried Pellets 38 individuals/basin 3III. Fresh Pellets 38 individuals/basin 3216


E-International Scientific Research Journal, VOLUME – IV, ISSUE- 3, 2012, ISSN 2094-1749Fig. 1. View of <strong>the</strong> experimental set-up.EXPERIMENTAL ORGANISMSThree hundred Forty two (342) post-juvenile T. gratilla with test diameter ranging from36.00 to 55.00 mm and weighing from 22.00 to 54.00 g (wet weight) were used in <strong>the</strong>experiment. These were taken from <strong>the</strong> wild stock in Dadalaquiten, Sinait, Ilocos Sur,Philippines, a nearby municipality of about 15 kilometers from <strong>the</strong> experimental site.FEED PREPARATIONThe prepared dried pellets were composed of finely ground dried Sargassum sp. (sundriedfor 1-2 days before grinding) with 6% binder consisting of corn starch and gelatin. Thesteps in feed preparation following that of Alava (1996) were observed. The finely groundseaweed was sieved into uniform p<strong>article</strong> size. The binder was suspended into half of <strong>the</strong>required water (<strong>the</strong> required water for a kilo of prepared feed is 1,200 ml) while <strong>the</strong> remaininghalf was boiled <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> suspended binder was poured slowly to <strong>the</strong> boiled water stirringconstantly with low flame until jelly-like consistency was obtained. The gelatinized binder wasadded to <strong>the</strong> Sargassum and mixed. The feed mixture was pelletized at a size of 5mm diameterusing a manually-operated pelletizer (Fig 2), steamed with sea water for 5 minutes to enhance<strong>the</strong> binding of ingredients with an improvised steamer set-up, fan-cooled and sun dried for oneday. The pelletized feeds were placed and sealed in plastic containers and refrigerated.The fresh extruded pellets, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, were prepared by grinding <strong>the</strong> freshSargassum and mixed with <strong>the</strong> finely ground Sargassum at 1:1 ratio after which <strong>the</strong> gelatinizedbinder (as prepared above) was added and mixed. The feed mixture was pelletized at a size of217


E-International Scientific Research Journal, VOLUME – IV, ISSUE- 3, 2012, ISSN 2094-17495 mm diameter using a manually-operated pelletizer. The pelletized feeds were givenimmediately to <strong>the</strong> organism while remaining pellets were placed and sealed in plasticcontainers for refrigeration. Refrigerated fresh extruded feeds were given to <strong>the</strong> organisms infour days.Fig. 2. Finely ground Sargassum sp. mixed with <strong>the</strong> binder and pelletized.EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE AND SAMPLINGThirty-eight sea urchin individuals were placed in each basin. They were fed with <strong>the</strong>fresh Sargassum diet daily on an ad libitum basis and with <strong>the</strong> prepared diets daily at 1.5 % ofwet body weight. Pearce et al. (2002) concluded in <strong>the</strong>ir research that gonad yield of <strong>the</strong> greensea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis is maximized at 0.5 to 1.0% body weight(BW)*day-1 feeding of prepared diets. Since T. gratilla is a tropical species which presumablyhas a higher metabolic rate than S. droebachiensis which is a temperate species, a feeding rateof 1.5% of BW*day-1 was tried. However, during <strong>the</strong> first week it was observed that <strong>the</strong> 1.5 %wet body weight feeding ration was inadequate hence this was increased to 2.0 % during <strong>the</strong>second week and to 3.0 % on <strong>the</strong> third week until <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> study. Daily cleaning andmaintenance of basins were also done.Prior to stocking in <strong>the</strong> basins, <strong>the</strong> initial test diameter and weight of each experimentalorganism were measured and recorded. To monitor <strong>the</strong> somatic growth of sea urchin, <strong>the</strong>experimental organisms were measured in terms of <strong>the</strong>ir test diameter (mm) both equatorialand polar using a Vernier caliper and wet weight with triple beam balance of 1.0 g sensitivity.Sampling was done once a week for a period of six weeks.Three test organisms randomly taken from each basin were shucked upon <strong>the</strong>termination of <strong>the</strong> study to determine gonad growth in terms of <strong>the</strong> gonadosomatic index (GSI)and quality (color and granularity) (Fig 3). The GSI of <strong>the</strong> organisms was determined using <strong>the</strong>following formula (Lozano 1995):218


E-International Scientific Research Journal, VOLUME – IV, ISSUE- 3, 2012, ISSN 2094-1749Wet - weight of gonadsGSI = x 100Wet - weight of sea urchinGonad quality in terms of color was determined using <strong>the</strong> Munsell Color Guide. Theguide has three simple variables that combine to describe colors as hue, value and chroma.This study used <strong>the</strong> hue Yellow-Red (10YR) which is preceded by numbers from 0 to 10 w<strong>here</strong><strong>the</strong> hue becomes more yellow and less red as <strong>the</strong> numbers increase. The value notation usedwas 8 (near white) and <strong>the</strong> chroma notation used ranged from 1 to 8 w<strong>here</strong> <strong>the</strong> color becomesmore yellow with increasing number. The values based on <strong>the</strong> chroma notation were <strong>the</strong> onesrecorded in this study for gonad color comparison. The combination of a bright yellow colorand fine granularity of gonad is most preferred by <strong>the</strong> market (Blount and Worthington 2002).Fig. 3. Determination of <strong>the</strong> GSI and gonad quality of <strong>the</strong> test organisms.MONITORING OF WATER PARAMETERSThe water parameters which may affect <strong>the</strong> somatic growth and gonadal growth andquality of <strong>the</strong> experimental organisms were measured. Dissolved oxygen and temperaturewere measured by an Oaklon Dissolve Oxygen meter; salinity by an Atago refractometer; andpH by a pH paper.ANALYSIS OF DATAMeans and ranges were used to describe growth parameters of <strong>the</strong> test organisms and<strong>the</strong> water parameters. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA procedure of <strong>the</strong> SAS System) was usedto determine differences of somatic growth parameters among treatments with wet weightand test diameter as covariates. Analysis of variance (ANOVA procedure of <strong>the</strong> SAS System)was also used to determine <strong>the</strong> differences of <strong>the</strong> GSI, gonad color and granularity amongtreatments. A post test using <strong>the</strong> Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) was used to fur<strong>the</strong>rtest significant findings.219


E-International Scientific Research Journal, VOLUME – IV, ISSUE- 3, 2012, ISSN 2094-1749Fur<strong>the</strong>r, a correlation analysis using <strong>the</strong> Proc Corr procedure of <strong>the</strong> SAS System wasused to determine <strong>the</strong> strength of relationship of <strong>the</strong> somatic growth parameters, gonadgrowth and quality parameters, and water parameters.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONSOMATIC GROWTHWet Weight. Growth increments in wet weight of sea urchins cultured in basins forfour months culture period (MCP) at different feeding treatments are shown in Table 2. Thevalues are adjusted means with initial weight as covariate. After one month culture period,Treatment I significantly (p = 0.05) had <strong>the</strong> highest weight increment of 20.62 g compared toTreatments II and III with 13.88 g and 8.35 g, respectively. Although <strong>the</strong>re were no significantdifferences among treatments means of Treatments II and III, Treatment II relatively had <strong>the</strong>higher mean growth increment in wet weight. The comparatively lower growth rates ofTreatments II and III may be due to <strong>the</strong> adjustments made by <strong>the</strong> organisms feeding with <strong>the</strong>prepared diet. It was observed that <strong>the</strong> organisms only fed on <strong>the</strong> prepared diets after threedays of introduction.At <strong>the</strong> succeeding culture periods (second, third and fourth month), <strong>the</strong> growthincrements in wet weight of <strong>the</strong> organisms did not significantly differ among <strong>the</strong> threetreatments, however, Treatment I generally had <strong>the</strong> highest wet weight growth incrementfollowed by Treatment II. Treatment III had <strong>the</strong> least wet weight growth increment.Highest wet weight growth increment in all treatments was observed during <strong>the</strong> firstMCP and had a decreasing trend towards <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> study.The above results indicate that <strong>the</strong> test organisms fed with both <strong>the</strong> dried and freshpellets have almost similar growth in wet biomass with those fed with <strong>the</strong> fresh diet ofSargassum sp. The effect of prepared Sargassum sp. diet at 4.0 to 5.0% BW*day-1 on wetweight was even significantly higher (p


E-International Scientific Research Journal, VOLUME – IV, ISSUE- 3, 2012, ISSN 2094-1749III – FreshPellets37.88 8.35b 7.22a 9.78a 2.08a 27.43 6.86aMeans with different superscripts are significantly different at 5% level.*Adjusted mean with initial wet weight as covariate.Growth increments in equatorial test diameter of <strong>the</strong> sea urchins during <strong>the</strong> four MCPare shown in Table 3. The values are adjusted means with initial equatorial test diameter ascovariate. Although not significantly different, it was observed during <strong>the</strong> first MCP thatTreatment I had <strong>the</strong> highest mean growth increment in equatorial test diameter of 9.65 mmfollowed by Treatments II and III with 7.06 mm and 6.63 mm, respectively. However, on <strong>the</strong>second MCP until <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> study, Treatment II comparatively had higher equatorial testdiameter growth increment than Treatments I and III. Again, <strong>the</strong>re were no significantdifferences among treatments means. The overall mean also shows no significant differencesamong treatments which indicate that <strong>the</strong> prepared diets are comparable with <strong>the</strong> fresh dietgiven to <strong>the</strong> test organisms.Highest wet equatorial test diameter growth increment in all treatments was observedduring <strong>the</strong> first MCP and had a decreasing trend towards <strong>the</strong> third MCP with a slight increase in<strong>the</strong> last month of culture. Bangi (2001) also observed <strong>the</strong> same trend for <strong>the</strong> same speciesgrown for six months in cages on sea-based conditions at Bolinao, Pangasinan, Philippines. Theorganisms had a mean test diameter increment of 6.89 mm fed with low Sargassum and 11.10mm for those fed with high quantity of Sargassum on <strong>the</strong> first month of culture. She observeda generally decreasing trend towards <strong>the</strong> fifth month of culture with 1.84 mm and 2.94 mm for<strong>the</strong> low and high feeding of Sargassaum, respectively. T<strong>here</strong> was a slight increase in testdiameter in both feeding treatments at <strong>the</strong> sixth month of culture. The values obtained in thisstudy are almost similar with <strong>the</strong> values she observed in her study.Table 3. Mean growth increment in equatorial test diameter* (mm) of <strong>the</strong> sea urchin T. gratillaat different feeding treatments for four MCP.FeedingTreatmentMonths After StockingInitial 1 2 3 4TotalMeanI – Fresh Diet(Control)II – DriedPelletsIII – FreshPellets44.98 9.65a 1.84a 0.25a 1.34a 13.08 3.27a45.51 7.06a 2.52a 0.27a 2.66a 12.51 3.13a45.47 6.63a 1.04a 0.16a 1.90a 9.73 2.43aMeans with different superscripts are significantly different at 5% level.221


E-International Scientific Research Journal, VOLUME – IV, ISSUE- 3, 2012, ISSN 2094-1749*Adjusted mean with initial equatorial test diameter as covariate.Table 4 shows <strong>the</strong> data on growth increments in polar test diameter of <strong>the</strong> testorganisms during <strong>the</strong> four MCP. The values are adjusted means with initial polar test diameteras covariate. Results show that <strong>the</strong>re were no significant differences among <strong>the</strong> treatmentswhich indicate that <strong>the</strong> prepared diets are comparable with <strong>the</strong> fresh diet. It was also observedthat <strong>the</strong> highest growth increment in polar test diameter was during <strong>the</strong> first MCP whichfollows <strong>the</strong> trend on <strong>the</strong> growth in wet weight and equatorial test diameter.Fur<strong>the</strong>r, although not significantly different, Treatment I also comparatively had <strong>the</strong>highest growth increment in polar test diameter than Treatments II and III. Samples ofharvestable sea urchins representing <strong>the</strong> different treatments are shown in Appendix Figure 1.Table 4. Mean growth increment in polar test diameter* (mm) of <strong>the</strong> sea urchin T. gratilla atdifferent feeding treatments for four MCP.FeedingTreatmentMonths After StockingInitial 1 2 3 4TotalMeanI – Fresh Diet(Control)II – DriedPelletsIII – FreshPellets27.09 4.90a 1.30a 0.34a 1.40a 7.94 1.99a27.69 3.60a 1.28a 0.35a 0.35a 5.48 1.40a26.75 2.47a 0.79a 0.05a 0.40a 3.71 0.93aMeans with different superscripts are significantly different at 5% level.*Adjusted mean with initial polar test diameter as covariate.GONAD GROWTH AND QUALITYGonad growth and development measured in terms of gonadosomatic index and gonadquality determined in terms of color and granularity were assessed upon <strong>the</strong> termination of <strong>the</strong>study (Table 5). It was observed that spawning occurred as early as <strong>the</strong> second month ofculture period. Garvida and Asia (2004) also noted that T. gratilla grown in cages placed onland-based concrete tanks and fed with Sargassum sp reached maturity and spawned at about45 days of culture.The data showed that Treatment I had a significantly (p = 0.05) higher GSI of 5.77% thanTreatments II and III with 3.64 % and 3.40 %, respectively. Treatments II and III did not differsignificantly. Bangi (2001), in her study on <strong>the</strong> cage culture of <strong>the</strong> same species on sea-basedconditions, observed a mean gonad index ranging from 2.70 % to 5.16 % for <strong>the</strong> low Sargassumdiet and from 5.38 % to 8.14 % at <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> six month culture period. The data obtained inthis study, although <strong>the</strong> organisms were grown in vitro conditions and fed with prepared diets,are comparable with her study. Garvida and Asia (2004) also observed an average GSI of <strong>the</strong>222


E-International Scientific Research Journal, VOLUME – IV, ISSUE- 3, 2012, ISSN 2094-1749organism reared for 75 days in land-based cages placed in concrete tanks ranging from 5.60 to7.47 %.Table 5. Mean GSI, gonad color and gonad granularity of <strong>the</strong> sea urchin T. gratilla at differentfeeding treatments for four MCP.FeedingTreatmentGonad Growth and Quality ParametersGSI (%) Color Granularity, mmI – Fresh Diet (Control) 5.77a 7.11a 0.037aII – Dried Pellets 3.64b 5.22b 0.028aIII – Fresh Pellets 3.40b 4.67b 0.033aMeans with different superscripts are significantly different at 5% level by DMRT.Gonad quality was measured by determining <strong>the</strong> gonad color and granularity of <strong>the</strong> testorganisms. For gonad color, higher values indicate brighter yellow colors which are consideredof better quality for <strong>the</strong> gonads. In <strong>the</strong> Munsell Color Chart, <strong>the</strong> value of 8 has <strong>the</strong> brightestyellow and becomes paler as <strong>the</strong> value decreases to 1. Results show that <strong>the</strong> fresh diettreatment (Treatment I) significantly had brighter yellow color (p = 0.05) than Treatments II andIII. However, in a follow-up study (Asia 2009) to optimize <strong>the</strong> feed ration of <strong>the</strong> organisms, <strong>the</strong>effect of natural food and prepared Sargassum sp. diet at 4.0 to 5.0% BW*day-1 ongonadosomatic index and gonad color was comparable (p


E-International Scientific Research Journal, VOLUME – IV, ISSUE- 3, 2012, ISSN 2094-1749WATER PARAMETERSThe water parameters which are believed to have influences on <strong>the</strong> growth of <strong>the</strong> testorganisms such as dissolved oxygen, water temperature, salinity and pH were monitored during<strong>the</strong> course of <strong>the</strong> study (Table 6). The dissolved oxygen ranged from 5.12 to 8.43 mg*L-1throughout <strong>the</strong> culture period with an average of 6.47 mg*L-1 while <strong>the</strong> temperature rangedfrom 25.00 to 30.30 oC with an average of 27.94 oC. An increasing trend in dissolved oxygenand temperature was observed during <strong>the</strong> study period. For temperature, <strong>the</strong> increasing trendmay be due to <strong>the</strong> onset of summer. Salinity ranged from 33.00 to 35.00 ppt with an average of34.60 ppt while pH ranged from 7.0 to 8.0 with an average of 7.5 throughout <strong>the</strong> cultureperiod. The measurements of said parameters are within <strong>the</strong> favorable range for <strong>the</strong> growthand survival of <strong>the</strong> test organisms.Table 6. Water parameters monitored in <strong>the</strong> culture of <strong>the</strong> sea urchin T. gratilla for four MCP.ParametersDissolved Oxygen Range(mg*L-1)MeanWater Temperature Range(oC) MeanSalinity (ppt) RangeMeanpHRangeMeanMonthsFebruary March April May June5.12 – 6.98 5.76 – 6.50 5.41 – 6.97 6.55 – 8.43 5.81 – 7.496.13 6.16 6.20 7.14 6.7225.40-28.87 25.00-27.83 29.80-30.00 27.60-28.00 29.60-30.3026.48 25.53 29.87 27.82 30.04-----33.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0-----7.0 8.0 7.5 7.5 7.5CORRELATION ANALYSESIn order to determine <strong>the</strong> degree of relationships that exist among <strong>the</strong> somatic andgonad growth and quality and <strong>the</strong> various water parameters, a correlation analysis was done asshown in Table 7. Observed water parameters such as dissolved oxygen, temperature, salinityand pH were within <strong>the</strong> favorable ranges for growth and survival of T. gratilla. Significantpositive correlation existed between wet weight and equatorial test diameter (r=0.78, p=0.01)and polar test diameter (r=0.97, p=0.0001). Likewise, equatorial test diameter and polar testdiameter are significantly positively related (r=0.80, p=0.01). Wet weight and gonadosomaticindex were also positively related (r=0.70, p=0.04); polar test diameter and gonadosomaticindex (r=.0.70, p=0.03); wet weight and gonad color (r=0.80, p=0.01); polar test diameter andgonad color (r=0.84, p=0.004); dissolved oxygen and wet weight (r=0.81, p=0.01); and dissolvedoxygen and polar test diameter (r=0.80, p=0.01). On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, water temperature had asignificantly negative correlation with gonad color (r=-0.69, p=0.04).224


E-International Scientific Research Journal, VOLUME – IV, ISSUE- 3, 2012, ISSN 2094-1749Table 7. Correlation analysis of <strong>the</strong> different somatic and gonad growth and quality with <strong>the</strong>various water parameters.Pearson Correlation Coefficients, N = 9Prob > |r| under H0: Rho=0Wwt Etd Ptd GSI Color Gran DO TempWwt 1.0000 0.7825 0.9662 0.6953 0.7989 0.2664 0.8133 -0.33690.0127


E-International Scientific Research Journal, VOLUME – IV, ISSUE- 3, 2012, ISSN 2094-1749CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONSThe prepared diets were comparable with <strong>the</strong> fresh Sargassum sp. natural food in termsof somatic growth. For gonad growth and color, <strong>the</strong> fresh natural food gave better results;however in a follow-up study of Asia (2009) on optimizing <strong>the</strong> prepared feed ration, <strong>the</strong>prepared dried diet given at 4 to 5% BW/day was comparable with <strong>the</strong> fresh food in both <strong>the</strong>somatic and gonad growth and quality performances of <strong>the</strong> organism. Prepared natural dietscan be given to <strong>the</strong> organisms in lieu of <strong>the</strong> fresh natural food.The successful introduction of prepared diets for <strong>the</strong> sea urchin T. gratilla can be ofgreat help in <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> land-based aquaculture and stock enhancement of thisorganism for food production. Feeding prepared diets to <strong>the</strong> organism opens opportunities forfur<strong>the</strong>r studies on gonad quality enhancement. Coloring pigments such as carotenoids fromnatural and artificial sources can already be incorporated in <strong>the</strong> diet of <strong>the</strong> organism to improveits quality for market and consumption. This necessitates fur<strong>the</strong>r studies specificallyconcentrating on locally available pigment sources like tomato, squash yellow corn and <strong>the</strong> like.Pearce et al. (2004) found out that <strong>the</strong> green sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis fedwith prepared diet mixed with β-carotene had a significantly better gonad quality than thosefed with kelp. Higher quality gonads command a higher value in <strong>the</strong> world market particularlythat of Japan.The study likewise demonstrated <strong>the</strong> viability of land-based culture of <strong>the</strong> organismusing both <strong>the</strong> fresh natural food and prepared diets. This will be important in sustaining a yearround harvest and possible broodstock source for hatchery and seed stock production. A viableand ready source of seed stock such as a hatchery in <strong>the</strong> northwestern part of Ilocos region isnecessary to carry out fur<strong>the</strong>r studies and cater to <strong>the</strong> needs of <strong>the</strong> increasing adaptors of <strong>the</strong>grow-out culture technology of <strong>the</strong> resource.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThe authors acknowledge <strong>the</strong> support provided by <strong>the</strong> Mariano Marcos State Universityand its President, Dr. Miriam E. Pascua; Dr. Epifania O. Agustin and Dr. Sixto R. Pascua, Jr.,former Directors for Research and Development; Ms. Mary Ann B. Gorospe and to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rstaffs of <strong>the</strong> MMSU Research Directorate for <strong>the</strong>ir numerous assistance in <strong>the</strong> preparation andfinalization of <strong>the</strong> manuscript; and <strong>the</strong> Commission on Higher Education for a travel grant topresent a poster of this paper at <strong>the</strong> 8 th Asian Fisheries Forum, Kochi, India on November 20-23,2007.226


E-International Scientific Research Journal, VOLUME – IV, ISSUE- 3, 2012, ISSN 2094-1749REFERENCESAlava, V. R. 1996. Practical notes in feed formulation. Lecture presented during <strong>the</strong> TrainingCourse on Fish Nutrition, Oct. 23 – Dec. 03, 1996, SEAFDEC, Tigbauan, Iloilo, Philippines.Asia, F. B. 2009. Optimizing prepared feed ration for somatic growth and gonad production of<strong>the</strong> sea urchin Tripneustes gratilla (Linnaeus, 1758). Asian Fisheries Science Journal22(1):71-84.Asia, F. B. and T. Tabije, Jr. 2003. Culture of <strong>the</strong> economically important sea urchin Tripneustesgratilla in Ilocos Norte. Research paper presented during <strong>the</strong> Agency In-house review ofR&D highlights. April 23-25, 2003, MMSU College of Agriculture and Forestry,MMSU, Batac, Ilocos Norte.Bangi, H.G.P. 2001. The effect of adult nutrition on somatic and gonad growth, egg quality andlarval development of <strong>the</strong> sea urchin Tripneustes gratilla Linnaeus 1758 (Echinodermata:Echinoidea). Thesis, Master of Science (Marine Biology), Marine Science Institute,College of Science, University of <strong>the</strong> Philippines. p 18.Blount, C. and D. Worthington. 2002. Identifying individuals of <strong>the</strong> sea urchin Centrostephanusrodgersii with high-quality roe in New South Wales, Australia. Fisheries Research58:341-348.Garvida, J. J. and F. B. Asia. 2004. Somatic growth and gonadal maturity of sea urchin(Tripneustes gratilla) fed with selected species of algae and seagrass in vivo condition.Research paper presented during <strong>the</strong> MMSU Agency In-House Review of R & DHighlights on May 4-7, 2004, Crops Research Laboratory, MMSU, Batac, Ilocos NorteKeesing, J. K. and K. C. Hall. 1998. Review of harvests and status of world sea urchin fisheriespoints to opportunities for aquaculture. J. Shellfish Res, 17:5 pp. 1597-1604.Lozano, J. 1995. Biological cycle and recruitment of Paracentrotus lividus(Echinodermata:Echinoidea) in two contrasting habitats. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Series122:179-191.Pearce, C. M., T. L. Daggett and S. M. C. Robinson. 2002. Effect of binder type andconcentration on prepared feed stability and gonad yield and quality of <strong>the</strong> green seaurchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Aquaculture 205(3-4):301-323.Pearce, C.M., T.L. Daggett and S.M.C. Robinson. 2004. Effect or urchin size and diet on gonadyield and quality in <strong>the</strong> green sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis).Aquaculture 233:337-367.Talaue-McManus, L. and K.P. Kesner. 1995. Valuation of municipal sea urchin fishery andimplications of its collapse. In: Philippine Coastal Resource under Stress. 4th AnnualCommon Property Conference, Manila.227


E-International Scientific Research Journal, VOLUME – IV, ISSUE- 3, 2012, ISSN 2094-1749Appendix Figure 1. Samples of T. gratilla from <strong>the</strong> three treatments after four monthsof culture.Appendix Figure 2. Samples of gonads of T. gratilla from <strong>the</strong> three treatments after fourmonths of culture.228

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!