Nevertheless, he has not bound himself to use these means or any means at all inaccomplishing his plans. In addition, the means by which he accomplishes his ends donot work autonomously, but they are themselves determined by his sovereignty, so thatnothing in creation escapes his attention <strong>and</strong> control.It follows that the proposition, "<strong>Prayer</strong> changes things," is false. <strong>Prayer</strong> does not changeanything. It is God as a person who exercises his omnipotence to change things, <strong>and</strong> notthe human act of prayer that changes them. Also, prayer does not change God, since he isimmutable in all his attributes <strong>and</strong> decrees, <strong>and</strong> he has determined in eternity all that hewill do.Some passages appear to say that our prayers can change God's mind – until we examinethem more carefully. For example, after the people of Israel had sinned by making <strong>and</strong>worshiping the golden calf, God says to Moses, "Now leave me alone so that my angermay burn against them <strong>and</strong> that I may destroy them. Then I will make you into a greatnation" (Exodus 32:10). But after hearing the intercession of Moses (v. 11-13), verse 14says, "Then the LORD relented <strong>and</strong> did not bring on his people the disaster he hadthreatened." Therefore, on the surface it appears that God changed his mind in responseto the prayer of Moses.However, the above interpretation contradicts the following two verses on the subject:"God is not a man, that he should lie, nor a son of man, that he should change his mind.Does he speak <strong>and</strong> then not act? Does he promise <strong>and</strong> not fulfill?" (Numbers 23:19); "Hewho is the Glory of Israel does not lie or change his mind; for he is not a man, that heshould change his mind." (1 Samuel 15:29). Since these two verses explicitly state thatGod does not change his mind, we must conclude that the above interpretation saying thatGod does change his mind must be false, even without further argument.Nevertheless, for the sake of confirmation, we may directly deal with the passage fromExodus, <strong>and</strong> show we can arrive at the same conclusion, that God does not change hismind after all. Now, Jacob says in Genesis 49:10, "The scepter will not depart fromJudah, nor the ruler's staff from between his feet, until he comes to whom it belongs <strong>and</strong>the obedience of the nations is his." This is understood as predicting the lineage of theMessiah, finding its ultimate fulfillment in Jesus Christ.Exodus 32:10 has God saying that he would destroy the Israelites <strong>and</strong> raise up a newnation through Moses. But Moses was a Levi, which means that God had never plannedto raise up a new nation through Moses, <strong>and</strong> only several verses later, it turned out that hedid not have to. 43 W. Bingham Hunter is thus correct when he says, "My conviction isthat references to God's 'repenting,' 'relenting' or 'changing his mind' in Scripture are43 However, it does not follow that God lied to Moses in Exodus 32:10, since if Moses had not interceded,God could have indeed carried out his pronouncement against the Israelites <strong>and</strong> destroyed them all. But thatJacob had already said what he said in Genesis 49:10 meant that there was no possibility that God wouldhave carried out Exodus 32:10; therefore, unless God had chosen some other way to prevent carrying outExodus 32:10, he had already determined that Moses would intercede, <strong>and</strong> there was no possibility thatMoses would not have done it.32
figures of speech; technically speaking, they are anthropopathisms – expressions whichexplain God in terms usually used to describe human emotions." 44God is sovereign, meaning that he determines <strong>and</strong> controls everything. Since this is true,it follows that everything about a person's prayer has also been determined by God. If itappears that God is responding to a prayer, it is because God has decided that he wouldact in history by means of this prayer, <strong>and</strong> this prayer has also been determined <strong>and</strong>caused by him to occur in precisely the way that it occurs. Therefore, prayer does notchange things, <strong>and</strong> prayer does not change God. From God's perspective, prayer is aneffect caused by God, which may lead to other effects that are also caused by God. <strong>Prayer</strong>itself is not a cause that causes God to act; rather, the person who prays does so becauseGod is acting on him <strong>and</strong> causing him to pray.Many people's idea of prayer amounts to thinking that, "In prayer a human being seeks toassert self-will over the will of God." 45 Stanley Grenz observes, "Some <strong>Christian</strong>s fail tosee this conflict as in any way problematic. They readily admit adhering to exactly thisunderst<strong>and</strong>ing of prayer. Certain evangelical <strong>and</strong> charismatic circles describe prayer as atechnique for bending the divine will." 46 To the extent that one's idea of prayer resemblesthis description, he has altogether misunderstood the nature of God, <strong>Christian</strong>ity, <strong>and</strong>prayer. We must completely ab<strong>and</strong>on <strong>and</strong> clear away from our minds the idea that prayeris "for bending the divine will." The divine will cannot be bent, <strong>and</strong> it cannot be changed;our idea of prayer must correspond to this reality. <strong>Prayer</strong> is meaningful because "God hasdecided to include humans in the divine program for the world," 47 <strong>and</strong> not because heneeds our permission or request to act.Therefore, we must define prayer not as changing the will of God, but we must thinkabout it from another perspective. A more biblical view of prayer is to think of it as onepossible means in the process by which God gives us what he wants, or achieves someother purpose of his. This may include his plan to grant us some material goods, or it ispart of the process that effects our sanctification.Such a view of prayer is correct because it is what the Bible teaches, <strong>and</strong> it is consistentwith other biblical doctrines. A view of prayer may appear to be derived from severalisolated biblical passages, but if it contradicts the attributes of God or other biblicaldoctrines, then it must not be a biblical view of prayer, <strong>and</strong> those biblical passages musthave been mish<strong>and</strong>led.Failing to observe this, some have derived principles <strong>and</strong> definitions on prayer that theyfind meaningful, but by the time they are done, there is no room left for the <strong>Christian</strong> Godin their theology of prayer, so that they have the "prayer" that they like, but no God. Suchis the case with a view of prayer affirming that God changes his mind in response to our44 W. Bingham Hunter, The God Who Hears; InterVarsity Press, 1986; p. 52.45 Stanley J. Grenz, <strong>Prayer</strong>: The Cry for the Kingdom; Hendrickson Publishers, Inc., 1988; p. 32.46 Ibid., p. 32.47 Ibid., p. 44.33
- Page 1 and 2: PRAYER & REVELATIONVincent CheungCo
- Page 3 and 4: PREFACEIn his book, With Christ in
- Page 5 and 6: PRAYER AND THE TRIUNE GODThe doctri
- Page 7 and 8: interpretation of Christianity, the
- Page 9 and 10: of metaphysics (or reality), which
- Page 11 and 12: nevertheless sound reluctant to blu
- Page 13 and 14: 2. PRAYING TO THE FATHERThis, then,
- Page 15 and 16: The above leads us to reject the no
- Page 17 and 18: I urge you to read the sermon, "Sin
- Page 19 and 20: 3. PRAYING BY THE SPIRITFor through
- Page 21 and 22: First, we need to clarify what "gro
- Page 23 and 24: The passage indeed implies that bel
- Page 25 and 26: the limitations of our minds. Howev
- Page 27 and 28: It is significant that when believe
- Page 29 and 30: PRAYER AND THE DIVINE NATUREIn the
- Page 31: 4. PRAYER AND SOVEREIGNTYI form the
- Page 35 and 36: 5. PRAYER AND OMNISCIENCEAnd when y
- Page 37 and 38: does not provide justification for
- Page 39 and 40: that the man may receive the money
- Page 41 and 42: Whatever we do, the principle remai
- Page 43 and 44: this period of redemptive history i
- Page 45 and 46: itself - that is, the physical obje
- Page 47 and 48: 7. PRAYER AND MOTIVATIONAnd when yo
- Page 49 and 50: sin that lingers. You must struggle
- Page 51 and 52: 8. PRAYER AND OBEDIENCEIf anyone tu
- Page 53 and 54: commands and remain in his love." I
- Page 55 and 56: 9. PRAYER AND PERSISTENCEThen Jesus
- Page 57 and 58: necessarily apply to our relationsh
- Page 59 and 60: Then Jesus told his disciples a par
- Page 61 and 62: to it intelligible information, 66
- Page 63 and 64: PRAYER AND THE INNER LIFEThe inner
- Page 65 and 66: 10. PRAYER AND EXPERIENCEOne day Je
- Page 67 and 68: cannot tell me if you can catch all
- Page 69 and 70: Would you condemn me to justify you
- Page 71 and 72: elieve! Trust God! This is what God
- Page 73 and 74: Our culture favors the free express
- Page 75 and 76: we cannot overemphasize the importa