Third Edition Spring 2013 - Institute of East Asian Studies, UC ...

REFERENCESBoesche, Roger. “Kautilya’s Arthashastra on War and Diplomacyin Ancient India.” The Journal of Military History. 67. no. 1(2003): 9-37.Burrow, Thomas. “Kautilya and Chanakya.” Annals of theBhandarkar Oriental Research Institute. (1968): 48-49.Gautam, P.K. Institute for Defense Studies and Analyses, “EndogenousPolitico-Cultural Resources: Kautilya’s Arthashastra andIndia’s Strategic Culture.” Last modified 2012. Accessed November10, 2012. http://www.idsa.in/event/KautilyasArthashastraandIndiasStrategicCulture.“India needs to develop its own doctrine for strategic autonomy:NSA.” The Economic Times, October 18, 2012. http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-10-18/news/34555557_1_strategic-autonomy-shiv-shankar-menon-india-today.Kautilya. Arthashastra. Translated by R. Shamasastry. Bangalore:Government Press, 1915.Kautilya’s Arthashastra: Its Contemporary Relevance. Pune:Indian Merchants’ Chamber and Indian Merchants’ Chamber EconomicResearch and Training Foundation, 2005.Kumar, N. Siva, and U.S. Rao. “Guidelines for Value Based Managementin Kautilya’s Arthashastra.” Journal of Business Ethics. 15.no. 4 (1996): 415-423. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25072765.Matthews, Eric. Weber: Selections in Translation. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1978.Starzl, Timothy, and Krishna Dhir. “Strategic Planning 2300Years Ago: The Strategy of Kautilya.” Management InternationalReview. 26. no. 4 (1986): 70-77.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40227819.Trautmann, Thomas. India: Brief History of Civilization.New York: Oxford University Press, Inc., 2011.Waldauer, Charles, William Zahka, and Surendra Pal. “Kautilya’sArthashastra: A Neglected Precursor to Classical Economics.”Indian Economic Review. 31. no. 1 (1996): 101-108. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29793735.Ainu and the Metaphor of Indigeneity:History, Science, Law, and BodiesValerie BlackAbstractDrawing on Max Black’s interaction theory, this paper explores thetransformative properties of metaphor, and its ability to alter the perception ofits original components through the interaction of comparison itself. Identifyinga metaphoric underpinning to conceptions of indigeneity, I examine past andrecent shifts of the status of Ainu in Japan in order to show the power of thisunexamined metaphoric relationship in impacting Ainu perceptions, includingself-perceptions. The metaphor of indigeneity does not operate exclusively tothe detriment of the populations it symbolically links. By examining the role ofmetaphor in constructing and reconstructing Ainu identities, and establishing therelationship between these identities and Ainu history, science, law, and bodies, Iseek to show the potency of metaphor in shaping, as opposed to merely reflecting,reality.Introduction: Indigeneity as MetaphorI seek to call attention to the mechanisms of how indigenousidentities (including self-identities) are constructed, andby whom. By examining the role of metaphor in shaping Ainu indigenousidentities, and analyzing the corresponding productionof Ainu identities within history, science, law, and ethnography, Isuggest it is possible to uncover the function of metaphor, and todetect unexamined pathways through which power is both soughtand subverted.69 Ramanathan Veerappan Kautilya’s Arthashastra 70