13.07.2015 Views

NATIONAL LAB RELATIONS BOARD - National Labor Relations ...

NATIONAL LAB RELATIONS BOARD - National Labor Relations ...

NATIONAL LAB RELATIONS BOARD - National Labor Relations ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IV. STATISTICAL RECORD OF BOA:RD AL-IIVPTY 15with the certification of bargaining representatives. Half of theA. F. of L. cases, numbering 1,487 and affecting approximately onefourthof workers involved, were settled informally.The pattern of disposition for the 2,881 C. I. 0. cases closed duringthe past fiscal year differed from that for A. F. of L. cases only bythe appearance of a relatively large number of cases closed afterformal action. This difference is accounted for by the number ofC. I. 0. cases in which compliance was secured only after court action.The percentage of all cases closed in this category was 2.8, contrastedwith 4.6 percent for C. I. 0. affiliates. The C. I. 0. percentage waseven larger in terms of workers involved, i. e., 7.3.B. UNFAIR <strong>LAB</strong>OR PRACTICE CASESTypes of unfair labor praetices.—Unf air labor practice cases ariseunder section 8 of the act, which states that five enumerated practiceson the part of employers shall be considered "unfair": (1) Interferingwith, restraining, or coercing employees in the exercise of theirright to self-organization ; 4 (2) t'dominating or interfering with theformation or administration of any labor organization ; (3) discriminatingagainst employees for membership in any labor organization;(4) discriminating against employees for filing charges orgiving testimony under the act; and (5) refusing to bargain collectivelywith duly chosen labor representatives.In previous years, charges of discrimination in violation of section8 (3) have been the most numerous type of unfair labor practicealleged in cases before the Board. During the past year this typeof charge continued to be the most important numerically. Out of2,902 cases pending at the beginning of the year, 2,131 involvedcharges of discrimination under section 8 (3) ; 1,233 cases involvedcharges of refusal to bargain collectively ; 710 involved charges ofcompany domination 70 involved charges of discrimination for filingcharges or giving testimony under the Act.The five charges appeared in various combinations, the most numerousof which was 8 (1) and 8 (3), including 1,004 cases. An additional616 cases involved charges of discrimination together with chargesof refusal to bargain collectively. Alleged refusal to bargain collectivelywas the issue in an additional 377 cases, involving onlycharges 8 (1) and 8 (5). Charges of company domination in theformation of labor organizations were involved in 184 cases; 277 additionalcases involved both charges of discrimination and domination.Various combinations of charges were found in the few remainingcases pending June 30.The distribution of these 5 types of charges among the 3,934 unfairlabor practice cases received during the year was very muchthe same as the distribution found among the pending cases. Chargesof discrimination in violation of section 8 (3) appeared in 2,671 cases.Charges of refusal to bargain collectively, the second most numerousgroup, appeared in less than half this number, in 1,253 cases. Allegationsof company domination appeared in 452 cases, and the specialtype of discrimination under section 8 (4) appeared in 45 cases.AB 'charges Include 8 (1).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!