13.07.2015 Views

Committee of the Whole - Township of Strathroy-Caradoc

Committee of the Whole - Township of Strathroy-Caradoc

Committee of the Whole - Township of Strathroy-Caradoc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1MUNICIPALITY OF STRATHROY-CARADOCCouncillor Brennan, ChairMINUTES OFCOMMITTEE OF THE WHOLEFINANCE MEETINGMONDAY, DECEMBER 12 th , 20115:30 P.M.COMMITTEE ROOM52 FRANK STREET, STRATHROYAGENDA1. ROLL CALL (All cell phones, pagers, etc. are to be turned <strong>of</strong>f.)Present:Also present:Mayor Joanne VanderheydenDeputy Mayor Brad RichardsCouncillor Marie BakerCouncillor John BrennanCouncillor Dave CameronCouncillor Steve PelkmanCouncillor Larry CowanCouncillor Steve DausettCouncillor Neil FlegelRalph Coe, Chief Administrative OfficerAngela Toth, Director <strong>of</strong> Corporate Services/ClerkJane McPherson, Director <strong>of</strong> Financial Services/TreasurerKerry Maloney, Assistant Corporate Services DirectorStephen Riczu2. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST - None3. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE WRITE OFFSThe Director <strong>of</strong> Financial Services (DFS)/Treasurer provided a reportregarding three (3) outstanding invoices issued prior to 2011 that arenot collectible. Eventhough <strong>the</strong> accounts would be removed from <strong>the</strong><strong>Committee</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Whole</strong> Finance Minutes Dec 12 11


2books, if <strong>the</strong> circumstances change attempts will be made to recover<strong>the</strong> amounts owed.Moved by Councillors Dausett and CameronTHAT: Finance <strong>Committee</strong> recommends approval to write-<strong>of</strong>finvoices totaling $145.55 based on <strong>the</strong> report dated November 30 th ,2011 from <strong>the</strong> Director <strong>of</strong> Financial Services/Treasurer.Carried.4. 2012 DRAFT BUDGET OVERVIEW UPDATEThe Chief Administrative Officer and <strong>the</strong> DFS/Treasurer reviewed <strong>the</strong>subject update circulated with <strong>the</strong> agenda package showing <strong>the</strong>impact on taxation is an increase <strong>of</strong> 6.2%; made up <strong>of</strong> increases tooperations and maintenance 3.23%, debt 2.37% and taxation andadjustments 3.90%, and a reduction in capital <strong>of</strong> 3.31%.The changes in tax dollars required is currently $740,284 which is6.2% more than what was budgeted for 2011. Tax rates wouldincrease 1.49%. The latest assessment statistics reflect a 4%increase. Based on <strong>the</strong> estimates rates for 2012, a house assessedat $200,000 will increase in value to $208,000 and <strong>the</strong> resultingincrease would be $78.01, or 5.81% for <strong>the</strong> municipal portion.In response to questions posed at <strong>the</strong> November 28 th meetingregarding recommended levels for reserves and reserve funds amunicipality should have, <strong>the</strong> DFS/Treasurer checked with ourauditor and was provided with <strong>the</strong> following information:- Capital reserves/reserve funds should equal <strong>the</strong>accumulated depreciation/amortization.Our reserves are estimated to be $10.2 million by <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 2012,and by this recommendation <strong>the</strong>y should be $76.4 million. We couldachieve this level if we were to raise $ 4 million per year which wouldcover our yearly depreciation/amortization costs. We currently don’traise any tax dollars towards this.- Future Needs Reserve should be 5 -15% <strong>of</strong> taxationrevenues.This reserve is established by accumulating any yearly surplus, andprovides a buffer in <strong>the</strong> event <strong>of</strong> an unforeseen expense. Based onthis recommendation we should have $1.2 million in that reserve,and we have only $20,000. We have been using money from thisfund to <strong>of</strong>fset tax increases over <strong>the</strong> last few years.- Accumulated depreciation/ amortization should beapproximately 30% <strong>of</strong> our capital assets.Ours is 37%. This means that we aren’t spending quite enough oncapital projects to keep up with <strong>the</strong> growing depreciation on ouraging infrastructure.<strong>Committee</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Whole</strong> Finance Minutes Dec 12 11


3FINANCIAL INDICATOR REVIEWThe Ministry <strong>of</strong> Municipal Affairs and Housing prepares a FinancialIndicator Review yearly. Total Reserves and Discretionary Reservesare expressed as a percentage <strong>of</strong> Operating Expenses. In 2009 wewere at 58.6% with <strong>the</strong> median for our group being 64.8%. At <strong>the</strong>end <strong>of</strong> 2012 we will drop to 34%. This trend is pushing us to a higherrisk level. Members were concerned with <strong>the</strong> information dating backto 2009 and asked that up-to-date indicators be provided as soon as<strong>the</strong>y are available.Members were provided with a pie chart showing where <strong>the</strong> taxdollars would come from based on <strong>the</strong> information provided at thismeeting: commercial 10.26%, industrial 5.82%, farm 3.13%,pipeline 2.75%, residential 74.84%, multi-residential 3.19% andmanaged forest .01%.Reference: for fur<strong>the</strong>r review and consideration.5. REPORTS ON QUESTIONS FROM NOVEMBER 28 th MEETINGReports were provided for questions that arose at <strong>the</strong> Finance<strong>Committee</strong> meeting November 28 th , as follows:a) Melbourne Agricultural Society (MAS) - report from <strong>the</strong>Community Development Manager dated December 6 th , 2011asking MAS how <strong>the</strong> proposed 2012 donation is to be spent(operational and maintenance expenses vs. special eventrelated expenses) in order to clarify <strong>the</strong>ir request for funding.The communication also requested an update on <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>ir Ontario Trillium Foundation grant application.The MAS was informed that <strong>the</strong>re is currently no precedent forsupporting <strong>the</strong> ongoing operating expenses associated withfacilities owned and operated by community groups. Althougho<strong>the</strong>r service clubs and organizations may receive donationsupon request for o<strong>the</strong>r activities (ie. events and festivals),<strong>the</strong>re is currently no agreement in place with any communitygroup to sustain operations or maintain <strong>the</strong>ir facilities. Thecommunication also requested an update on <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>irOntario Trillium Foundation grant application.The communication was received and circulated by Mr. Britanto members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MAS for <strong>the</strong>ir input with <strong>the</strong> intention <strong>of</strong>formulating a response to Finance <strong>Committee</strong>. This resulted in<strong>the</strong> attached responses from Mr. Britan and Past-PresidentKevin Pierce. These responses have been included for <strong>the</strong>review <strong>of</strong> Finance <strong>Committee</strong> at <strong>the</strong> request <strong>of</strong> Mr. Britan. Theyoutline <strong>the</strong>ir understanding <strong>of</strong> an arrangement that <strong>the</strong> MAS<strong>Committee</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Whole</strong> Finance Minutes Dec 12 11


4indicated was made with <strong>the</strong> previous Council regarding a fiveyear commitment for funding to assist with <strong>the</strong> operation andmaintenance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> facility. Mr. Britan and Mr. Pierce also drawcomparisons in <strong>the</strong>ir letters to <strong>the</strong> financial support that iscurrently provided by <strong>the</strong> municipality to cover <strong>the</strong> operatingexpenses associated with <strong>the</strong> <strong>Caradoc</strong> Community Centre for<strong>the</strong> residents <strong>of</strong> Mount Brydges.Mr. Britan also informed (in a separate correspondence) staffthat <strong>the</strong> MAS was successful in <strong>the</strong>ir recent grant application to<strong>the</strong> Ontario Trillium Foundation, and that <strong>the</strong>y were awarded$15,100.00 to be put toward renovations and upgrades <strong>of</strong>equipment in <strong>the</strong> kitchen area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hall. Mr. Britan indicatedthat with <strong>the</strong>se funds, all repairs and improvements to <strong>the</strong>building will be complete, and that no fur<strong>the</strong>r assistance wouldbe required for repairs in 2012. Mr. Britan clarified that <strong>the</strong>intent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> $15,000.00 request to Finance <strong>Committee</strong> forconsideration in <strong>the</strong> 2012 budget was for operational expensesrelated to utilities and building maintenance, as per <strong>the</strong>previously established understanding with former Mayor Veale.Two budget outlines were provided by Mr. Britan to separate<strong>the</strong> revenue and expenses associated with <strong>the</strong> Melbourne Hallfrom those associated with <strong>the</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Melbourne Fairevent.Upon fur<strong>the</strong>r review <strong>of</strong> correspondence between <strong>the</strong> MAS and<strong>the</strong> Municipality over <strong>the</strong> last several years, it would appearthat an understanding was reached with former Mayor Vealeand subsequently with Finance <strong>Committee</strong> in September <strong>of</strong>2009 whereby <strong>the</strong> MAS would maintain <strong>the</strong> operations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Melbourne Fair with support from <strong>the</strong> Municipality to cover <strong>the</strong>cost <strong>of</strong> operating <strong>the</strong> main Fair building (Melbourne Hall) for<strong>the</strong> 2010 year. There is no indication in <strong>the</strong> minutes,correspondence or elsewhere regarding <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> a fiveyear commitment, or even a defined annual contributionamount. Amounts requested in following years were dictatedby <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MAS in that particular year, and werealways subject to available funds and <strong>the</strong> discretion <strong>of</strong> Council.After inquiring with <strong>the</strong> Director <strong>of</strong> Recreation regarding <strong>the</strong>comparison between <strong>the</strong> <strong>Caradoc</strong> Community Centre (CCC)operating model and <strong>the</strong> Melbourne Hall, it is important to notethat <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CCC facility by community groups iscurrently subsidized to an extent by <strong>the</strong> Municipality. Althoughprivate users are charged a competitive rate, many localorganizations are not charged (ie. Scouts, Lions, etc.). This isan arrangement that was developed when <strong>the</strong> facility was<strong>Committee</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Whole</strong> Finance Minutes Dec 12 11


5established in 1990. As such, <strong>the</strong> suggestion was made by MASmembers that consideration should be given to evaluating <strong>the</strong>irrequest for financial assistance in light <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r municipalcontributions, ra<strong>the</strong>r than in isolation.In consultation with Councillor Cowan and municipal staffregarding this issue, <strong>the</strong> Community Development Managerrecommended to Finance <strong>Committee</strong> that a formal agreementwith <strong>the</strong> MAS be established should <strong>the</strong> decision be made toprovide financial assistance for <strong>the</strong> maintenance and operation<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Melbourne Hall. This would serve to clarify <strong>the</strong> position <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> municipality, defining <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> annualcontribution and <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> commitment, as well as <strong>the</strong>parameters surrounding public use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> facility (subsidizedvs. paid use).Councillor Cowan said he thinks <strong>the</strong> municipality has anobligation to provide assistance to MAS. He said it appears <strong>the</strong>building is in good condition and that are we now getting morecomplete financial statements separating operating expensesfrom <strong>the</strong> Fair expenses.Moved by Councillor Cowan and Mayor VanderheydenTHAT: Finance <strong>Committee</strong> recommends that $15,000 beprovided to Melbourne Agricultural Society in 2012 foroperating its buildings and that an agreement be establisheddefining <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> annual contribution and that <strong>the</strong>term <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> agreement will expire on December 31, 2014.Carried.b) Fire Department various matters - report from <strong>the</strong> FireChief regarding <strong>the</strong> Fire Department Budget, an update from<strong>the</strong> County regarding fire and police dispatch services; andvolunteer firefighter training sessions.The Fire Chief said he reduced <strong>the</strong> Fire Conventions andSeminars budget by $2,000 as requested. Regarding <strong>the</strong>transfer <strong>of</strong> funds from <strong>the</strong> Fire Equipment Reserve, <strong>the</strong> FireChief said it is his understanding that monies collected for thisreserve fund came from public donations, and memorialdonations, for special projects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fire department notnormally funded through <strong>the</strong> budget process. The Fire Chiefsaid he was recently made aware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> amount in <strong>the</strong> reservefund and is hoping to use some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> funds for training roomimprovements at <strong>the</strong> various stations as well as possiblycontribute funds to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Strathroy</strong> Station Firefighter Associationfor <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> a proposed community information sign<strong>Committee</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Whole</strong> Finance Minutes Dec 12 11


6at <strong>the</strong> <strong>Strathroy</strong> Station. The Fire Chief is asking that $12,000<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reserve fund be allocated for <strong>the</strong> air pack upgrades and<strong>the</strong> balance to be maintained to fund o<strong>the</strong>r non-operatingbudget projects.Regarding an update from <strong>the</strong> County about fire and policedispatch services, <strong>the</strong> Fire Chief reported that he was asked byCouncil to investigate possible cost savings by utilizing <strong>the</strong>County Fire Dispatch system for fire dispatch in <strong>Strathroy</strong>-<strong>Caradoc</strong>. The Fire Chief’s research involves <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> FireDispatch only and not Police Dispatch as Police have <strong>the</strong>ir ownsystem, needs and 911 responsibilities. The Fire Chief has hadnumerous conversations with <strong>the</strong> County Emergency ServiceDirector over <strong>the</strong> past few months and extensive research hasbeen conducted in <strong>the</strong> review <strong>of</strong> how our existingcommunication system could be incorporated into <strong>the</strong> Countysystem. The only outstanding issue that has to be finalized is<strong>the</strong> costs and impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposal on <strong>the</strong> London FireDepartment Operations. Although <strong>the</strong> County owns <strong>the</strong>communication system infrastructure utilized by <strong>the</strong> County,<strong>the</strong> London Fire Department provides <strong>the</strong> dispatch centre and<strong>the</strong> personnel needed for <strong>the</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> service. Numerousrequests have been made to <strong>the</strong> London Fire Department for<strong>the</strong>ir input into <strong>the</strong> feasibility and costs associated with <strong>the</strong>initiative; London Fire has been slow to respond to ourinquiries. Additional call volume information was forwarded toLondon Fire on November 17, 2011 for <strong>the</strong>ir review andano<strong>the</strong>r inquiry was made on December 5 th for an update butno response has been received yet. The Fire Chief will continueto attempt to ga<strong>the</strong>r more information for council review assoon as possible.Regarding <strong>the</strong> feasibility for fire volunteers to meet bi-weeklyra<strong>the</strong>r than weekly and if <strong>the</strong>re is a savings to be realized withthis type <strong>of</strong> change, <strong>the</strong> Fire Chief reported that each Station <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Fire Department is obligated to conduct 20 regular trainingsessions per year with additional voluntary special trainingsessions conducted as required as opportunities becomeavailable. Additionally each station is made up <strong>of</strong> four squadsconsisting <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>ficer and a complement <strong>of</strong> firefighters. Eachsquad is responsible to be on-call for one weekend per monthto ensure that a minimum compliment <strong>of</strong> firefighters isavailable to respond on any given weekend. This Duty Squad isresponsible to conduct a maintenance review <strong>of</strong> apparatus andequipment during <strong>the</strong>ir on-call week. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this is toensure that all equipment and trucks have been properly<strong>Committee</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Whole</strong> Finance Minutes Dec 12 11


7maintained and are in service ready condition for anyemergency call that might be received.The Fire Chief believes that <strong>the</strong> training and maintenanceprograms developed is a reasonable expectation <strong>of</strong> duediligence for <strong>the</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> fire protection to our communityand to ensure <strong>the</strong> safety <strong>of</strong> our volunteer firefighters andshould not be modified.One area that cost savings could be realized (approximately$50,000.00 per year) is <strong>the</strong> elimination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> on-call weekendthat firefighters are obligated to participate in. Considerablethought however should be given to <strong>the</strong> elimination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> oncallweekend.This initiative was developed at <strong>the</strong> request <strong>of</strong> council manyyears ago (prior to amalgamation) when it was found that onsome weekends a shortage <strong>of</strong> firefighters was such that <strong>the</strong>rewas no guarantee that at least one truck was available torespond to an emergency. Council may wish to initiate a studyinto <strong>the</strong> need for <strong>the</strong> continuation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> on-call weekendrequirement in <strong>the</strong> future as a means <strong>of</strong> reducing operationalcosts in future budget years.After a brief discussion <strong>the</strong> following motions were passed:Moved by Councillors Cowan and CameronTHAT: staff determines <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> weekend fire callsreceived over <strong>the</strong> past two years and report back to <strong>Committee</strong>on any cost savings that may be realized while posing aminimal impact on <strong>the</strong> municipality.Carried.Moved by Councillor Baker and Deputy Mayor RichardsTHAT: Finance <strong>Committee</strong> recommends that $12,000 beallocated from <strong>the</strong> Fire Equipment Reserve to fund air packupgrades in 2012.Carried.c) Status <strong>of</strong> certain roads - report from <strong>the</strong> Roads Managerregarding Blackjack Drive, Cooks Road, Parkhouse Drive andTroops Road.The following information was provided as requested andprovides an overview with respect to anticipated capital roadworks:1. Blackjack DriveA culvert replacement is required. A decision will berequired to keep <strong>the</strong> road open or to close <strong>the</strong> road. A<strong>Committee</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Whole</strong> Finance Minutes Dec 12 11


8report to Transportation <strong>Committee</strong> will be prepared as soonas we receive from <strong>the</strong> M.O.E. and Oceans and Fisheriesapproval to proceed. There is no funding in <strong>the</strong> 2012budget. It is possible that a decision may not be made until<strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 2012; this would <strong>the</strong>n need to be budgeted in2013.2. Cooks RoadThis road requires re-alignment. Land purchase isnecessary to move <strong>the</strong> road over and re-align <strong>the</strong>intersection. A report to Transportation <strong>Committee</strong> will beprepared in <strong>the</strong> near future which will determine <strong>the</strong> course<strong>of</strong> action and <strong>the</strong> funds required. We could ei<strong>the</strong>r purchaselands or expropriate <strong>the</strong> land required; however, <strong>the</strong>re is no2012 budget. Once <strong>Committee</strong> decides <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> action,this will take some time to achieve; <strong>the</strong>re will need to be anallocation in <strong>the</strong> 2013 budget.3. Parkhouse Drive and Troops RoadPreliminary work is being done on <strong>the</strong> culverts and drainagecurrently funded through <strong>the</strong> Operations Budget. Somesurveying is required to realign Troops Road and <strong>the</strong>Parkhouse Drive intersection.Funds should be budgeted for <strong>the</strong>se road improvements in<strong>the</strong> 2013/2014 budget. Development charges collectedwhen <strong>the</strong> lots are sold will help fund improvements.A report will be provided to <strong>the</strong> Transportation <strong>Committee</strong>recommending <strong>the</strong> work to be done in 2013/2014, by thattime we may know what <strong>the</strong> Developer will contributetoward road improvements.Reference: for information.6. FULL COST RECOVERY - PROPOSED PLANNING FEESPaul Hicks, Planner, provided more information on proposed planningfees, as requested at <strong>the</strong> Finance <strong>Committee</strong> meeting November 28 th .To recover <strong>the</strong> full expenditure would require that planning fees beredistributed and raised overall by an estimated 25% to cover 100%<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expenses. The current fees were approved in 2009.It is proposed that <strong>the</strong> 2012 planning fees be (<strong>the</strong> current fee is inbrackets): Official Plan Amendment $3,650 ($2,700); Zoning BylawAmendment $2,100 ($1,600); Site Plan Approval $1,350 ($1,000);Plan <strong>of</strong> Subdivision $4,700 ($3,700); Consent $1,750 ($1,300);Minor Variance $700 ($600); Part Lot Control $600 ($500); Removal<strong>Committee</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Whole</strong> Finance Minutes Dec 12 11


9<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holding Symbol $350 ($250); and Renewal <strong>of</strong> a TemporaryUse $500 (300).Moved by Councillors Cowan and CameronTHAT: Finance <strong>Committee</strong> recommends going to full cost recoveryfor planning fees starting January 1, 2012 as proposed by Paul Hicks,Planner in his report dated November 23 rd , 2011; and fur<strong>the</strong>r that abylaw authorizing <strong>the</strong> new fees be prepared for Council approvalDecember 19 th , 2011.Carried.7. 2012 DRAFT CAPITAL BUDGET AND 5-YEAR CAPITAL PLANMembers reviewed an updated report on <strong>the</strong> subject matter includinga report from <strong>the</strong> Director <strong>of</strong> Environmental Services providing moredetails on <strong>the</strong> 2012 infrastructure projects. Information was firstprovided to Finance <strong>Committee</strong> November 18 th .A map showing <strong>the</strong> location <strong>of</strong> proposed capital infrastructure worksfor 2012 was provided at <strong>the</strong> meeting.A summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2012 capital project costs and sources <strong>of</strong> financingproposed are as follows:2012In <strong>the</strong> 2012 Budget year, <strong>the</strong> proposed projects total $6,219,415.- $302,800 will come from taxation- $1,289,000 will come from Gas Tax- $405,150 will come from Development Charges- $609,300 will come from Reserves- $3,236,316 will come from User Fees and water & sewer reserves- $376,849 will come from DonationsThe current following five (5) year capital project forecast is asfollows:2013In <strong>the</strong> 2013 Budget year, <strong>the</strong> proposed projects total $8,137,984- $4,588,600 will come from taxation- $1,991,825 will come from DC’s and Gas Tax- $30,000 will come from Reserves- $1,248,858 will come from User Fees- $278,700 will come from o<strong>the</strong>r sources2014In <strong>the</strong> year 2014, <strong>the</strong> proposed budget for capital projects is$7,708,326.- $6,040,250 will need to come from taxation- $683,170 will come from DC’s and Gas Tax<strong>Committee</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Whole</strong> Finance Minutes Dec 12 11


10- $866,156 will come from user fees- $118,750 will come from o<strong>the</strong>r sources.2015In <strong>the</strong> year 2015, <strong>the</strong> proposed budget for capital projects is$6,843,202.- $5,460,250 will need to come from taxation- $114,000 will come from DC’s and Gas Tax- $1,250,202 will come from user fees- $18,750 will come from o<strong>the</strong>r sources.2016In <strong>the</strong> year 2016, <strong>the</strong> proposed budget for capital projects is$2,367,295- $1,537,750 will need to come from taxation- Nothing has been budgeted from DC’s and Gas Tax- $812,295 will come from user fees- $17,250 will come from o<strong>the</strong>r sources.Reference: for fur<strong>the</strong>r consideration.8. PROPOSED NEXT STEPSCirculate updated Budget package for binders by <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>year (<strong>the</strong> DFS/Treasurer will contact members when hardcopies are available at <strong>the</strong> Town Hall); Budget review and recommendation to Council – January 16,2012, and January 23, 2012 if required; Budget Presentation to Council February 6, 2012 forconsideration and adoption (public notice will be provided).9. SCHEDULING OF MEETINGS Monday, December 19, 2011 – Council followed by <strong>Committee</strong><strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Whole</strong> @ 6:30 pm. Monday, January 9, 2012 – Council followed by <strong>Committee</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> <strong>Whole</strong> @ 6:30 pm. Monday, January 16, 2012 – Finance <strong>Committee</strong> @ 5:30 p.m.10. IN-CAMERA MATTERSMoved by Councillors Baker and DausettTHAT: Finance <strong>Committee</strong> moves In-Camera to consider personaland property matters.Carried.Personal and property matters were discussed.<strong>Committee</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Whole</strong> Finance Minutes Dec 12 11


11At <strong>the</strong> conclusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> In-Camera session <strong>the</strong> following motion waspassed:Moved by Councillors Pelkman and DausettTHAT: Finance <strong>Committee</strong> concludes <strong>the</strong> In-Camera session andreturns to open session.Carried.11. ADJOURNMENTThe meeting adjourned at 7:46 pm on a motion by Councillor Bakerand Deputy Mayor Richards. Carried.________________________Mayor___________________________Clerk/km<strong>Committee</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Whole</strong> Finance Minutes Dec 12 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!