13.07.2015 Views

Advantages and Disadvantages of Mediation in Probate, Trust, and ...

Advantages and Disadvantages of Mediation in Probate, Trust, and ...

Advantages and Disadvantages of Mediation in Probate, Trust, and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the ag<strong>in</strong>g matriarch <strong>of</strong> the family may actually rule (emotionally) with aniron fist <strong>and</strong> thus h<strong>in</strong>der other parties to the mediation from act<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> anymanner that would show disrespect or lack <strong>of</strong> deference.YThe potential power imbalance <strong>in</strong> a mediation may make such an approachparticularly undesirable for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the appropriateness <strong>of</strong> guardianship.For example, a case <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g a petition for the guardianship <strong>of</strong> a parentfiled by one <strong>of</strong> the children may br<strong>in</strong>g a variety <strong>of</strong> factors <strong>in</strong>to play.Properly directed mediation could help the children reach an agreement onwhich <strong>of</strong> them is better suited to serve <strong>in</strong> a guardianship role for the parent.The forum may lead them to see that one <strong>of</strong> them is an appropriate guardian<strong>of</strong> the person, while the other should serve as guardian <strong>of</strong> the parent's property.Thus the use <strong>of</strong> mediation at an early stage may well preserve the sibl<strong>in</strong>gs'ability to work together later for their parent's benefit.On the other h<strong>and</strong>, a major issue <strong>in</strong> such a case may be whether the proposedward needs a guardian at that time. In states that require the appo<strong>in</strong>tment<strong>of</strong> an attorney for a proposed ward, 26 an <strong>in</strong>dividual's <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>ghis or her <strong>in</strong>dependence would be zealously protected by an attorney<strong>in</strong> the formal guardianship proceed<strong>in</strong>g. 27 This zealous advocacy <strong>in</strong> the proposedward's favor may shatter pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g family relationships. 28 Yet, withoutthis protection, there rema<strong>in</strong>s the danger that the court may <strong>in</strong>appropriatelyimpose a guardianship. Were such a case to go to mediation, ideally themediator would seek to protect the proposed ward's <strong>in</strong>terests, as well as the<strong>in</strong>terests <strong>of</strong> the other parties. The mediator, however, would probably opposethe guardianship less vehemently than the attorney <strong>of</strong> the proposed ward. Inaddition, if the children present themselves as capable, car<strong>in</strong>g relatives whowant only the best for their parent, <strong>and</strong> the parent seems to be an angry personwith vacillat<strong>in</strong>g emotions about the guardianship, even a skilled mediatormay fall victim to help<strong>in</strong>g the family reach a result that is <strong>in</strong> the parent's best<strong>in</strong>terests, rather than a result <strong>in</strong> which he truly played an <strong>in</strong>dependent role.The same danger exists when the proposed ward is a m<strong>in</strong>or. An examplefamily manipulation <strong>of</strong> a child's future <strong>in</strong> a mediation context occurred <strong>in</strong> Inre Jason E. 29 The case began with a hear<strong>in</strong>g on whether Jason's parents'rights should be term<strong>in</strong>ated. At the request <strong>of</strong> one parent, the hear<strong>in</strong>g was25. See id. at 79.26. See, e.g., GA. CODE ANN. § 29-5-6(b)(2) (Michie 1993).27. See, e.g., In re Guardianship <strong>of</strong> Herke, No. 16852-2-II (Wash. App. Div. 3 Jan. 19,1999), <strong>in</strong> which the court-appo<strong>in</strong>ted attorney for Ms. Herke strongly opposed the guardianship,even go<strong>in</strong>g so far as to file divorce proceed<strong>in</strong>gs aga<strong>in</strong>st Ms. Herke's husb<strong>and</strong> to discourag<strong>in</strong>g himfrom pursu<strong>in</strong>g the guardianship application.28. See id.29. See generally, In re Jason E., 62 Cal. Rptr. 2d 416 (1997).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!