achieved <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g case scenario:Tom has died recently, survived by the three children <strong>of</strong> his first marriage <strong>and</strong> his secondwife. Tom had married his second wife (who is the same age as his oldest child) thirteenmonths prior to his death. Six months prior to his death, he transferred $500,000 to hiswife. There is some question as to whether this was a gift or a loan. Two weeks before hedied, while <strong>in</strong> the hospital, Tom changed his will (which had formerly divided his estateamong his children). In his new will, he bequeathed to his second wife a collection <strong>of</strong>f<strong>in</strong>e antique watches that had been collected by him <strong>and</strong> his first wife dur<strong>in</strong>g their marriage.The will directed that 2/3 <strong>of</strong> the residue <strong>of</strong> his estate be placed <strong>in</strong> a trust from whichhis second wife was entitled to the <strong>in</strong>come every year. The trustee also was given the discretionto use any <strong>of</strong> the trust property necessary for the health or ma<strong>in</strong>tenance needs <strong>of</strong>Tom's wife or children, with the rema<strong>in</strong>der to be paid to Tom's children. Tom's will directedthat the rest <strong>of</strong> his estate was to be divided equally among his three children. Each<strong>of</strong> his children has liv<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>or children. One <strong>of</strong> Tom's gr<strong>and</strong>children has severe healthproblems.In this case, one <strong>of</strong> Tom's children has a son with chronic healthproblems for which Tom may have promised f<strong>in</strong>ancial assistance. This childexpected to receive a bequest potentially greater than that <strong>of</strong> his sibl<strong>in</strong>gs. Another<strong>of</strong> Tom's children helped amass the collection <strong>of</strong> antique watches <strong>and</strong>expected that they would be passed down to her. 4 The "legal" alternative isto declare Tom's will <strong>in</strong>valid <strong>and</strong> have the property distributed through thelaws <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>testate succession. This alternative may not resolve the fairness issue,may underm<strong>in</strong>e the testator's wishes, <strong>and</strong> will probably exacerbate anyalready-exist<strong>in</strong>g family strife. <strong>Mediation</strong>, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, is not limited tothis resolution. Through mediation, the parties can divide the property toreach a more "fair" outcome. 35 For example, they could agree to a cash paymentto the second wife, a distribution <strong>of</strong> the watches to one child, <strong>and</strong> theestablishment <strong>of</strong> a trust fund to cover the medical costs <strong>of</strong> the gr<strong>and</strong>child,with the rema<strong>in</strong>der divided accord<strong>in</strong>gly among Tom's issue.34. "Significant attachment to isolated items <strong>of</strong> personal property <strong>of</strong>ten represents the genesis<strong>of</strong> probate disputes." Hewitt, supra note 13, at 43.35. Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Stulberg argues that "the mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> fairness is not exhausted by the concept<strong>of</strong> 'legal justice'." Joseph B. Stulberg, Fairness <strong>and</strong> <strong>Mediation</strong>, 13 Oto ST. J. ON Disp.REsOL 909, 910 (1998). He argues mediation statutes should be designed to promote outcomesthat are "fair" rather than comport with a preconceived notion <strong>of</strong> which rights or outcomesshould be secured-for example, he criticizes a family law mediation statute <strong>in</strong>tended to promote"close <strong>and</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g contact with both parents after the marriage is dissolved" because it ignoresthe possibility that such an outcome may not be the most fair <strong>in</strong> every circumstance, Id. at919. Similarly, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Gary expla<strong>in</strong>s that commonly held beliefs about how property should bedistributed (e.g., <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>of</strong> equal relationship to the decedent should receive equal shares)may ignore circumstantial factors, such as the sentimental value <strong>of</strong> items <strong>of</strong> property or greateremotional ties among some family members. See Gary, supra note 5, at 417.
[Vol. 1: 241, 2001]PEPPERDINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION LAW JOURNALBecause mediation is not strictly limited to relevant matters, the processmay also result <strong>in</strong> the resolution <strong>of</strong> issues that could cause unnecessary litigation<strong>in</strong> the future. For example, us<strong>in</strong>g the example above, if Tom's childrenare unsuccessful <strong>in</strong> caveat<strong>in</strong>g his will, they may later claim that his secondwife entered <strong>in</strong>to a contract with Tom that she would leave some or all <strong>of</strong>"his" property to his children <strong>in</strong> her own will. This issue can be raised <strong>and</strong>dealt with <strong>in</strong> the mediation, even though not yet ripe for litigation.F EfficiencyReduced cost is <strong>of</strong>ten cited as one <strong>of</strong> the primary advantage <strong>of</strong> mediation.36 Its <strong>in</strong>formal process allows for meet<strong>in</strong>gs to occur more quickly <strong>and</strong> fordecisions to be made, if not <strong>in</strong> the session itself, soon thereafter. This efficiencymay result <strong>in</strong> decreased legal fees. 7 Court costs (court reporter, transcript,etc.) are avoided. Mediators may charge for their services,-' but manyprograms provide for m<strong>in</strong>imal fee structures or even voluntary work bymediators.While efficiency <strong>and</strong> low cost are <strong>of</strong>ten touted as benefits <strong>of</strong> mediation,Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Stulberg po<strong>in</strong>ts out that care should be taken lest these benefits become"goals" <strong>and</strong> override the basic fairness <strong>of</strong> the process. 39 He argues thatthe pressure to be efficient may cause a mediator to restrict the parties' participation<strong>in</strong> the mediation session, favor<strong>in</strong>g legal counsel (over the partiesthemselves) due to the attorneys' tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> present<strong>in</strong>g issues <strong>in</strong> a concise36. See id. at 431. However, some controversy exists as to whether mediation <strong>and</strong> otherforms <strong>of</strong> ADR actually end <strong>in</strong> lower costs to the parties. See Roselle L Wissler, The Effects <strong>of</strong>M<strong>and</strong>atory <strong>Mediation</strong>: Empirical Research on the Experience <strong>of</strong> Small Claims <strong>and</strong> CommonPleas Courts, 33 WILtAmTr L REv. 565, 569-70 (1997) (cit<strong>in</strong>g studies that disagree as towhether mediation contributes substantially to the efficiency <strong>of</strong> dispute resolution). See also, DarrylVan Duch, Case Management Reform Ineffective: ADR, Other Reform-Act Fixes Don't SveTune or Money, CIRA Study Says, NAT'L L J., Feb. 3, 1997, at A6. cal. I (discuss<strong>in</strong>g conclusions<strong>of</strong> R<strong>and</strong> Institute for Civil Justice study on reforms m<strong>and</strong>ated by the Civil Justice ReformAct).37. Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Gary states "research <strong>in</strong> family law has shown that mediation costs less thanlitigation <strong>in</strong> resolv<strong>in</strong>g divorce cases." Gary, supra note 5, at 431. She cont<strong>in</strong>ues that many probatecases <strong>in</strong>volve small estates that are substantially depleted by litigation costs. See id.38. These charges may not necessarily be lower than attomeys' fees. For example, one retiredjudge <strong>in</strong> Virg<strong>in</strong>ia charges a flat rate <strong>of</strong> S350 per hour. Dawn Chase, Judge Bob Harris AveragesOne <strong>Mediation</strong> Session Every Day <strong>of</strong> the W1brk IWek, VA. LAw. WxLY., Oct. 5. 1998, at B-1.39. See Stulberg, supra note 35, at 922.