13.07.2015 Views

Vol 7 No 1 - Roger Williams University School of Law

Vol 7 No 1 - Roger Williams University School of Law

Vol 7 No 1 - Roger Williams University School of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(at least) four (imperfect yet useful) overarching theories <strong>of</strong>intellectual property.11Economic/utilitarian theory: intellectual property law isjustified in terms <strong>of</strong> economic efficiency.12Lockean/labor desert: intellectual property rights arenatural rights earned through adding labor to thecommon resource <strong>of</strong> information with the proviso thatenough and as good is left for others.13Personhood: intellectual property is an emanation <strong>of</strong> theperson and the law should facilitate this personalaspect.14Social planning: intellectual property law should bedesigned to culturally enrich democratic society.15Economic RightsArguably, the guiding premise <strong>of</strong> American copyright and(1990) (defining the public domain as the realm unprotected by copyright).11. William Fisher, Theories <strong>of</strong> Intellectual Property, in New Essays in the Legaland Political Theory <strong>of</strong> Property, 169-73 (Stephen R. Munzer ed., 2001); see also AnneFitzgerald, Intellectual Property 7-9 (<strong>Law</strong> Book Co., Sydney 1999); Robert P. Merges etal., Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age 1-21 (2d ed. 2000); JustinHughes, The Philosophy <strong>of</strong> Intellectual Property, 77 Geo. L.J. 287, 288-89 (1988).12. See, e.g., Sony Corp. <strong>of</strong> Am. v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417, 429-32 (1984); Millar v. Taylor, 98 Eng. Rep. 201, 218, 252-53 (K.B. 1769); Adam Smith,Lectures on Jurisprudence 83 (Ronald L. Meek et al. eds., Liberty Classics 1982)(1762); William M. Landes & Richard A. Posner, An Economic Analysis <strong>of</strong> Copyright<strong>Law</strong>, 18 J. Legal Stud. 325 (1989); Neil W. Netanel, Copyright and a Democratic CivilSociety, 106 Yale L.J. 283 (1996).13. See Universal Declaration <strong>of</strong> Human Rights, G.A. Res. 217 A (III), U.N. GAOR3d Sess., pt. 1, at art. 27(2), U.N. Doc. A/RES/217 A (III) (1948) (stating “[e]veryone hasthe right to the protection <strong>of</strong> the moral and material interests resulting from anyscientific, literary or artistic production <strong>of</strong> which he is the author.”); Wendy J. Gordon,A Property Right in Self Expression: Equality and Individualism in the Natural <strong>Law</strong> <strong>of</strong>Intellectual Property, 102 Yale L.J. 1533 (1993).14. See generally Margaret J. Radin, Property and Personhood, 34 Stan. L. Rev.957 (1982) (exploring the relationship between property and personhood).15. See generally Peter Jaszi, Toward a Theory <strong>of</strong> Copyright: The Metamorphoses<strong>of</strong> “Authorship”, 1991 Duke L.J. 455 (1991); The Construction <strong>of</strong> Authorship: TextualAppropriation in <strong>Law</strong> and Literature (Martha Woodmansee & Peter Jaszi eds., 1994)(discussing the relationship between copyright and literary and artistic culture).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!