13.07.2015 Views

Threats and Strategies for Global Biodiversity Conservation

Threats and Strategies for Global Biodiversity Conservation

Threats and Strategies for Global Biodiversity Conservation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Assessment Methods:Scientific Collaboration Leads to Underst<strong>and</strong>ing Fire Ecology, <strong>Threats</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Strategies</strong>The <strong>Global</strong> Fire Partnership (GFP) recognizes the need toassess the state of the world’s fire regimes, craft effectiveconservation strategies, <strong>and</strong> build a global constituency ofpartners to address fire as a conservation issue. In March2004, the GFP gathered a group of fire experts <strong>and</strong> policymakersfrom around the world in Switzerl<strong>and</strong> to discussglobal fire regimes <strong>and</strong> biodiversity conservation. Theresults of that workshop (TNC 2004) represented thefirst coarse-scale assessment of where <strong>and</strong> to what extentfire is beneficial or harmful to conserving biodiversity <strong>and</strong>led to the more recent assessment described here.To better underst<strong>and</strong> the global role of fire in biodiversityconservation, <strong>and</strong> to identify the actions necessary to abatethreats to maintaining <strong>and</strong> restoring fire’s ecological role,the GFP implemented three expert workshops betweenJanuary <strong>and</strong> July 2006, covering four broad biogeographicrealms: Australasia, Indo-Malay, Nearctic <strong>and</strong> Neotropic 2 .Realm-level workshops were designed to establish aconsistent global dataset of the ecological roles of fire <strong>and</strong>threats to maintaining those roles at a coarse resolution,which could then be applied to biodiversity conservationglobally. Workshops also aimed to illuminate linkagesbetween fire, climate change, <strong>and</strong> other human-causedthreats to biodiversity, while also strengthening collaboration<strong>and</strong> partnerships among experts, managers <strong>and</strong> policy-makers.Figure 1: Map of realms/ecoregions assessed in 2004 <strong>and</strong> 2006.Attendees of the Nearctic realm expert workshop review data.© Faith KearnsWorkshops began with preliminary global fire assessmentdata developed by the GFP in 2004 (TNC 2004).These data represented fire regime types, conditions <strong>and</strong>threats across WWF <strong>Global</strong> 200 ecoregions—a subsetof all terrestrial ecoregions worldwide. Between August2005 <strong>and</strong> January 2006, literature review <strong>and</strong> expertsurveys were conducted to fill the majority of gaps in thepreliminary assessment (Figure 1). WWF ecoregions wereused as a foundation <strong>for</strong> the assessment because they areavailable consistently around the world, <strong>and</strong> represent amanageable level of resolution <strong>for</strong> a rapid, expert-drivenglobal assessment. During realm-level workshops in 2006,Assessed in 2004Assessed in 2006Future Assessment Area5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!