Delegated Aerial Ungulate Surveys 2009/2010 Survey Season

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 3.Mountain goat observations within each mountain complex/area in2009.Complex Adult Yearling Kid TotalLivingstone 6 4 1 11Crowsnest 39 6 20 65Divide‐ AB 43 9 17 69Divide‐ BC 31 4 6 41Overall Total 119 23 44 186Table 4.Mountain goat population combined trend counts for all mountaincomplexes/areas in Wildlife Management Unit 402, 2006 & 2009.Number of Mountain GoatsYear Adults Yearling Kid Total2009 119 23 44 1862006 98 9 35 14214
Page 1 and 2: Delegated Aerial Ungulate Surveys20
Page 3 and 4: EXECUTIVE SUMMARYAlberta Conservati
Page 6 and 7: LIST OF FIGURESFigure 1. Location o
Page 8 and 9: Table 18. Comparison of aerial surv
Page 10 and 11: moose (Alces alces), elk (Cervus el
Page 12 and 13: surveys do not necessarily allow th
Page 14 and 15: 3.5 ClassificationBeginning in 2008
Page 17 and 18: 4.1.1 Survey methodsFollowing stand
Page 19 and 20: 4.2 Southern mountain goatsPhoto: S
Page 21: 4.2.1 Survey methodsWe searched mou
Page 25 and 26: 4.3.2 ResultsWe observed a total of
Page 27 and 28: 5.1.1 Study areaThe Hay‐Zama wood
Page 29 and 30: 5.1.2 Survey methodsOn March 19, 20
Page 31 and 32: Table 6.Comparison of aerial survey
Page 33 and 34: ecreational hunters typically do no
Page 35 and 36: 5.2.2 Survey methodsBased on a requ
Page 37 and 38: 5.3 Wildlife Management Unit 445 sh
Page 39 and 40: sheep classifications were unclassi
Page 41 and 42: 5.3.3 ResultsA total of 177 bighorn
Page 43 and 44: WMU 119 is agriculture with approxi
Page 45 and 46: target levels. We did not correct f
Page 47 and 48: that an inventory system would be n
Page 49 and 50: 6.2.2 Survey methodsThe survey meth
Page 51 and 52: 4748 represents a 13% increase from
Page 53 and 54: In 2008, hunting of only antlered m
Page 55 and 56: 6.4.2 Survey methodsPrior to the su
Page 57 and 58: should be considered as minimum est
Page 59 and 60: 6.5 Wildlife Management Unit 340 mo
Page 61 and 62: Figure 10.Location of Wildlife Mana
Page 63 and 64: Table 12.Comparison of aerial surve
Page 65 and 66: 6.6.1 Study areaWMU 347 is a relati
Page 67 and 68: 6.6.2 Survey methodsStratification
Page 69 and 70: 6.7 Wildlife Management Unit 351 mo
Page 71 and 72: Figure 12.Location of Wildlife Mana
Page 73 and 74:
A fresh snowfall of 2 ‐ 5 cm on t
Page 75 and 76:
6.8 Wildlife Management Unit 358 mo
Page 77 and 78:
Figure 13.Location of Wildlife Mana
Page 79 and 80:
missing moose. Each flight crew con
Page 81 and 82:
6.9 Wildlife Management Unit 501 mo
Page 83 and 84:
6.9.2 Survey methodsWMU 501 was str
Page 85 and 86:
conditions, especially on the last
Page 87 and 88:
Wildlife surveys for moose in the b
Page 89 and 90:
6.10.2 Survey methodsProvincial aer
Page 91 and 92:
of 7 sharp‐tailed grouse, 2 great
Page 93 and 94:
main communities are High Level, Ra
Page 95 and 96:
6.11.2 Survey methodsAll surveys fo
Page 97 and 98:
8.0 LITERATURE CITEDAlberta Sustain
Page 99 and 100:
Lynch, G.M. 1999. Northern moose ma
show all

Delegated Aerial Ungulate Surveys 2009/2010 Survey Season

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?