Delegated Aerial Ungulate Surveys 2009/2010 Survey Season

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 11. Comparison of aerial moose and elk survey results from 2001, 2005and 2010 in Wildlife Management Unit 326.SpeciesYearPopulation EstimateRatio to 100 Females(90% confidence limits) Animals/km 2 Males JuvenilesMooseElk2010 417 (24.1%) 0.40 80 132005 300 (‐‐) 0.29 ‐‐ ‐‐2010 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐2005 200 (‐‐) 0.19 ‐‐ ‐‐2001 327 (15.0%) 0.31 ‐‐ ‐‐50
6.5 Wildlife Management Unit 340 moosePhoto: Shevenell WebbSection Authors: Dave Hobson, Kirby Smith, and Shevenell WebbObtaining accurate moose population estimates is important for ensuring healthymoose populations and hunting opportunities. WMU 340 is surveyed on arotational basis, approximately every three years. WMU 340 was surveyed usingthe modified Gasaway method in 1994, 1996 and 2004 (Gasaway et al. 1986; Lynchand Schumaker 1995; Lynch 1997). Our objective for this year’s aerial survey wasto estimate moose population size, density, condition and composition (i.e., ratioof bulls:cows:calves).6.5.1 Study areaWMU 340 is located south of the Town of Edson and is bounded by Highway 16on the north, the Wolf Lake road and Wolf Creek on the east, the Pembina River51
Page 1 and 2:
Delegated Aerial Ungulate Surveys20
Page 3 and 4:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYAlberta Conservati
Page 6 and 7:
LIST OF FIGURESFigure 1. Location o
Page 8 and 9: Table 18. Comparison of aerial surv
Page 10 and 11: moose (Alces alces), elk (Cervus el
Page 12 and 13: surveys do not necessarily allow th
Page 14 and 15: 3.5 ClassificationBeginning in 2008
Page 17 and 18: 4.1.1 Survey methodsFollowing stand
Page 19 and 20: 4.2 Southern mountain goatsPhoto: S
Page 21 and 22: 4.2.1 Survey methodsWe searched mou
Page 24 and 25: ecorded for each group of goats. Th
Page 26 and 27: 5.0 WINTER RANGE TREND SURVEYS5.1 H
Page 28 and 29: Figure 4.Location of the Hay‐Zama
Page 30 and 31: In general, survey conditions were
Page 32 and 33: 5.2 Wildlife Management Unit 136/14
Page 34 and 35: Figure 5.Location of Wildlife Manag
Page 36 and 37: 5.2.3 ResultsDuring the rotary‐wi
Page 38 and 39: 5.3.1 Study areaAll probable sheep
Page 40 and 41: Figure 6.Location of the Wildlife M
Page 42 and 43: 6.0 RANDOM STRATIFIED BLOCK SURVEYS
Page 44 and 45: 6.1.2 Survey methodsThe study area
Page 46 and 47: 6.2 Wildlife Management Unit 305 mu
Page 48 and 49: Figure 8.Location of Wildlife Manag
Page 50 and 51: The navigator was responsible for a
Page 52 and 53: 6.3 Wildlife Management Unit 326 el
Page 54 and 55: (~34,800 ha) of the WMU. In general
Page 56 and 57: classified. We then randomly select
Page 60 and 61: on the southeast, Highway 40 on the
Page 62 and 63: 6.5.2 Survey methodsWMU 340 was sur
Page 64 and 65: 6.6 Wildlife Management Unit 347 mo
Page 66 and 67: Figure 11.Location of Wildlife Mana
Page 68 and 69: were present to confirm gender. Wol
Page 70 and 71: 6.7.1 Study areaWMU 351 is delimite
Page 72 and 73: 6.7.2 Survey methodsAn aerial ungul
Page 74 and 75: Table 14.Comparison of aerial surve
Page 76 and 77: unit is bordered by highway 49 to t
Page 78 and 79: 6.8.2 Survey methodsWildlife staff
Page 80 and 81: Table 15.Comparison of aerial surve
Page 82 and 83: Cold Lake. Oil and gas extraction a
Page 84 and 85: surveyed from January 9 ‐ 11, 201
Page 86 and 87: 6.10 Wildlife Management Unit 510 m
Page 90 and 91: without antlers and classified acco
Page 92 and 93: 6.11 Wildlife Management Unit 536 m
Page 96 and 97: (Table 1). We did not correct for s
Page 98 and 99: Frair, J.L., E.H. Merrill, and M.S.
Page 100: Saker, K. 2000. WMU 501 Deer / Moos
show all

Delegated Aerial Ungulate Surveys 2009/2010 Survey Season

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?