13.07.2015 Views

Delegated Aerial Ungulate Surveys 2009/2010 Survey Season

Delegated Aerial Ungulate Surveys 2009/2010 Survey Season

Delegated Aerial Ungulate Surveys 2009/2010 Survey Season

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LIST OF TABLESTable 1.Standardized classification system used to determine antler sizeclasses of male ungulates in Alberta. ..........................................................6Table 2. Comparison of pronghorn antelope survey results from 2007 – <strong>2009</strong>..10Table 3.Table 4.Mountain goat observations within each mountain complex/area in<strong>2009</strong>. ...............................................................................................................14Mountain goat population combined trend counts for all mountaincomplexes/areas in Wildlife Management Unit 402, 2006 & <strong>2009</strong>. .......14Table 5. Mountain goat observations within each mountain complex in <strong>2009</strong>..17Table 6.Table 7.Table 8.Table 9.Table 10.Comparison of aerial survey results for bison in the Hay‐Zama areafrom 1994 – <strong>2010</strong>...........................................................................................23<strong>Aerial</strong> mule deer and white‐tailed deer survey results in WildlifeManagement Units 136 and 140.................................................................28Total numbers and age/sex classification of bighorn sheep in WildlifeManagement Unit 445 and adjacent mountain ranges in BritishColumbia during aerial surveys from 1972 ‐ <strong>2009</strong>. .................................33Comparison of aerial mule deer survey results from 2003 and <strong>2010</strong> inWildlife Management Unit 119..................................................................37Comparison of aerial mule deer survey results from 1996, 2000 and<strong>2010</strong> in Wildlife Management Unit 305. ...................................................43Table 11. Comparison of aerial moose and elk survey results from 2001, 2005and <strong>2010</strong> in Wildlife Management Unit 326.............................................50Table 12. Comparison of aerial survey results for moose in WildlifeManagement Unit 340 from 1994 – <strong>2010</strong>...................................................55Table 13. Comparison of aerial survey results for moose in WildlifeManagement Unit 347 from 1994 – <strong>2010</strong>...................................................60Table 14. Comparison of aerial survey results for moose in WildlifeManagement Unit 351 from 1994 – <strong>2010</strong>...................................................66Table 15. Comparison of aerial survey results for moose in WildlifeManagement Unit 358 in 1998 and <strong>2010</strong>. ..................................................72Table 16.Comparison of aerial survey results for moose and white‐tailed deer inWildlife Management Unit 501 in 2000 and <strong>2010</strong>....................................77Table 17. Comparison of aerial survey results for moose in WildlifeManagement Unit 510 in 1996/97, 2001/02 and <strong>2009</strong>/10. ........................83vi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!