13.07.2015 Views

Adamantia : the truth about the South African diamond fields : or, a ...

Adamantia : the truth about the South African diamond fields : or, a ...

Adamantia : the truth about the South African diamond fields : or, a ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

342 A. 8m~'TY POLICY.tions laid down in my despatch of May 18 ,. (quotedat <strong>the</strong> end of Chapter XIII.), he yet, upon receiving<strong>the</strong> Govern<strong>or</strong>'s inf<strong>or</strong>mation that by <strong>the</strong> proclamationsof October 27th, 1M amaezation of tke <strong>diamond</strong> <strong>fields</strong> hadactluJllg ta,i", pltJce tJJitlwut tAat "f<strong>or</strong>mal compliance,"expressed <strong>the</strong> approval of <strong>the</strong> British Government!In a despatch dated "Downing Street, December 8,1871," Earl Kimberley thus stultifies his previous instructionsand conditions :-". . • Considering all <strong>the</strong> circumstance. - stated in your f<strong>or</strong>merdespatches" (which we have seen were wlwll, untnu), "<strong>the</strong>y (HerMajesty's Government) approve <strong>the</strong> step which you have taken,being COJniDoed that you would· not have acted in anticipation ofprovision being f<strong>or</strong>mally made by <strong>the</strong> Cape Parliameut f<strong>or</strong> <strong>the</strong>anneution of Waterboer's territol'1 to <strong>the</strong> Colony, unless you hadfully satisfied yourself that <strong>the</strong>re were imperative reasons againstfur<strong>the</strong>r delay. I have <strong>the</strong>ref<strong>or</strong>e to convey to you Her :Majesty'sgracious approval and oo6fumation of this proclamation." •.•Whatever those" imperative reasons" were, whichEarl Kimberley deemed sufficient to counteract hisown previous and explicit proviso and commands, <strong>the</strong>Cape Parliament (excepting only four members) entirelyfailed to discover <strong>the</strong>m. Theref<strong>or</strong>e Sir H.Barkly's "imperative reasons" were really not~gm<strong>or</strong>e than <strong>the</strong> illegal, unconstitutional, utterly false,and untenable grounds upon which he and his ExecutiveCouncil carried out <strong>the</strong>ir designs by a hostileinvasion of <strong>the</strong> Orange Free State, and <strong>the</strong> f<strong>or</strong>cibleseizure <strong>or</strong> annexation of its <strong>diamond</strong> <strong>fields</strong> !Of course, those hypo<strong>the</strong>tical premises, <strong>the</strong> af<strong>or</strong>esaid" imperative reasons," remain open to question. Hit• rule p. 4S, Blue Book, "Fur<strong>the</strong>r c<strong>or</strong>respondence, respecting <strong>the</strong>atra.ira of <strong>the</strong> Cape of Good Hope."-London. Februa.rl 6th, 1872.Digitized by Goog Ie

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!