13.07.2015 Views

Aristotle's Theory Unity of Science

Aristotle's Theory Unity of Science

Aristotle's Theory Unity of Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

13 Introductionimportant means that employs elements <strong>of</strong> focality and analogy to createa series <strong>of</strong> similar objects. I call this method 'cumulation,' and it will bethe subject <strong>of</strong> the final chapter. l3 It is a special form <strong>of</strong> a series, which isarranged in order <strong>of</strong> priority and posteriority, and is used in <strong>Aristotle's</strong>discussions <strong>of</strong> souls and friendships. It is also important for determiningthe place <strong>of</strong> theology within metaphysics. The prior members <strong>of</strong> the seriesare logically and ontologically contained in the posterior members, as forexample the nutritive soul is contained in the sensitive soul. The lattercannot exist without the former, and the latter contains the former in itsdefinition potentially. Members <strong>of</strong> cumulative series do not form standardgenera, but they all share some essential attributes with one another, asanalogues do; they are also per se related among themselves, since thedefinition <strong>of</strong> a later member contains the definition <strong>of</strong> a prior member, justas focally related objects do. In spite <strong>of</strong> the features <strong>of</strong> cumulation that arecommon with foeality, cumulative objects cannot form a focal genus. Thereasons for this will emerge in my interpretation <strong>of</strong> the soul series. Thechapter will be filled out with an examination <strong>of</strong> <strong>Aristotle's</strong> two discussions<strong>of</strong> friendship and an argument that he abandoned the focal analysis <strong>of</strong>friendship he provided in the Eudemian Ethics for a cumulative view inthe Nicomachean Ethics because <strong>of</strong> the intractible difficulties in applyingfocality in this context. Finally, I shall use the lesson <strong>of</strong> cumulation andfocality to shed light on the problem <strong>of</strong> the place <strong>of</strong> theology in the science<strong>of</strong> Being.Together, analogy, focality, and cumulation provide Aristotle with themeans to balance the claims <strong>of</strong> the universal science advocated by theAcademy and the isolation <strong>of</strong> the subject-genera, which arises within thelogic <strong>of</strong> his own theory <strong>of</strong> science. This solution, by preserving the autonomy<strong>of</strong> sciences without creating a chaotic heap <strong>of</strong> subject matters, allowseach subject to be treated separately while still maintaining its place in theintelligible architecture <strong>of</strong> the world.13 Grice 1988, 190--2, has called this 'recursive unification.'

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!