182 THE 71F ADVANTAGETable 8–1. M<strong>in</strong>i-markers Factor Analysis: 40 Item Factor Load<strong>in</strong>gs forFive-factor Solution (N = 289)Component*1 2 3 4 5Talkative .747 .208 .176 .024 .131Extroverted .841 .138 .074 -.067 .077Bold .540 -.167 -.018 -.006 .275Energetic .452 .172 -.128 -.197 .243Shy -.797 -.059 .131 .059 -.047Quiet -.838 .015 -.003 -.042 .016Bashful -.766 -.010 .101 .135 -.062Withdrawn -.676 -.295 .178 .146 .063Sympathetic .019 .761 .055 -.072 .133Warm .272 .684 -.078 -.116 .055K<strong>in</strong>d .117 .735 -.044 -.139 .118Cooperative .030 .579 -.005 -.139 .038Cold -.185 -.691 .069 .097 .017Unsympathetic -.018 -.727 .073 .093 -.154Rude .039 -.564 .448 .140 .119Harsh .144 -.482 .470 -.021 .008Organized .108 .084 .012 -.789 -.095Efficient .126 .060 -.026 -.645 .158Systematic .051 .028 .027 -.602 .131Practical -.010 .152 -.063 -.454 .075Disorganized -.011 -.052 .021 .751 .084Sloppy -.064 -.099 .094 .656 .082Inefficient -.110 -.089 .119 .746 -.065Careless .092 -.183 .215 .502 -.127Unenvious .094 -.102 -.531 -.041 .122Relaxed .011 .200 -.441 .244 .008Moody -.138 -.144 .657 .098 .126Jealous -.094 -.096 .728 .103 -.071Temperamental .093 -.130 .713 .099 .117Envious .020 -.044 .714 .065 -.189Touchy .097 .018 .592 .134 .095
UNDERSTANDING AND MEASURING CREATIVE THINKING IN LEADERS 183Fretful -.198 .051 .621 .037 -.068<strong>Creative</strong> .248 .208 -.093 .096 .731Imag<strong>in</strong>ative .228 .235 -.075 .074 .724Philosophical -.075 .073 .046 .042 .646Intellectual .099 -.080 -.041 -.300 .589Complex -.029 -.147 .138 -.025 .615Deep -.042 .065 .082 -.065 .686Uncreative -.256 -.193 .172 .002 -.679Un<strong>in</strong>tellectual -.133 -.035 .129 .273 -.550*Rotated Component Matrix (Varimax Rotation with Kaiser Normalization)International Personality Item Pool. The second <strong>in</strong>strument exam<strong>in</strong>ed<strong>in</strong> this study is based on items drawn from the International PersonalityItem Pool (IPIP). Goldberg <strong>and</strong> colleagues (1999; Goldberg, Johnson,Eber, Hogan, Ashton, Clon<strong>in</strong>ger, <strong>and</strong> Gough, 2006) constructedthe IPIP <strong>in</strong> 1996 as a free <strong>and</strong> open source, onl<strong>in</strong>e repository of personalitymeasurement items collected from multiple public-doma<strong>in</strong>sources. Their goal was to accelerate advancement <strong>in</strong> the field of personalityresearch by alleviat<strong>in</strong>g copyright <strong>and</strong> other restrictions relatedto commercial test publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong>, thereby, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the prospect forcollaborative research networks, data-shar<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> study replication.They have s<strong>in</strong>ce referred to their project as a “collaboratory,” def<strong>in</strong>ed as“a computer-supported system that allows scientists to work with eachother, facilities, <strong>and</strong> data bases without regard to geographical location”(F<strong>in</strong>holt <strong>and</strong> Olson, 1997). The IPIP currently has over 2,000 items onits Web site, which is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed by the Oregon Research Institute.Johnson’s short form IPIP-based representation of the NEO–PI–R. TheNEO–PI–R (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness Personality Inventory–Revised;Costa <strong>and</strong> McCrae, 1992), a licensed commercial product,is perhaps the most widely recognized <strong>and</strong> accepted st<strong>and</strong>ardizedtool for measur<strong>in</strong>g the five-factor doma<strong>in</strong>s <strong>and</strong> the facets that are hypothesizedto underlie them (see Johnson, 2000a). The NEO–PI–R itselfconta<strong>in</strong>s 240 items represent<strong>in</strong>g 30 facets, or 6 facets for each ofthe overarch<strong>in</strong>g 5 factor doma<strong>in</strong>s: neuroticism, extraversion, openness,agreeableness, <strong>and</strong> conscientiousness (sometimes rearranged toform the acronym OCEAN). The “middle-level” personality categoriesreflected by the 30 facets of the NEO–PI–R are perhaps the most