13.07.2015 Views

The Need for an Alphabetically Arranged General Usage Dictionary ...

The Need for an Alphabetically Arranged General Usage Dictionary ...

The Need for an Alphabetically Arranged General Usage Dictionary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Sitlo-Plarouic Pnper.~, 1 (February, 1986)Since both of these projects will likely be consuming large amountsof PRC <strong>an</strong>d US government funding, it is in the interests of allconcerned to see that these dictionaries havc some me<strong>an</strong>s of alphabetizedaccess.In light of the recent appear<strong>an</strong>ce of the massive Bol'shoi Kir~risko-Klrsskii Slol~crl-' , compiled under the chief editorship of I. M. Osh<strong>an</strong>in.I would seriously recomn~end that ef<strong>for</strong>ts toward the creationof a large ncw Chinese-English dictionary be coordinated. It wouldbe niuch preferable if funding agencies were to make all of thcirgr<strong>an</strong>ts to a joint comtnission <strong>for</strong> the preparation of a quality, thoroughproduct ruther th<strong>an</strong> frittering away several hundred thous<strong>an</strong>d dollarsthrough sponsoring two or three medium-sized, mediocre dictionaries.We already have more th<strong>an</strong> enough of these costly artifactsof incompetence clogging the shelves of our libraries. Whether fromgovernment agencies or private institutions, funds <strong>for</strong> the compilationof a new dictionary should be firmly withheld until thc org<strong>an</strong>izersof the project c<strong>an</strong> demonstrate that their work will exceed in scope<strong>an</strong>d excellence all existing Chinese-English lexicons. It would be ashame, indeed a pathetic travesty, if all that $200,000 could buywould be two additional dictionaries like Mathews', <strong>The</strong> PirryirlDirtion~ry Lin Yilt<strong>an</strong>g 's, or Li<strong>an</strong>g Shih-ch'iu's. Even one Inore suchdictionary - considering the fact that we are already blessed withsuch a plethora - would be a worthless excrescence. Two morewould be sirnply too IIIUC~, like bringing owls to Athens. <strong>The</strong>re arenumerous desiderata <strong>for</strong> a good dictionary of Chinese. Since EllingEide (1975; sce also David Jord<strong>an</strong>. 1981) has already stated themso eloquently <strong>an</strong>d <strong>for</strong>cefully, there is no need <strong>for</strong> me to repeat themhere. I will mention only that a good m<strong>an</strong>y of them havc been metin the impressive Russi<strong>an</strong> dictionary mentioned at the beginning ofthis paragraph.<strong>The</strong> Bol'shoi Kitaisko-Rzrsskii Slol?nrP might almost serve as amodel of completeness <strong>for</strong> a dictionary of modern Chinese. In thefirst place, it is huge, containing around 250.000 words <strong>an</strong>d expressionslisted under 15,681 characters. <strong>The</strong> entire first volume, out offour, is dedicated to making the life of the user as easy as possible(traditional Chinese lexicographers seem to have delighted in putting

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!