13.07.2015 Views

ed 366 967 aut7or title institution report no pub date note ... - ERIC

ed 366 967 aut7or title institution report no pub date note ... - ERIC

ed 366 967 aut7or title institution report no pub date note ... - ERIC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12 Reconsidering the WorkshopJune 21, 1991Dear Jan,I lik<strong>ed</strong> your letter of the 13th a lot. I lik<strong>ed</strong> the Steinian rhythms thatpunctuat<strong>ed</strong> some of your observations about the old benign workshops.I lik<strong>ed</strong> the way your discussion of that <strong>no</strong>w impossible old model comesaround at the end to the question <strong>no</strong>t only of textual auto<strong>no</strong>my butalso of the auto<strong>no</strong>my of the creative writing workshopas a practice,I'm going to addin the context of our graduate program (and ofprograms in other places).Well, I'm guessing you'll agree that the workshop can't claim auto<strong>no</strong>myany more than texts can. Workshops are, in a way, texts, discourses,and as such are invad<strong>ed</strong> on every border by ideologies, reading practices,goings-on in the department, in the discipline, in the profession, etc.The question is one of usefulness and intellectual energy, <strong>no</strong>t auto<strong>no</strong>mySo, just for the heck of it, I'm going to take two opposite positions,leaving myself open to charges of dichotomous thinking, rhetoricaldisinge<strong>no</strong>usness. etc., etc. (One can't say anything <strong>no</strong>wadays withoutstumbling across a thousand poststructuralist taboospolarity, hierarchylogocentrism. phallocentricism, any kind of center, essentialism,foundationalism, HUMANISM, etc.)Position #1 (Prone) Workshops Are the Worst Place to EncourageResponsible Talk About Writing and Ought to Be Banish<strong>ed</strong>. They hav<strong>ed</strong>evelop<strong>ed</strong> <strong>no</strong> <strong>pub</strong>licly examinable practice or discourse, statementsabout themselves (in ANT Bulletins, Teachers Collaborative, etc.) constitutethe most lugubrious species of touchy-feelies, guru-ism, magicintuitions, etc. (although they are covertly vulnerable to every fad in themarkets, whether lit mag or NYC <strong>pub</strong>lishing). At the same time theyare critical troglodytes, hanging on tenaciously, as you suggest<strong>ed</strong>, to thetenets of a long-dead formalism. Their marginalization is self-inflict<strong>ed</strong>,a misguid<strong>ed</strong> insistence on isolating themselves from the evil influencesof the academy of which they are a part, on claiming for MFA studiodegrees <strong>ed</strong>ucation sufficient for college teaching. Maybe all this comesfrom the Romantic mystique about the inviolable soul of the artistasdangerous a hyperbole in its own way as the disappear<strong>ed</strong> author inFoucault, Barflies, Machery et al. Anyway workshops create a companyof k<strong>no</strong>w-<strong>no</strong>thing navel-gazing isolates. Put them in the third book ofGulliver's Travels with instructions to the flappers never to awakenthem again.Position #2 (Supine) Workshops Are the Best Place to EncourageSerious Talk About Writing and Must Bc Kept as an Integral Part ofAny Good Grad Program. Iiiwkshops save us from the inadequaciest.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!