13.07.2015 Views

Minutes - University of Canterbury

Minutes - University of Canterbury

Minutes - University of Canterbury

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COUNCIL09/2013 1<strong>Minutes</strong>Date Wednesday 25 September 2013TimeVenuePresentApologiesIn AttendanceCONFLICTS OFINTERESTMINUTESMATTERS ARISING3.00pmOkeover Room, Okeover HouseDr John Wood (Chancellor), Ms Sue McCormack (Pro-Chancellor),Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Ian Town (Acting Vice-Chancellor), Ms Jo Appleyard, MrPeter Ballantyne, Judge Colin Doherty, Ms Catherine Drayton, MrBruce Gemmell, Mr Tony Hall, Mr David Ivory, Ms Erin Jackson,Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Simon Kemp, Mr Warren Poh, Dr Andy Pratt, Mr MichaelShurety, Dr Duncan Webb.Dr Rod Carr (Vice-Chancellor).Mr Jeff Field (<strong>University</strong> Registrar, Secretary to the Council)Mr Bruce White (Deputy Registrar)Mr Keith Longden (Chief Financial Officer)Ms Alex Hanlon (Director, Learning Resources)Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Steve Weaver (Assistant Vice-Chancellor, Research)No conflicts <strong>of</strong> interest were declared.The minutes <strong>of</strong> the meeting <strong>of</strong> Wednesday 28 August 2013 wereapproved and signed as a correct record.UC Council ConstitutionFormer Chancellor Dr Robin Mann and Mr Don McBeath <strong>of</strong> MDS Lawjoined the meeting. Dr Mann said he would take the paper as read, asCouncil members were well aware <strong>of</strong> the extent <strong>of</strong> consultation andworkshop development process which had led to the recommendation toadopt the amended Constitution, comprising twelve members within theexisting Act. Dr Wood raised two issues:• whether the incumbent members, whose positions were to bedisestablished, should be grand-parented until the end <strong>of</strong> theirterm, and• whether there should be a recommendation to the Minister thatpayments to members should remain at the same collective total,but be divided between the smaller number <strong>of</strong> members, as therewould remain as much work as there had been for the previouslarger Council.


09/2013 2His own preference in respect <strong>of</strong> grand-parenting was to leave thedecision to the individual as to whether they wished to resign orserve out their term.Discussion <strong>of</strong> the proposed amended constitution included:• Whether there should be a delay in adoption given thepossibility <strong>of</strong> the Minister changing the legislation.• That the consultation process and the rationale <strong>of</strong> Councilremained valid, and that the reduction in size was being donefor sensible reasons and hence should be proceeded with.• That the Minister had encouraged UC to proceed.• That the Minister had told chancellors that his intention was todownsize university councils to between 8 and 12 members andhence an option <strong>of</strong> 12 within the current legislation might meanno need to review the Act.• That other universities were looking to move to a similar,smaller structure, within the existing Act.• Whether a review period should be specified to check whetherthe smaller Council had led to the intended higher performanceoutcomes that were desired.• That a review was a sensible concept that should be consideredin terms <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> the change once the Minister hadgazetted it.MovedThat: Council adopts the amended constitution and refers itto the Minister for Tertiary Education for gazetting inaccordance with the provisions <strong>of</strong> S170 <strong>of</strong> the Education Act1989.CarriedDr Wood then tabled a draft letter to the Minister he proposed to sendthe following day, with the amended Constitution and a request that itbe gazetted by the Minister. Dr Wood said that he would also adviseother Chancellors <strong>of</strong> the change. He also proposed a formal vote <strong>of</strong>thanks to Dr Mann.MovedThat: Council acknowledge the guidance and wisdom <strong>of</strong> DrRobin Mann in leading the <strong>University</strong> through a carefulprocess <strong>of</strong> consideration and consultation in respect <strong>of</strong> therevised Council constitution.CarriedFROM THECHANCELLORDr Wood welcomed the 2014 UCSA President-Elect Sarah Platt, whowas in attendance at the meeting.Chancellor’s MeetingsThe report was noted.2013 Workshop ScheduleThe workshop schedule for 2013 was complete. The 2014 budgetworkshop on 30 October will be held at 3pm with the Council meeting


09/2013 3starting at 4pm. On 27 November, the Council meeting will start at 3pmto allow the Emeritus Pr<strong>of</strong>essors’ function to start at 5pm. TheChancellor invited suggestions for 2014 workshops to be forwarded tothe Registrar.Chancellor’s AbsenceDr Wood was visiting the UK and had delegated to Ms McCormack theduties and responsibilities <strong>of</strong> the Chancellor for the period 26 Septemberto 13 October. Any issues should be raised either with Ms McCormackor the Registrar.FROM THE VICE-CHANCELLORThe written report, prepared by the Vice-Chancellor, covered:• Introduction• Strategic matters• Staff matters• Financial outcome• AppendicesIn addition, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Town emphasised the effort that was going in torecruitment <strong>of</strong> students, with enrolments opening on October 1.Discussion <strong>of</strong> the report included:• The changes in respect to the PBRF; Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Weaver said the2018 round would be similar to 2012 but with a greater emphasison new and emerging researchers, the inclusion <strong>of</strong>commercialisation income in external research income, and thedeletion <strong>of</strong> special circumstances but the maintenance <strong>of</strong>earthquake circumstances.• The issues to do with the cost, scope and timeline <strong>of</strong>implementation <strong>of</strong> the new Student Management System werediscussed; the 3½ week delay was noted and was to be the subject<strong>of</strong> further discussion in the public excluded section <strong>of</strong> the meeting.• The very positive feedback from the I-Grad survey was noted andalso efforts that were being put into addressing some <strong>of</strong> thenegative feedback received in respect <strong>of</strong> food on campus,accommodation, Wi-Fi and the Recreation Centre.• That the increase in fundraising income reflected a greateremphasis and resourcing <strong>of</strong> the area.• Dr Wood also noted the very successful 50 th AnniversaryCelebration <strong>of</strong> the first award <strong>of</strong> Honorary Doctorates at the<strong>University</strong> and the establishment <strong>of</strong> a Scholarship Fund as a result<strong>of</strong> that event.MovedThat: the Vice-Chancellor’s report be received.CarriedFROM THEFINANCE, PLANNINGAND RESOURCESCOMMITTEEDr Wood introduced Ms Drayton as the new Chair <strong>of</strong> the FinancePlanning and Resources Committee following election by members atthe previous meeting. Ms Drayton introduced the items.


09/2013 4Borrowing Approval ProcessMovedThat: the Minister’s letter advising changes to the process <strong>of</strong>obtaining approval to borrow be noted by Council.CarriedCAPEX Quarterly ReportMs Drayton highlighted three issues:• The $14M underspend to date related largely to delays in theRegistry Project. The History and Law Projects were onschedule.• The need for expenditure on the Oracle upgrade, which wasforeshadowed as the next major capital business case, and• The desire <strong>of</strong> the Committee to have better insight into thephilosophy and practice in relation to contingency components<strong>of</strong> capital funds. Ms Hanlon was taking a memo to the Finance,Planning and Resources Committee meeting in October on thatsubject.MovedThat: the CAPEX quarterly report be noted by Council.CarriedInvitation to attend major UC Futures presentationsAt the Monday 21 October meeting <strong>of</strong> the Finance, Planning andResources Committee, two major presentations would be made on theRegional Science and Innovation Centre and the <strong>Canterbury</strong>Engineering the Future Projects. The presentations would last 30minutes each, with time for questions in each case. All members <strong>of</strong> theCouncil were invited to attend what would be a major presentation andan opportunity for all members to have input.Dr Webb joined the meeting.FROM THE ACADEMICBOARDThe Chair <strong>of</strong> the Academic Board, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Ian Town, provided thereport. Members discussed the Academic Freedom Policy which was amatter for approval by the full <strong>University</strong> Council and would beconsidered at the meeting <strong>of</strong> October 30.MovedThat: the Academic Board Report be noted.CarriedPUBLIC EXCLUDEDMEETINGMovedThat: in terms <strong>of</strong> Section 48 <strong>of</strong> the Local Government OfficialInformation and Meetings Act 1987, the public be now excludedfrom this part <strong>of</strong> the meeting because the Council wishes todiscuss –10.1 Apologies10.2 Register <strong>of</strong> Interests


Moved09/2013 510.3 Conflicts <strong>of</strong> InterestEvery Member has an obligation to declare anymaterial interests relevant to any <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Canterbury</strong> activities and to ensure that any conflictarising from the material interests is noted andmanaged appropriately10.4 <strong>Minutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> the meeting held on 28 August 201310.5 Matters Arising10.6 From the Chancellor10.7 From the Vice-Chancellor10.7.1 Risk Update10.8 From the Finance, Planning and ResourcesCommittee10.8.1 Movements in Year End Forecast10.8.2 UC Futures Update10.8.3 UCDC Update10.8.4 Insurance Renewal Update10.9 2013 Innovation Medal10.10 Emeritus Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Appointmentand for the reason that in terms <strong>of</strong> Section 7 <strong>of</strong> the LocalGovernment Official Information and Meetings Act 1987discussion <strong>of</strong> these matters in public would be likely to inhibitthe effective conduct <strong>of</strong> Council business and infringe theprivacy <strong>of</strong> an individual or prejudice the <strong>University</strong>’s carryingout <strong>of</strong> its commercial activities.CarriedThat Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Town, Mr White, Mr Longden, Ms Hanlon andPr<strong>of</strong>essor Weaver be in attendance.CarriedRETURN TOPUBLIC MEETINGMembers returned to public meeting at 4.45pm and confirmeddiscussion <strong>of</strong> items 10.1-10.10.The meeting closed at 4.46pm.The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday 30 October 2013 at 4.00pm.SIGNED AS A CORRECT RECORD:___________________________________DATE:___________________________________

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!