Was the Landskrona Project an Effective Catalyst for Change?

Through Diffusion• The findings of the Landskrona projectcatalyzed other projects in:• Norway, Netherlands, U.K., Denmark,Finland, Austria, Ireland, Poland, CzechRepublic,• Hungary, Italy, Belgium, Portugal,Switzerland, New Zealand, Australia,China, India, Korea, Canada, Mexico &Egypt and in about 45 other countriesThrough Leadership & Diffusion– UNEP’s & UNIDO’s Program for thedevelopment of National SustainableConsumption and Production ProductionCenters in 50 developing countries;Through Leadership & Diffusion– UNEP’s & UNIDO’s Program for thedevelopment of National SustainableConsumption and Production ProductionCenters in 50 developing countries;– Establishment of Sustainable Consumption& Production Roundtables in:Through Educational & Researchefforts in Universities• The International Institute for IndustrialEnvironmental Economics (IIIEE) in LundUniversity was established, due, in large part,to the catalytic roles of the Landskronaproject;The U.S. Europe CanadaThe Asia Australia MexicoPacific‐RegionBrazil AfricaThrough Educational & Researchefforts in Universities• The International Institute for IndustrialEnvironmental Economics (IIIEE) in LundUniversity was established, due, in large part,to the catalytic roles of the Landskronaproject;• Similar educational M.Sc., and Ph.D programsnow exist in about 200 universities, globally,due to the ‘preventative approaches of theLandskrona project and to similar projects.Through Regulations to PromotePreventative Approaches• The U.S., Canada, China, The EU andmany other regions have developedregulations that foster implementationof Cleaner Production & Toxics Usereduction approaches.