04.12.2012 Views

A GP-AHP method for solving group decision-making fuzzy AHP ...

A GP-AHP method for solving group decision-making fuzzy AHP ...

A GP-AHP method for solving group decision-making fuzzy AHP ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1984 C.-S. Yu / Computers & Operations Research 29 (2002) 1969–2001<br />

Fig. 6. A<strong>fuzzy</strong> value log a 2 24.<br />

Take (4.6) as an example. After switching (log a24) and log a24,<br />

log a 1 24 =[ (log a 1 24)+14:60733d 1 24;1 +13:08556d 1 24;2<br />

+10:81401d1 24;3 − 2:90424)]=(−11:94979)<br />

where log a1 24 + d124;1 + d124;2 + d124;3 ¿ 0:17609.<br />

In reality, <strong>fuzzy</strong> ratings obtained from the <strong>decision</strong>-maker(s) may be concave, convex, or<br />

concave–convex mixed membership functions. Since Corollary 2 cannot treat convex membership<br />

functions, the proposition of treating a convex membership function is introduced below.<br />

Consider the following example.<br />

Example 3.<br />

Maximize (log a 2 24)<br />

Subject to a 2 24 ¿ 0;<br />

where log a 2 24<br />

is a convex–concave mixed <strong>fuzzy</strong> value depicted in Fig. 6.<br />

) can be expressed as follows:<br />

(log a2 �<br />

24)=1:99316 log a2 � ��<br />

1<br />

24 − log +<br />

3<br />

0:27839<br />

��<br />

���<br />

log a<br />

2<br />

2 � ��<br />

2 ���<br />

24 − log<br />

3<br />

� ��<br />

2<br />

Referring to Proposition 3, the (log a 2 24<br />

+ log a 2 24 − log<br />

3<br />

+ −3:40732<br />

(|log a<br />

2<br />

2 24 − log 1|

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!