21.07.2015 Views

handbook-tb

handbook-tb

handbook-tb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Neutralizing effects of hybrid mismatch arrangementsExample 5Mismatch in timing payment — Early deduction butlate incomeZ, a resident of Country A, borrows money from Y, a resident ofCountry B. The loan is for a term of three years and the agreementrequires Z to pay interest in one lump sum at the end of thethree-year period. Country A permits Z to deduct the interest fortax purposes as it accrues, for example, one third of the interestin each of the three years. Country B does not tax the interest asincome to Y until it is received in year three.There is a mismatch between Country A and Country B in thetime at which the interest should be recognized for tax purposes.This gives rise to a cross-border tax benefit because most of theinterest is deductible in Country A in tax years before it is includedin income in Country B. Commonly, this timing benefit is notresolved if Country A taxes the interest at source (for example, bywithholding) because withholding is typically only at the pointthe interest is paid, that is to say, when, given these facts, CountryB also taxes.In this example, Country A grants Z a deduction for interestpayments as they accrue over the three-year term of the loanbecause Country A tax law follows financial reporting in this regard.By contrast, Country B requires Y to include the interest in calculatingincome when it is received (cash basis). The example notes thatsource-State taxation of the interest often does not resolve the timingmismatch because that taxation (like taxation in the residence State inthis example) is most often imposed on a cash basis. This case shouldnot be confused with similar examples that focus on other incometax fundamentals but also result in timing benefits across borders, forexample, where two countries do not agree as to ownership of an assetand so simultaneously both grant depreciation deductions for the asset(see example 9 below).Example 6 is a simple illustration of a mismatch between twocountries that recognize a payment, but disagree as to the character ofthe payment for tax purposes.201

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!