<strong>Address<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Armed</strong> <strong>Violence</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>East</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>4. Uganda4.1. IntroductionNorthern Uganda has endured decades of armed violence.The <strong>in</strong>surgency of the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA), thedom<strong>in</strong>ant conflict of the past 20 years, emerged from earlierarmed <strong>in</strong>surgencies that were rooted <strong>in</strong> northern regionalgrievances aga<strong>in</strong>st the national government of PresidentYoweri Museveni. When Museveni’s National ResistanceArmy seized power <strong>in</strong> 1986, it faced armed resistance <strong>in</strong>northern Uganda from the Uganda People’s Democratic Army(UPDA), made up of sympathetic civilians and remnants ofthe army of the previous government. Local support for theUPDA was motivated by resentment aga<strong>in</strong>st a governmentperceived to be dom<strong>in</strong>ated by western and southern Ugandan<strong>in</strong>terests. The LRA “emanated from a rebellion movement”. 1The costs of the armed violence have been extreme. When<strong>in</strong>ternational attention was f<strong>in</strong>ally drawn to the horrors andseem<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>term<strong>in</strong>ability of the LRA <strong>in</strong>surgency, the detailsof the human and social costs became more widely known.The civilian deaths and massive population displacements,the scale of the abductions and damaged psyches of children,and the prolonged fear suffered by a large region over manyyears all contributed to widespread breakdown of families,communities and traditions <strong>in</strong> the regions affected. Anentire generation has grown up outside the <strong>in</strong>fluence of theestablished social activities and norms of the region.A truce has stalled the LRA <strong>in</strong>surgency <strong>in</strong> northern Ugandabut threats and challenges rema<strong>in</strong>. Quite apart from fearsthat the LRA will return are the demand<strong>in</strong>g needs of postconflictreconstruction. The peacebuild<strong>in</strong>g work of WorldVision Uganda (WVU) aims to address the complexitiesof strengthen<strong>in</strong>g and rebuild<strong>in</strong>g families and communitiesthat have been torn apart by war. The work is occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> anenvironment suffer<strong>in</strong>g the legacies of war, not the least be<strong>in</strong>gthe availability and misuse of weapons. WVU’s peacebuild<strong>in</strong>gis tak<strong>in</strong>g place <strong>in</strong> a period without armed conflict, but withongo<strong>in</strong>g armed violence. The peacebuild<strong>in</strong>g experience<strong>in</strong> Uganda is consequently an important example of thechallenge of secur<strong>in</strong>g armed violence reduction after armedconflict ends.1 See S Gordon, C Vandew<strong>in</strong>t & S Lehmeier, Reluctant Hosts: The Impactof the Lord’s Resistance Army on Communities <strong>in</strong> Western Equatoria State,Southern Sudan, World Vision, 2007, pp 19–21, https://www.worldvision.org/resources.nsf/ma<strong>in</strong>/LRA_report_200706.<strong>pdf</strong>/$file/LRA_report_200706.<strong>pdf</strong>?open&lid=LRA_cover&lpos=day:txt:LRA_title34PAUL BETTINGS / World Vision
<strong>Address<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Armed</strong> <strong>Violence</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>East</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>4. Uganda4.2. Apply<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>Armed</strong> <strong>Violence</strong>Lens To UgandaWe will use the armed violence lens discussed <strong>in</strong> theMethodology section to analyse the results of <strong>in</strong>terviews andfocus groups conducted <strong>in</strong> two districts affected by armedviolence <strong>in</strong> Uganda. We beg<strong>in</strong> by summariz<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dividualand community perceptions of security revealed by the<strong>in</strong>terviews. An arbitrary three-year timeframe was used <strong>in</strong> thequestions to determ<strong>in</strong>e people’s perceptions of whether violencewas <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g or decreas<strong>in</strong>g over time.Affected PopulationsField research was conducted <strong>in</strong> Kitgum and Soroti districts,<strong>in</strong> the North and <strong>East</strong> Regions of Uganda respectively. Formany years, both districts have been heavily affected byextreme violence perpetrated by the Lord’s Resistance Army(LRA) and by earlier armed conflict between remnants of thearmy of the Obote government and the army of the currentgovernment under President Museveni. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the LRA<strong>in</strong>surgency, communities were attacked and displaced andfamilies were torn apart by violence and abduction. Virtuallythe entire civilian population of both districts was affected bythe violence. 2In the past three years levels of violence dropped significantly.Both districts have experienced a respite from LRA attacks,although justifiable fears rema<strong>in</strong> of a possible LRA return.Other forms of armed violence have emerged, however, manyof them l<strong>in</strong>ked to the devastation of the earlier <strong>in</strong>surgency.In addition, as discussed below, cattle raids by neighbour<strong>in</strong>gKaramojong youth are a threat to parts of the districts.The touchstone for most of those <strong>in</strong>terviewed <strong>in</strong> Kitgum andSoroti districts was the LRA <strong>in</strong>surgency and its last<strong>in</strong>g impact.For many, the experience of LRA violence was still close andworrisome. LRA activities that took place several years agowere referred to before more recent violent <strong>in</strong>cidents. There wassome variation <strong>in</strong> perceptions of the immediacy of the LRAthreat, however, as suggested by the dates given for the mostrecent LRA attacks. For example, one <strong>in</strong>terviewee stated that2 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to a World Vision Uganda document (Uganda-II-169879/01533,November 2006, p.15), “for the last 20 years the districts of Gulu, Pader andKitgum plus the neighbour<strong>in</strong>g districts of Lira, Apac, Soroti, Katakwi andKaberamaido have been experienc<strong>in</strong>g violent rebellion perpetuated by theLord’s Resistance Army led by Joseph Kony. As a result, over 1.6 million peoplewere made homeless. Eighty per cent of the northern region’s population lives <strong>in</strong>Internally Displaced Peoples’ camps that have squalid and cramped functionalsocial amenities.”the last major attack by the LRA <strong>in</strong> the Kitgum area occurred<strong>in</strong> 2004 when 12 people were killed. Others <strong>in</strong> Kitgum reportedthat the LRA had attacked as recently as 2005 and 2006 to stealgoods and animals. In Soroti district, <strong>in</strong>terviewees reportedmajor <strong>in</strong>cursions by the LRA <strong>in</strong> 2003 and 2004.Many people – especially older community members who hadexperienced earlier phases of <strong>in</strong>surgent activity – were wary ofa possible return by the LRA. Several voiced fears that the Jubapeace talks would break down and the LRA would return toUganda from Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo(DRC). Some even stated that the LRA had spies <strong>in</strong> the area <strong>in</strong>preparation for this return.Local war<strong>in</strong>ess has been fed by a lengthy peace negotiationprocess that appeared to stall even as the <strong>in</strong>terviews were be<strong>in</strong>gconducted <strong>in</strong> September 2008. A planned <strong>in</strong>terview by theresearch team with a Ugandan religious leader was cancelledwhen he was called to participate <strong>in</strong> a Ugandan government–LRA F<strong>in</strong>al Peace Agreement sign<strong>in</strong>g ceremony. As withprevious attempts, the sign<strong>in</strong>g ceremony did not take placewhen LRA leader Joseph Kony did not appear.There were consistent references to two legacies of the LRAand earlier <strong>in</strong>surgency periods that contribute to current armedviolence. The first legacy is the children abducted by the LRAand now returned to their families or communities. Formerabductees and relatives of abductees spoke of the damage doneto abducted girls and boys that was the subject of worldwideoutrage. Girls who were abducted <strong>in</strong> LRA raids were raped andforced to become “wives” of <strong>in</strong>surgents, endure hard labouror become soldiers. To force the boys <strong>in</strong>to the ranks of theLRA, many were exposed to psychological torture and severelytraumatized. 3 Although many children have been assisted tosuccessfully re<strong>in</strong>tegrate follow<strong>in</strong>g their return from “the bush”,other abductees rema<strong>in</strong> an ongo<strong>in</strong>g, unresolved challenge.Some fail to return to school after their release.The touchstone for most of those<strong>in</strong>terviewed <strong>in</strong> Kitgum and Sorotidistricts was the LRA <strong>in</strong>surgency and itslast<strong>in</strong>g impact.3 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to World Vision Uganda <strong>in</strong> Promot<strong>in</strong>g a Culture of Peace withPartners: Peacebuild<strong>in</strong>g Report 2008 (2008, p 13), “the rescued childrenmanifested physical, social, emotional and health complication[s]. Mostof them had broken down due to prolonged suffer<strong>in</strong>g. They cont<strong>in</strong>ued tosuffer loss of self esteem, <strong>in</strong>security, withdrawal, nightmares, delusions andhalluc<strong>in</strong>ations, guilt feel<strong>in</strong>gs, emotional fear, anger and aggressiveness.”35