31.07.2015 Views

A Comparative Analysis of Student Motivation in ... - Anitacrawley.net

A Comparative Analysis of Student Motivation in ... - Anitacrawley.net

A Comparative Analysis of Student Motivation in ... - Anitacrawley.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

422 Rovai, Ponton, Wight<strong>in</strong>g, and BakerTable 3Means and Standard Deviations (<strong>in</strong> Parentheses) for Type Courseand Ethnicity (N = 353)Variable African American Caucasian OtherTraditional classroom students (n = 172)Intr<strong>in</strong>sic motivationIntr<strong>in</strong>sic – To know 21.73 (4.79) 20.65 (5.14) 18.44 (6.67)Intr<strong>in</strong>sic – To accomplish th<strong>in</strong>gs 19.17 (5.85) 18.09(6.56) 19.00 (6.91)Intr<strong>in</strong>sic – To experience stimulation 15.37 (6.49) 13.92 (5.94) 13.44 (7.00)Extr<strong>in</strong>sic motivationExtr<strong>in</strong>sic – Identified regulation 22.92 (4.23) 22.01 (4.79) 20.33 (5.20)Extr<strong>in</strong>sic – Introjected regulation 20.15 (6.47) 18.45 (6.42) 19.56 (5.98)Extr<strong>in</strong>sic – External regulation 22.32 (4.94) 19.43 (6.08) 17.89 (6.33)Amotivation 7.02 (5.24) 4.98 (2.34) 7.56 (5.59)E-learn<strong>in</strong>g students (n = 181)Intr<strong>in</strong>sic motivationIntr<strong>in</strong>sic – To know 22.14 (4.52) 23.53 (4.36) 21.90 (4.28)Intr<strong>in</strong>sic – To accomplish th<strong>in</strong>gs 20.64 (5.06) 22.17 (4.66) 20.30 (5.68)Intr<strong>in</strong>sic – To experience stimulation 17.07 (5.71) 17.32 (5.24) 17.60 (7.41)Extr<strong>in</strong>sic motivationExtr<strong>in</strong>sic – Identified regulation 22.50 (6.12) 23.65 (4.86) 23.00 (4.07)Extr<strong>in</strong>sic – Introjected regulation 19.21 (5.26) 20.13 (6.50) 20.50 (6.34)Extr<strong>in</strong>sic – External regulation 20.21 (6.78) 20.15 (5.81) 20.40 (7.63)Amotivation 7.93 (7.35) 5.65 (4.50) 5.80 (2.22)Note: African American, n = 102; Caucasian, n = 212; other, n = 39. The total <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic and extr<strong>in</strong>sicmotivation scales can each range from a low <strong>of</strong> 12 to a high <strong>of</strong> 84. All rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g scales can eachrange from a low <strong>of</strong> 4 to a high <strong>of</strong> 28.al group among undergraduates, the opposite was true for graduate students.F<strong>in</strong>ally, for the ethnicity x student status <strong>in</strong>teraction effect, significant<strong>in</strong>teractions were observed only for amotivation, F(2, 342) = 7.54, p = .001,η 2 = .04. That is, although African American students scored higher on amotivation<strong>in</strong> undergraduate versus graduate courses, amotivation scores weresimilar for undergraduate and graduate Caucasian students, and amotivationwas higher for graduate students who classified their ethnicity as other thanfor undergraduate students so classified.DISCUSSIONThe present study addressed the follow<strong>in</strong>g research question. Are thepopulation means for higher education student scores on motivation thesame or different based on type course (e-learn<strong>in</strong>g, traditional), student sta-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!