Eliminating Stockpiles of Highly Enriched Uranium - Pugwash ...
Eliminating Stockpiles of Highly Enriched Uranium - Pugwash ...
Eliminating Stockpiles of Highly Enriched Uranium - Pugwash ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
cover less than half <strong>of</strong> the estimated total Russian HEU stocks. Clearly, there may be<br />
room for additional and accelerated reductions.<br />
Secondly, financial incentives – perhaps in the context <strong>of</strong> a broader economic<br />
cooperation with the European Union – may improve the practical progress in Russian<br />
practical nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation activities. Indeed, before the US<br />
in 1993 indicated its willingness to buy and eliminate Russian HEU surplus, no stocks<br />
were identified by Russia as excessive to national security needs. Fresh European<br />
funds may thus not only improve Russian interest in HEU stockpile accountability, it<br />
may actually facilitate the process <strong>of</strong> Russia identifying additional stocks that could<br />
be declared as excess and slated for elimination.<br />
The prospects <strong>of</strong> additional HEU excess declarations<br />
Elimination <strong>of</strong> HEU beyond the already negotiated 500 tons that have been declared<br />
as excess obviously requires some political bargaining. In order to help possible<br />
donors understand the size <strong>of</strong> the problem, Russia needs to declare its stocks <strong>of</strong> HEU<br />
and the material possibly in excess to national security needs. Russian Minatom 8<br />
experts stress that though there are facilities available to accelerate down-blending<br />
beyond the existing and agreed quantity, any additional HEU stock for elimination<br />
should be <strong>of</strong>ficially admitted and announced by the Russian government as “excessive<br />
to military needs”. To reach such a political decision several domestic actors need to<br />
be closely involved in the process, , e.g. the Russian Ministry <strong>of</strong> Defence, the Foreign<br />
Ministry, the Security Council, the Russian Academy <strong>of</strong> Science and the respective<br />
structures inside the President’s Administration.<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> the first Russian HEU excess declaration in<br />
conjunction with the US-Russian HEU deal may, however, provide hope that external<br />
actors may indeed influence such vital Russian decisions, and that there actually is<br />
more HEU available for a coming HEU excess declaration.<br />
8 In the hour <strong>of</strong> finalization <strong>of</strong> this report, the reformation <strong>of</strong> the government <strong>of</strong> the Russian Federation<br />
has changed the position and weight <strong>of</strong> what used to be Minatom. Though the reform process is<br />
expected to go on for some time (Julie Corwin, “Reforming the Russian Bureaucracy: A Progress<br />
Report, RFE/RL, 15 April 2004), its seems clear at this stage that Minatom will no longer be a ministry<br />
with its own minister but a federal agency, the Federal Agency for Atomic Energy, FAAE under the<br />
Ministry <strong>of</strong> Industry and Energy, headed by Minister Viktor Khristenko; Matthew Bouldin, “Russian<br />
Government Restructuring and the Future <strong>of</strong> WMD Threat Reduction Cooperation: A Preliminary<br />
Analysis, RANSAC Policy Update, March 2004.<br />
In the following, the reference to “Minatom” will be kept and not be changed to the new name. This is<br />
in order to avoid obfuscation where some issues are past statements, agreements etc. made in the name<br />
<strong>of</strong> Minatom and where other future assessment etc are related to the FAAE. If both names were to be<br />
used it would create confusion and give the impression that it is two different agents that are<br />
mentioned.<br />
12