Common Core State StandardS for enGLISH LanGUaGe artS & LIteraCy In HIStory/SoCIaL StUdIeS, SCIenCe, and teCHnICaL SUbjeCtSCommon Core State Standards for <strong>English</strong> language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science and technical subjectsKey design ConsiderationsCCr and grade-specific standardsThe CCR standards anchor the document and define general, cross-disciplinaryliteracy expectations that must be met for students to be prepared toenter college and workforce training programs ready to succeed. The K–12grade-specific standards define end-of-year expectations and a cumulativeprogression designed to enable students to meet college and career readinessexpectations no later than the end of high school. The CCR and high school(grades 9–12) standards work in tandem to define the college and careerreadiness line—the former providing broad standards, the latter providingadditional specificity. Hence, both should be considered when developingcollege and career readiness assessments.Students advancing through the grades are expected to meet each year’s gradespecificstandards, retain or further develop skills and understandings masteredin preceding grades, and work steadily toward meeting the more generalexpectations described by the CCR standards.Grade levels for K–8; grade bands for 9–10 and 11–12The Standards use individual grade levels in kindergarten through grade 8 toprovide useful specificity; the Standards use two-year bands in grades 9–12 toallow schools, districts, and states flexibility in high school course design.research and media skills blended into the Standards as a wholeTo be ready for college, workforce training, and life in a technological society,students need the ability to gather, comprehend, evaluate, synthesize, andreport on information and ideas, to conduct original research in order to answerquestions or solve problems, and to analyze and create a high volume andextensive range of print and nonprint texts in media forms old and new. Theneed to conduct research and to produce and consume media is embeddedinto every aspect of today’s curriculum. In like fashion, research and mediaskills and understandings are embedded throughout the Standards rather thantreated in a separate section.Shared responsibility for students’ literacy developmentThe Standards insist that instruction in reading, writing, speaking, listening,and language be a shared responsibility within the school. The K–5 standardsinclude expectations for reading, writing, speaking, listening, and languageapplicable to a range of subjects, including but not limited to ELA. The grades6–12 standards are divided into two sections, one for ELA and the other forhistory/social studies, science, and technical subjects. This division reflects theunique, time-honored place of ELA teachers in developing students’ literacyskills while at the same time recognizing that teachers in other areas must havea role in this development as well.4 | IntrodUCtIona focus on results rather than meansBy emphasizing required achievements, the Standards leave room for teachers,curriculum developers, and states to determine how those goals should bereached and what additional topics should be addressed. Thus, the Standardsdo not mandate such things as a particular writing process or the full range ofmetacognitive strategies that students may need to monitor and direct theirthinking and learning. Teachers are thus free to provide students with whatevertools and knowledge their professional judgment and experience identify asmost helpful for meeting the goals set out in the Standards.an integrated model of literacyAlthough the Standards are divided into Reading, Writing, Speaking andListening, and <strong>Language</strong> strands for conceptual clarity, the processes ofcommunication are closely connected, as reflected throughout this document.For example, Writing standard 9 requires that students be able to writeabout what they read. Likewise, Speaking and Listening standard 4 sets theexpectation that students will share findings from their research.Part of the motivation behind the interdisciplinary approach to literacypromulgated by the Standards is extensive research establishing the needfor college and career ready students to be proficient in reading complexinformational text independently in a variety of content areas. Most of therequired reading in college and workforce training programs is informationalin structure and challenging in content; postsecondary education programstypically provide students with both a higher volume of such reading than isgenerally required in K–12 schools and comparatively little scaffolding.The Standards are not alone in calling for a special emphasis on informationaltext. The 2009 reading framework of the National Assessment of EducationalProgress (NAEP) requires a high and increasing proportion of informational texton its assessment as students advance through the grades.COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS for ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS 30
Common Core State StandardS for enGLISH LanGUaGe artS & LIteraCy In HIStory/SoCIaL StUdIeS, SCIenCe, and teCHnICaL SUbjeCtSCommon Core State Standards for <strong>English</strong> language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science and technical subjectsdistribution of Literary and Informational Passages by Grade inthe 2009 naeP reading frameworkGrade Literary Informational4 50% 50%8 45% 55%12 30% 70%Source: National Assessment Governing Board. (2008). Reading framework for the 2009 National Assessmentof Educational Progress. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.The Standards aim to align instruction with this framework so that many morestudents than at present can meet the requirements of college and careerreadiness. In K–5, the Standards follow NAEP’s lead in balancing the readingof literature with the reading of informational texts, including texts in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. In accord with NAEP’s growingemphasis on informational texts in the higher grades, the Standards demandthat a significant amount of reading of informational texts take place in andoutside the ELA classroom. Fulfilling the Standards for 6–12 ELA requiresmuch greater attention to a specific category of informational text—literarynonfiction—than has been traditional. Because the ELA classroom must focuson literature (stories, drama, and poetry) as well as literary nonfiction, a greatdeal of informational reading in grades 6–12 must take place in other classes ifthe NAEP assessment framework is to be matched instructionally. 1 To measurestudents’ growth toward college and career readiness, assessments aligned withthe Standards should adhere to the distribution of texts across grades cited inthe NAEP framework.NAEP likewise outlines a distribution across the grades of the core purposesand types of student writing. The 2011 NAEP framework, like the Standards,cultivates the development of three mutually reinforcing writing capacities:writing to persuade, to explain, and to convey real or imagined experience.Evidence concerning the demands of college and career readiness gatheredduring development of the Standards concurs with NAEP’s shifting emphases:standards for grades 9–12 describe writing in all three forms, but, consistentwith NAEP, the overwhelming focus of writing throughout high school shouldbe on arguments and informative/explanatory texts. 2distribution of Communicative Purposes by Gradein the 2011 naeP Writing frameworkGrade To Persuade To Explain To Convey Experience4 30% 35% 35%8 35% 35% 30%12 40% 40% 20%Source: National Assessment Governing Board. (2007). Writing framework for the 2011 NationalAssessment of Educational Progress, pre-publication edition. Iowa City, IA: ACT, Inc.It follows that writing assessments aligned with the Standards should adhere tothe distribution of writing purposes across grades outlined by NAEP.focus and coherence in instruction and assessmentWhile the Standards delineate specific expectations in reading, writing,speaking, listening, and language, each standard need not be a separate focusfor instruction and assessment. Often, several standards can be addressed bya single rich task. For example, when editing writing, students address Writingstandard 5 (“Develop and strengthen writing as needed by planning, revising,editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach”) as well as <strong>Language</strong> standards 1–3(which deal with conventions of standard <strong>English</strong> and knowledge of language).When drawing evidence from literary and informational texts per Writingstandard 9, students are also demonstrating their comprehension skill in relationto specific standards in Reading. When discussing something they haveread or written, students are also demonstrating their speaking and listeningskills. The CCR anchor standards themselves provide another source of focusand coherence.The same ten CCR anchor standards for Reading apply to both literary andinformational texts, including texts in history/social studies, science, andtechnical subjects. The ten CCR anchor standards for Writing cover numeroustext types and subject areas. This means that students can develop mutuallyreinforcing skills and exhibit mastery of standards for reading and writing acrossa range of texts and classrooms.5 | IntrodUCtIon1The percentages on the table reflect the sum of student reading, not just reading in ELAsettings. Teachers of senior <strong>English</strong> classes, for example, are not required to devote 70percent of reading to informational texts. Rather, 70 percent of student reading across thegrade should be informational.2As with reading, the percentages in the table reflect the sum of student writing, not justwriting in ELA settings.COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS for ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS 31
- Page 3 and 4: Common Core state standards forEngl
- Page 5: Table of ContentsSection 1: Wiscons
- Page 9 and 10: ForewordOn June 2, 2010, I formally
- Page 11 and 12: Aligning for Student SuccessTo buil
- Page 13 and 14: Guiding Principles for Teaching and
- Page 15 and 16: • Coursework that prepares ELLs f
- Page 17 and 18: ReferencesIndividuals with Disabili
- Page 19: Wisconsin Foundations for Disciplin
- Page 22 and 23: AcknowledgmentsEnglish Language Art
- Page 24 and 25: Students Who are College and Career
- Page 26 and 27: How to use the CCSS Appendix Docume
- Page 28 and 29: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 32 and 33: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 34 and 35: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 36 and 37: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 38 and 39: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 40 and 41: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 42 and 43: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 44 and 45: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 46 and 47: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 48 and 49: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 50 and 51: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 52 and 53: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 54 and 55: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 56 and 57: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 58 and 59: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 60 and 61: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 62 and 63: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 64 and 65: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 66 and 67: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 68 and 69: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 70 and 71: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 72 and 73: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 74 and 75: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 76 and 77: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 78 and 79: Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 80 and 81:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 82 and 83:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 84 and 85:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 86 and 87:
AcknowledgementsDisciplinary Litera
- Page 88 and 89:
The message is that literacy is int
- Page 90 and 91:
What research and resources are ava
- Page 92 and 93:
The study found writing to learn wa
- Page 94 and 95:
References:Altieri, Jennifer (2011)
- Page 97 and 98:
Common Core State Standards for lit
- Page 99 and 100:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 101 and 102:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 103 and 104:
Common Core State Standards for lit
- Page 105 and 106:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 107 and 108:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 109 and 110:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 111 and 112:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 113 and 114:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 115 and 116:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 117 and 118:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 119 and 120:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 121:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 124 and 125:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 126 and 127:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 128 and 129:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 130 and 131:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 132 and 133:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 134 and 135:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 136 and 137:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 138 and 139:
Common Core State StandardS for enG
- Page 140 and 141:
Common Core State Standards for lit
- Page 142 and 143:
3 As also noted in “Key Considera
- Page 144 and 145:
appendix a | 5(4) Knowledge Demands
- Page 146 and 147:
The reader brings to the act of rea
- Page 148 and 149:
appendix a | 9Common Core State Sta
- Page 150 and 151:
appendix a | 23Narrative WritingNar
- Page 152 and 153:
6 Unpublished data collected by Ach
- Page 154 and 155:
appendix a | 27Because, as indicate
- Page 156 and 157:
appendix a | 29The following exampl
- Page 158 and 159:
appendix a | 31*Subsumed by L.7.3a
- Page 160 and 161:
In early times, no one knew how vol
- Page 162 and 163:
appendix a | 35Common Core State St
- Page 164 and 165:
appendix a | 43*Though Vygotsky him
- Page 167 and 168:
Guiding Principlesfor Teaching and
- Page 169 and 170:
InstructionInstruction that is tail
- Page 171 and 172:
Guiding Principle 2:Instruction mus
- Page 173 and 174:
An example of multimodal learning t
- Page 175 and 176:
Guiding Principle 3:Purposeful asse
- Page 177 and 178:
ReferencesAtkins, J. M., Black, P.,
- Page 179 and 180:
analysis that highlighted some of t
- Page 181 and 182:
Guiding Principle 5:Students bring
- Page 183 and 184:
ResourcesA good resource still vali
- Page 185 and 186:
DifferentiationResearch on differen
- Page 187:
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence re