Figure 2The process of project work in a project forum (12-14 weeks)Group Supervision Learning stages Forum Meetings1st meeting Topic definition Intro SeminarPrelim. Research2nd meeting Definition of ‘cardinal question’ SeminarResearch phase: Theories,methodology, analysisWorking papers3rd meetingCardinal question re-definitionResearch phase: methodology,(fieldwork), analysisCardinal question re-definitionMidway Seminar4th meeting<strong>Feedback</strong> on draft chaptersContinued researchSUBMISSION OF REPORT_______________________Oral exam planningOral exam:Defense and DiscussionAt the middle of the diagram are the learning stages: After the topic has been(preliminarily) defined, the group members start on the preliminary research, asdirected by the supervisor during the introductory seminar, collecting relevanttheoretical and methodological books and articles, as well as previous research in thesame or related areas.During the semester, each group will have at least four group meetings with thesupervisor, for which they will have submitted working papers, or draft chapters for theproject report a couple of days in advance, so as to enable the supervisor to deliverscholarly feedback at the meeting. At the first of these meetings, the group memberswill suggest a formulation of the main question facing their problem-oriented researchprocess, the so-called ‘cardinal question’. As the project goes along, the cardinalquestion may be revised in light of new theoretical, methodological, and analyticaldiscoveries, or practical barriers like when it turns out to be impossible to do as manyfocus group interviews as originally planned.BEA—Educating tomorrow’s electronic media professionals 5
The whole project forum will meet twice during the semester for more formalizedcritique session. Before the forum seminars, each group will be paired with anothergroup, who exchange 5-10 pages presenting the core aspects of their project work sofar, including challenges currently facing the group. During the forum seminar thepaired groups will offer mutual criticism of each other’s work and offer suggestions forsolutions. The rest of the groups belonging to the forum will be the active audience,chipping in with comments if appropriate. Naturally, all the forum’s teacher-supervisorswill also be present and offer their comments, thereby enriching the project work stillahead.As already mentioned, the project process ends with an oral examination duringwhich the project group members present, defend and reflect on their work jointly andindividually. On this basis their achievement is individually assessed and graded.Why project work?The reason why project work was originally adopted as the learning method atRoskilde University was the belief that students learn better when driven by personalmotivation. During the early years, coursework played next to no part in the learningprocess. Over the last decade or so, however, we believe that we have achieved a properbalance between student curiosity and traditional academic requirements, althoughthere is no simple one-to-one relation between these two factors and project work andcoursework, respectively.A distinctive advantage of the project work component is that it ensures thecontinuous and inherent innovation of the program, as new inspiration, from scholarlydevelopments as well as from the surrounding society, can be immediately built intothe learning process. Student curiosity constantly brings the analysis of the most recentcommunicative phenomena into the project environment, while experience has shownthat students also cherish the elements that academic tradition has to offer.It is often extremely rewarding to work as a teacher-supervisor collaborating in theproject process, which is a way of being constantly involved in exciting student-drivenresearch activities. It must also be admitted, though, that the project model is moreteacher-intensive than the course-based model. Over the years, fortunately, RoskildeUniversity has been able to attract a collective of teachers who consider the benefitsmore important than the costs.Concluding remarksThe Communication Program at Roskilde University has a long record of internationalcooperation in teaching and research. The basis of such cooperation lies inEurope, not least as a result of the supportive schemes of the European Union in thearea of higher education known as the Erasmus and Socrates programs. Since the mid-1990s we have been building links to a number of universities in <strong>No</strong>rth America, especiallyin the area of student exchanges. At Roskilde, we now offer several study packagesin English for visiting students, accessible on our website www.comm.ruc.dk. Readersof this article who might be interested in discussing such a cooperative relationshipbetween Roskilde University and their own university is welcome to contact the authorat the address above.6<strong>Feedback</strong> <strong>May</strong> <strong>2002</strong> (<strong>Vol</strong>. <strong>43</strong>, <strong>No</strong>. 2)
- Page 1 and 2: Feedback May 2002 (Vol. 43, No. 2)F
- Page 3 and 4: EditReviews . . . . . . . . . . . .
- Page 5 and 6: Examples of student projects:• Pl
- Page 7: These teachers will also offer a nu
- Page 11 and 12: An e-mail from a recent graduate wh
- Page 13 and 14: or grip contributes to the overall
- Page 15 and 16: Because much of the satisfaction in
- Page 17 and 18: RECORDMANAGEMENT: AN MBTI CASE STUD
- Page 19 and 20: $500 savings on his car purchase. E
- Page 21 and 22: is the largest and most comprehensi
- Page 23 and 24: The PR major at Central Michigan Un
- Page 25 and 26: FAST FORWARDTHE CONVERGENCE CURRICU
- Page 27 and 28: how to shoot video for our newspape
- Page 29 and 30: it meant overseeing radio commercia
- Page 31 and 32: RECORDTHE PARTICIPATION OF WOMENIN
- Page 33 and 34: On the programming front, in early
- Page 35 and 36: Of these 553 participants, 438 (79.
- Page 37 and 38: Table 4: Percentage of female membe
- Page 39 and 40: Kennard, W.E. (1998, September 29).
- Page 41 and 42: RECORDSOLVING THE “PRODUCER PROBL
- Page 43 and 44: PAUSETHE LIFE CYCLE OF AN ADMINISTR
- Page 45 and 46: decision to return to full-time tea
- Page 47 and 48: SEARCHBEA Interest Division Chairs
- Page 49 and 50: SEARCH2002-2003 Leadership Listing
- Page 51 and 52: DISTRICT 7 — All two-year schools
- Page 53 and 54: SEARCHBEA 2002-2003 SCHOLARSHIP WIN
- Page 55 and 56: SEARCHBEA STUDENT NEWS AWARDSby Dan
- Page 57 and 58: Table 3Broadcast Education Associat
- Page 59 and 60:
EDITMcLean, Donald F. (2000). Resto
- Page 61 and 62:
EDITBeale, M. E., & Murray, M. D. (
- Page 63 and 64:
EDITGokhale, Anu. Introduction to T
- Page 65:
EDITKeller, Teresa & Hawkins, Steph