20.08.2015 Views

process

K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry.pdf

K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

290 U. Bunke, T. Schick, M. Spitzweck, and A. ThomFor the last statement we consider finite abelian groups as topological groups withthe discrete topology. Note that the homomorphisms G ! F.i/ are surjective for alli 2 I . We call the system F 2 Ab I an inverse system.Lemma 4.35 ([HR63]). The following assertions on a topological abelian group Gare equivalent:1. G is compact and totally disconnected.2. Every neighbourhood U G of the identity contains a compact subgroup Ksuch that G=K is a finite abelian group.3. G is profinite.Lemma 4.36. Let G be a profinite abelian group and n 2 Z. We define the groups K; Qas the kernel and cokernel of the multiplication map by n, i.e. by the exact sequenceThen K and Q are again profinite.0 ! K ! G n ! G ! Q ! 0: (34)Proof. We write G WD lim j 2J G j for an inverse system .G j / j 2J of finite abelian groups.We define the system of finite subgroups .K j / j 2J by the sequences0 ! K j ! G jn! Gj :Since taking kernels commutes with limits the natural projections K ! K j , j 2 Jrepresent K as the limit K Š lim j 2J K j .Since cokernels do not commute with limits we will use a different argument for Q.Since G is compact and the multiplication by n is continuous, nG G is a closedsubgroup. Therefore the group theoretic quotient Q is a topological group in thequotient topology.A quotient of a profinite group is again profinite [HM98], Exercise E.1.13. Here isa solution of this exercise, using the following general structural result about compactabelian groups.Lemma 4.37 ([HR63]). If H is a compact abelian group, then for every open neighbourhood1 2 U H there exists a compact subgroup C U such that H=C ŠT a F for some a 2 N 0 and a finite group F .Since G is compact, its quotient Q is compact, too. This lemma in particularimplies that Q is the limit of the system of these quotients Q=C . In our case, since Gis profinite, it can not have T a as a quotient, i.e given a surjectionG ! Q ! T a Fwe conclude that a D 0. Hence we can write Q as a limit of an inverse system of finitequotients. This implies that Q is profinite.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!