Topics in Cohomology of Groups_Serge Lang.pdf
Topics in Cohomology of Groups_Serge Lang.pdf
Topics in Cohomology of Groups_Serge Lang.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
38<br />
given by the homomorphism Aa/SGA --~ AG'/SG, A, with G' act-<br />
<strong>in</strong>g on A <strong>in</strong> the manner prescribed above, via A.<br />
By the uniqueness theorem, there exists a unique morphism <strong>of</strong><br />
cohomological functor (5-morphism)<br />
A* : HG "-+ HG' o ~x or HG--~HG, o~x,<br />
the second possibility aris<strong>in</strong>g when G and G' are f<strong>in</strong>ite. We shall<br />
now make this map )~* explicit <strong>in</strong> various special cases.<br />
Suppose A is surjective. Then we call A* the lift<strong>in</strong>g morphism,<br />
and we denote it by lif(gG,. In this case, G may be viewed as a factor<br />
group <strong>of</strong> G ~ and the lift<strong>in</strong>g goes from the factor group to the group.<br />
On the other hand, when G ~ is a subgroup <strong>of</strong> G, then A* will be<br />
called the restriction, and will be studied <strong>in</strong> detail below.<br />
Let A E Mod(G) and B E Mod(G'). We may consider A as<br />
a G'-module as above (via the given A). Let v : A --* B be a<br />
G'-morphism. Then we say that the pair (A,v) is a morphism<br />
<strong>of</strong> (G, A) to (G', B). One can def<strong>in</strong>e formally a category whose<br />
objects axe pairs (G, A) for which the morphisms are precisely the<br />
pairs (k, v). Every morphism (k, v) <strong>in</strong>duces a homomorphism<br />
(A,v). : H~(G,A) ~ H~(G',B),<br />
and similarly replac<strong>in</strong>g H by the special H if G and G' are f<strong>in</strong>ite,<br />
by tak<strong>in</strong>g the composite<br />
H"(G,A) x*, Hr(G',A) H~,(,)H~(G, B)"<br />
Of course, we should write more correctly Hr(G ', ~5~(A)), but usu-<br />
ally we delete the explicit reference to r when the reference is<br />
clear from the context.<br />
Proposition 1.1. Let (A,v) be a morphism <strong>of</strong> (G,A) to G',B),<br />
is a morphism <strong>of</strong> (G,A) to (G",C), and one has