22.08.2015 Views

The Program Evaluation Standards in International Settings

The Program Evaluation Standards in International Settings - IOCE

The Program Evaluation Standards in International Settings - IOCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10 Sandy Tautworld and exploit it <strong>in</strong> order to further personal or group <strong>in</strong>terests. Values <strong>in</strong>clude ambition,success, and competence. High Harmony cultures accept the world as it is and try to preserve itrather than to change or to exploit it (Berry et al., 1997, Vol. 3, p. 100).Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty AvoidanceHofstede (1980, p. 110) describes this dimension based on three <strong>in</strong>dicators, “ruleorientation, employment stability and stress level.” In an extension of Hofstede’s research, Bond(1987) found some evidence that underm<strong>in</strong>es the universality of this cultural value (Berry et al.,1997, Vol. 3, p. 99), but at the same time his study replicated Hofstede’s other three dimensions.However, other researchers have cont<strong>in</strong>ued to use the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty avoidance dimension.Other cross-cultural psychological concepts used here to describe differences betweencultures are:Direct vs. Indirect CommunicationGenerally, direct communication predom<strong>in</strong>ates <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividualistic cultures whereascollectivist societies communicate <strong>in</strong>directly (Gudykunst & T<strong>in</strong>g-Toomey, 1988). Selfdisclosure(giv<strong>in</strong>g personal <strong>in</strong>formation to others they don’t know) is associated with directcommunication styles. A crucial variable <strong>in</strong> collectivist cultures is whether communicationoccurs with members of the <strong>in</strong>group or with members of an outgroup; communication will bemore direct (more self-disclosure) among <strong>in</strong>group members compared to communication withoutgroup members. In contrast, there are no differences <strong>in</strong> self-disclosure between <strong>in</strong>group andoutgroup <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividualistic cultures (Gudykunst et al., 1992).High-Context vs. Low-ContextClosely related to the above mentioned communication issue is the dist<strong>in</strong>ction betweenhigh-context and low-context cultures. Members of collectivist cultures emphasize theimportance of context <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g others’ behavior more than people <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>dividualistic cultures. This also makes adapt<strong>in</strong>g to the context an important part of highcontextcommunication patterns prevalent <strong>in</strong> collectivist cultures. In addition, Uncerta<strong>in</strong>tyAvoidance (UA, see above) <strong>in</strong>fluences the degree to which communication follows rules andrituals (high UA means highly ritualistic), especially for outgroup communication/<strong>in</strong>teraction.Lastly, Power Distance (PD) also determ<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>teraction/communication styles; high PD meanslow levels of egalitarian cooperation between people with different amounts of power. S<strong>in</strong>ceoutgroup members are outsiders, they tend to have less power than <strong>in</strong>siders (see Berry et al.,1997, Vol. 3, p. 142).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!