POL 303 Week 5 DQ 2 Right to Bear Arms
Right to Bear Arms. In 2010 the Supreme Court’s novel and controversial interpretation of the 2nd Amendment greatly limited government’s power to restrict gun possession. The case McDonald v. Chicago sparked widespread debate across the political and legal community, some of which is expressed in the articles you read for this discussion. Read the summary of McDonaldv.Chicago, then choose and read two articles pertaining to the McDonald v Chicago case from the Recommended Resources for POL303 PDF file located in your online classroom. Write a detailed critique of these articles. Respond to this 3-part question in your initial post: a. Explain the articles’ positions and arguments. b. Identify and analyze a strength and a weakness in the authors’ analyses or conclusions (from your perspective). Explain your reasons for viewing each point as either a strength or a weakness. c. Describe how the articles affect your evaluation of the Court’s decision in McDonald v. Chicago and explain why.
Right to Bear Arms. In 2010 the Supreme Court’s novel and controversial interpretation of the 2nd Amendment greatly limited government’s power to restrict gun possession. The case McDonald v. Chicago sparked widespread debate across the political and legal community, some of which is expressed in the articles you read for this discussion. Read the summary of McDonaldv.Chicago, then choose and read two articles pertaining to the McDonald v Chicago case from the Recommended Resources for POL303 PDF file located in your online classroom.
Write a detailed critique of these articles. Respond to this 3-part question in your initial post:
a. Explain the articles’ positions and arguments.
b. Identify and analyze a strength and a weakness in the authors’ analyses or conclusions (from your perspective). Explain your reasons for viewing each point as either a strength or a weakness.
c. Describe how the articles affect your evaluation of the Court’s decision in McDonald v. Chicago and explain why.
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>POL</strong> <strong>303</strong> <strong>Week</strong> 5 <strong>DQ</strong> 2 <strong>Right</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Bear</strong> <strong>Arms</strong><br />
To Purchase This Material Click below Link<br />
http://www.snaptu<strong>to</strong>rial.com/<strong>POL</strong>-<strong>303</strong>/pol-<strong>303</strong>-week-5-dq-2-right-<strong>to</strong>-bear-arms<br />
For more classes visit<br />
www.snaptu<strong>to</strong>rial.com<br />
<strong>Right</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Bear</strong> <strong>Arms</strong>. In 2010 the Supreme Court’s novel and controversial interpretation of<br />
the 2nd Amendment greatly limited government’s power <strong>to</strong> restrict gun possession. The case<br />
McDonald v. Chicago sparked widespread debate across the political and legal community,<br />
some of which is expressed in the articles you read for this discussion. Read the summary of<br />
McDonaldv.Chicago, then choose and read two articles pertaining <strong>to</strong> the McDonald v<br />
Chicago case from the Recommended Resources for <strong>POL</strong><strong>303</strong> PDF file located in your online<br />
classroom.<br />
Write a detailed critique of these articles. Respond <strong>to</strong> this 3-part question in your initial post:<br />
a. Explain the articles’ positions and arguments.b. Identify and analyze a strength and a<br />
weakness in the authors’ analyses or conclusions (from your perspective). Explain your
easons for viewing each point as either a strength or a weakness.c. Describe how the<br />
articles affect your evaluation of the Court’s decision in McDonald v. Chicago and explain<br />
why.
Change language