29.08.2015 Views

Probability Applications

Jane M. Booker - Boente

Jane M. Booker - Boente

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Timothy J. Ross, Kimberly F. Sellers, and Jane M. Booker 99<br />

PowerSet(X) = {0, a, b, c, (a U b), (a U c), (b U c), (a U b U c)}. Figure 5.3 illustrates this<br />

idea. In the figure, the universe of discourse is comprised of a collection of sets and subsets,<br />

or the power set. In a fuzzy measure, what we are trying to describe is the ambiguity in<br />

assigning this point x to any of the crisp sets on the power set. This is not a random notion;<br />

it is a case of ambiguity. The crisp subsets that make up the power set have no uncertainty<br />

about their boundaries as fuzzy sets do. The uncertainty in the case of a fuzzy measure<br />

lies in the ambiguity in making the assignment. This uncertainty is usually associated with<br />

evidence to establish an assignment. The evidence can be completely lacking — the case<br />

of total ignorance — or can be complete and specific —the case of a probability assignment.<br />

Hence the difference between a fuzzy measure and a fuzzy set on a universe of elements is<br />

that in the former the ambiguity is in the assignment of an element to one or more crisp sets,<br />

and in the latter the vagueness is in the prescription of the boundaries of a set. We see a<br />

distinct difference between the two kinds of uncertainty, ambiguity and vagueness. Hence<br />

what follows is a mathematical description of a theory very useful in addressing ambiguity —<br />

possibility theory. This section is given for completeness in describing mathematical models<br />

useful in addressing various forms of uncertainty and not as a matter of extending the scope<br />

of this book beyond a comparison of the utilities of fuzzy set theory and probability theory.<br />

Figure 5.3. The power set of a universe X.<br />

To continue, a set function v(A) e [0, 1] for A c X is a fuzzy measure if A c B -><br />

v(A) < v(B). A triangular norm is a conjunctive operator n : [0, I] 2 —»• [0, 1], which is<br />

associative, commutative, and monotonic, with identity 1. Typical examples are the multiplication<br />

(jc * y) and minimum (min(;t, y)) operators. Their dual conorms are disjunctive, have<br />

identity 0, and include bounded sum min(;c + _y, 1) and maximum max(;t, y). Norms and<br />

conorms are used to operate on fuzzy measures in various ways. They also represent the different<br />

degrees of dependence or independence among events in a probability space and thus<br />

all possible relations among marginal and joint probability distributions (Schweizer (1991)).<br />

A probability measure P is a fuzzy measure, where P(A U B) = P(A) + P(B) —<br />

P(A n B}. The other major class of fuzzy measures consists of possibility measures ]~],<br />

where f](A U B) = max(f](^), [~I(^))- Where a probability measure is characterized<br />

by its probability distribution p(x) = P({x}) for jc e X such that P(A) = ^X&A p(x),<br />

a possibility measure is characterized by its possibility distribution n(x) = Y[((x}) sucn<br />

that H(^) — rnax x€/4 TT(JC). Also, while both probability and possibility measures are<br />

generally normal, with P(X) — Y\(X) — 1, for a probability measure, this entails additivity

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!