29.08.2015 Views

Probability Applications

Jane M. Booker - Boente

Jane M. Booker - Boente

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

368 Chapter 15. Signal Validation Using Bayesian Belief Networks and Fuzzy Logic<br />

influence of the parent node on the child node. Associated with each child node is a probability<br />

distribution conditional on its parents. The nodes with no parents are called "root nodes"<br />

and each has an a priori probability distribution.<br />

At any instant, a certain body of external information is made available to the network.<br />

This "evidence" is incorporated by instantiating the corresponding nodes. The directed<br />

structure of the network and the conditional probabilities associated with each link store<br />

a body of prior knowledge. This allows for the calculation of probability distributions of<br />

the uninstantiated nodes in the network, given the evidence. This represents the conclusion<br />

inferred by the network in light of the evidence presented and is called "inference." The<br />

process of message passing that results in the inference is called "propagation" of evidence.<br />

The inference scheme uses the Bayesian method to calculate updated "beliefs," i.e.,<br />

the probabilities. A typical inference process consists of one initialization step, a series of<br />

updating probabilities, and exchanging n and A messages among nodes. A ^.-message, which<br />

is sent by a child node to its parent, represents the diagnostic information. A TT-message from<br />

a parent node to a child node represents the causal influence. Once the network stabilizes,<br />

the updated probabilities associated with each node represent the belief about the state of the<br />

node in light of the evidence.<br />

Consider a simple system that consists of a temperature sensor/indicator (Figure 15.1).<br />

If the sensor is operational, then there is a correlation between its value and that of the<br />

temperature. The lack of correlation in a faulty sensor is represented as a uniform probability<br />

distribution in the conditional probability table of the indicator node; i.e., both high and low<br />

are equally probable values for sensor reading, irrespective of the high or low value of the<br />

temperature. When the temperature is above a certain threshold (high), the indicator is red;<br />

otherwise it is blue. The network representation of this system uses three discrete-valued<br />

nodes: one for the indicator reading (node /), one for the status of the sensor (node S),<br />

and another (node T) for temperature, whose actual value is unknown at any given time.<br />

The causal relationships and dependencies between the nodes are shown in Figure 15.1.<br />

Node / has two possible values of "red" and "blue." Node S can be either "functional" or<br />

"inoperative" representing the corresponding status of the sensor. Node T represents the<br />

actual temperature that can be "high" if it is above the threshold or "low" otherwise. The<br />

actual states of nodes S and T are not known at any given time. The network helps to form<br />

a probabilistic inference about these states based on the indicator reading.<br />

Based on the manufacturer's specifications, let the a priori probability of the functional<br />

state of node 5 be 0.65. Since each node is binary-valued, a total of four conditional<br />

probability statements are needed to uniquely define the dependence of / on T and S. These<br />

values are shown in boxes attached to each node in Figure 15.1. At this point, the a priori<br />

distribution for the node T needs to be provided for the network to be completely defined.<br />

As a starting point, assume a noninformative prior, assigning 0.5 for the two possible states.<br />

An observation about the indicator reading is presented to the network via instantiation of<br />

the node /. Given this evidence, the network updates its beliefs about the other two nodes, S<br />

and T. For example, if the indicator is observed to be red, the probability of the temperature<br />

being high increases from 50% to 82.5%. Beliefs about node S remain unchanged, due to<br />

the noninformative prior. The calculations showing the propagation of probabilities in the<br />

network and the resultant inference about the status of the sensor are shown in detail below.<br />

Initialization. The objective of this stage is to initialize the BBN such that the network<br />

becomes ready to accept evidence. Probabilities for all nodes and all n and A. messages are<br />

initialized for this purpose.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!