Fifth Year Maintenance Report - University of Minnesota
Fifth Year Maintenance Report - University of Minnesota
Fifth Year Maintenance Report - University of Minnesota
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
TABLE 3. BBA PROGRAM LEARNING GOALS ASSESSMENT<br />
Learning Goals<br />
Measurement/<br />
Methodology<br />
Date Last<br />
Measured<br />
BBA Program Learning Goals Assessment<br />
Results<br />
Changes needed in the assessment<br />
measurement<br />
Other changes<br />
needed (program,<br />
course)<br />
How changes were<br />
implemented<br />
CATEGORY: DEVELOP AND ENHANCE CORE SKILLS<br />
1. Communicate<br />
ideas effectively<br />
in written<br />
& oral form<br />
Message writing pre-test/posttest,<br />
measured along nine key<br />
dimensions <strong>of</strong> writing skills in<br />
FMIS 3141 (Business Communications).<br />
Oral skills –<br />
Fall 2005<br />
Written<br />
skills –<br />
Spring 2006<br />
In eight items, the posttest<br />
results are higher<br />
than pre-test results (the<br />
one that went down<br />
slightly was for ―correctness<br />
in names, dates, figures,<br />
and other facts.‖).<br />
Continue to administer a message-writing<br />
pre-test/post-test.<br />
Eliminate the current writing mechanics<br />
test. Instead, develop a<br />
10-item multiple choice test that<br />
could be administered separately<br />
as a pre-test and be incorporated<br />
into the final exam as a post-test.<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the items could address<br />
writing mechanics; others could<br />
address important content elements<br />
<strong>of</strong> written, oral and interpersonal<br />
communication. Begin<br />
to research methods by which<br />
oral communication could be assessed<br />
apart from questions included<br />
in a multiple choice test.<br />
Continue to include<br />
grammar/punctuation<br />
(writing mechanics)<br />
as course element;<br />
review commonly<br />
made errors<br />
early in course; integrate<br />
review <strong>of</strong> and<br />
exercises using these<br />
and other elements<br />
throughout the<br />
course; continue to<br />
evaluate students’<br />
work for content,<br />
structure, and mechanics.<br />
A new assessment<br />
instrument has been<br />
developed by the faculty<br />
teaching Business<br />
Communication.<br />
The new instrument<br />
was utilized in Fall<br />
Semester 2008 and<br />
results will be made<br />
available early in<br />
Spring Semester<br />
2009. There is ongoing<br />
monitoring and<br />
discussion among faculty<br />
teaching Business<br />
Communication<br />
regarding both content<br />
and assessment<br />
instrument. These<br />
discussions did not<br />
occur prior to assessment<br />
activities<br />
associated with Assurance<br />
<strong>of</strong> Learning<br />
standards.<br />
5-minute oral presentations in<br />
FMIS 3141 (Business Communications).<br />
Assessment tool<br />
used was an 11-criteria instrument.<br />
Spring 2008<br />
No student’s presentation<br />
was evaluated as unacceptable.<br />
9 <strong>of</strong> the 11 criteria<br />
were deemed to be<br />
satisfactorily met (more<br />
than 70% rated acceptable).<br />
However, 2 criteria<br />
were rated unsatisfactory.<br />
The first was the criteria<br />
for ―Transitions‖ (simply<br />
stated, students moved<br />
from slide to slide in PowerPoint<br />
without using<br />
oral transitions). The<br />
second was the criteria for<br />
―Confidence‖ (hands<br />
__<br />
20<br />
It was recommended that ―Attitude‖<br />
be added as a criterion in<br />
the next round <strong>of</strong> oral communication<br />
assessments.<br />
―Transitions‖ should<br />
be given more time<br />
for discussion in both<br />
the written and oral<br />
communication segments<br />
<strong>of</strong> FMIS 3141.<br />
A discussion with<br />
students should occur<br />
about the way in<br />
which individual factors<br />
contribute to the<br />
overall perceived<br />
level <strong>of</strong> ―Confidence‖<br />
and more detailed<br />
feedback should be<br />
The discussion with<br />
students about the<br />
way in which individual<br />
factors contribute<br />
to the overall perceived<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> ―Confidence‖<br />
occurred in<br />
Fall 2008.