02.09.2015 Views

Fifth Year Maintenance Report - University of Minnesota

Fifth Year Maintenance Report - University of Minnesota

Fifth Year Maintenance Report - University of Minnesota

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TABLE 3. BBA PROGRAM LEARNING GOALS ASSESSMENT<br />

Learning Goals<br />

Measurement/<br />

Methodology<br />

Date Last<br />

Measured<br />

BBA Program Learning Goals Assessment<br />

Results<br />

Changes needed in the assessment<br />

measurement<br />

Other changes<br />

needed (program,<br />

course)<br />

How changes were<br />

implemented<br />

CATEGORY: DEVELOP AND ENHANCE CORE SKILLS<br />

1. Communicate<br />

ideas effectively<br />

in written<br />

& oral form<br />

Message writing pre-test/posttest,<br />

measured along nine key<br />

dimensions <strong>of</strong> writing skills in<br />

FMIS 3141 (Business Communications).<br />

Oral skills –<br />

Fall 2005<br />

Written<br />

skills –<br />

Spring 2006<br />

In eight items, the posttest<br />

results are higher<br />

than pre-test results (the<br />

one that went down<br />

slightly was for ―correctness<br />

in names, dates, figures,<br />

and other facts.‖).<br />

Continue to administer a message-writing<br />

pre-test/post-test.<br />

Eliminate the current writing mechanics<br />

test. Instead, develop a<br />

10-item multiple choice test that<br />

could be administered separately<br />

as a pre-test and be incorporated<br />

into the final exam as a post-test.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the items could address<br />

writing mechanics; others could<br />

address important content elements<br />

<strong>of</strong> written, oral and interpersonal<br />

communication. Begin<br />

to research methods by which<br />

oral communication could be assessed<br />

apart from questions included<br />

in a multiple choice test.<br />

Continue to include<br />

grammar/punctuation<br />

(writing mechanics)<br />

as course element;<br />

review commonly<br />

made errors<br />

early in course; integrate<br />

review <strong>of</strong> and<br />

exercises using these<br />

and other elements<br />

throughout the<br />

course; continue to<br />

evaluate students’<br />

work for content,<br />

structure, and mechanics.<br />

A new assessment<br />

instrument has been<br />

developed by the faculty<br />

teaching Business<br />

Communication.<br />

The new instrument<br />

was utilized in Fall<br />

Semester 2008 and<br />

results will be made<br />

available early in<br />

Spring Semester<br />

2009. There is ongoing<br />

monitoring and<br />

discussion among faculty<br />

teaching Business<br />

Communication<br />

regarding both content<br />

and assessment<br />

instrument. These<br />

discussions did not<br />

occur prior to assessment<br />

activities<br />

associated with Assurance<br />

<strong>of</strong> Learning<br />

standards.<br />

5-minute oral presentations in<br />

FMIS 3141 (Business Communications).<br />

Assessment tool<br />

used was an 11-criteria instrument.<br />

Spring 2008<br />

No student’s presentation<br />

was evaluated as unacceptable.<br />

9 <strong>of</strong> the 11 criteria<br />

were deemed to be<br />

satisfactorily met (more<br />

than 70% rated acceptable).<br />

However, 2 criteria<br />

were rated unsatisfactory.<br />

The first was the criteria<br />

for ―Transitions‖ (simply<br />

stated, students moved<br />

from slide to slide in PowerPoint<br />

without using<br />

oral transitions). The<br />

second was the criteria for<br />

―Confidence‖ (hands<br />

__<br />

20<br />

It was recommended that ―Attitude‖<br />

be added as a criterion in<br />

the next round <strong>of</strong> oral communication<br />

assessments.<br />

―Transitions‖ should<br />

be given more time<br />

for discussion in both<br />

the written and oral<br />

communication segments<br />

<strong>of</strong> FMIS 3141.<br />

A discussion with<br />

students should occur<br />

about the way in<br />

which individual factors<br />

contribute to the<br />

overall perceived<br />

level <strong>of</strong> ―Confidence‖<br />

and more detailed<br />

feedback should be<br />

The discussion with<br />

students about the<br />

way in which individual<br />

factors contribute<br />

to the overall perceived<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> ―Confidence‖<br />

occurred in<br />

Fall 2008.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!