Fifth Year Maintenance Report - University of Minnesota
Fifth Year Maintenance Report - University of Minnesota
Fifth Year Maintenance Report - University of Minnesota
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Learning Goals<br />
Measurement/<br />
Methodology<br />
Date Last<br />
Measured<br />
BBA Program Learning Goals Assessment<br />
Results<br />
Changes needed in the assessment<br />
measurement<br />
Other changes<br />
needed (program,<br />
course)<br />
How changes were<br />
implemented<br />
CATEGORY: DEVELOP MANAGEMENT-SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS<br />
3601. In the 2007 analysis,<br />
the question dealing with the<br />
time value <strong>of</strong> money showed<br />
considerable improvement in<br />
the post-test compared to the<br />
pre-test, while the question<br />
dealing with stock and bond<br />
valuation showed very little improvement.<br />
1c. Acquire<br />
knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />
the core areas<br />
<strong>of</strong> business:<br />
Human Resources<br />
Pre-test/post-test <strong>of</strong> key constructs<br />
in MGTS 3801 (Human<br />
Resource Management)<br />
Fall 2007<br />
Three <strong>of</strong> the four targets<br />
were met. The only item<br />
that was not met was that<br />
the pre-test pooled mean<br />
score was not 50% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
students answered correctly in<br />
the pre-test. The faculty agreed<br />
that these items should be reviewed<br />
before the next round <strong>of</strong><br />
assessment–2010. Since the<br />
test has only been administered<br />
once, the HR faculty has agreed<br />
to administer the test again before<br />
the 2010 assessment period<br />
to determine the stability <strong>of</strong> the<br />
test. If, after the 2 nd administration,<br />
it appears that these items<br />
need modification, they will be<br />
made before the 2010 assessment<br />
period<br />
prior knowledge (pretest)<br />
and the extent<br />
<strong>of</strong> eventual improvement<br />
(post-test) as<br />
suggested by the initial<br />
assessment results.<br />
Therefore, they<br />
decided there was no<br />
need to alter the allocation<br />
<strong>of</strong> class time<br />
among topics in FMIS<br />
3601.<br />
There were three<br />
questions that had<br />
post-test scores below<br />
the target <strong>of</strong> 70%.<br />
However, since the<br />
post-test scores on<br />
these three questions<br />
were fairly close to<br />
the 70% target, the<br />
HR faculty decided to<br />
increase curricular<br />
emphasis on these<br />
points, but not to engage<br />
in large scale<br />
changes in the curriculum<br />
as a result <strong>of</strong><br />
these findings.<br />
The proposed<br />
changes needed in<br />
the assessment measurement<br />
will occur<br />
prior to the next assessment<br />
iteration,<br />
scheduled for Fall<br />
Semester 2010. This<br />
new instrument will<br />
be pre-tested during<br />
Fall Semester 2009.<br />
There is ongoing<br />
monitoring and discussion<br />
among faculty<br />
teaching Human<br />
Resource Management<br />
regarding both<br />
content and assessment<br />
instrument.<br />
These discussions did<br />
not occur prior to assessment<br />
activities<br />
associated with Assurance<br />
<strong>of</strong> Learning<br />
standards.<br />
1d. Acquire<br />
knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />
the core areas<br />
<strong>of</strong> Business:<br />
Production and<br />
Operations<br />
Pre-test/post-test <strong>of</strong> key constructs<br />
in FMIS 3301 (Production<br />
and Operations Management)<br />
Fall 2006<br />
Only one <strong>of</strong> the four targets<br />
were met (the pretest<br />
pooled mean score<br />
was less than 5).<br />
The instructors <strong>of</strong> FMIS 3301 involved<br />
in this assessment activity<br />
identified some areas <strong>of</strong> concern<br />
with respect to the test instruments<br />
which was used. They<br />
found that five questions on the<br />
There was meaningful<br />
discussion regarding<br />
the course content<br />
material and the<br />
means, if any, by<br />
which the course con-<br />
The faculty members<br />
teaching Production<br />
and Operations Management<br />
developed a<br />
revised assessment<br />
instrument. The in-<br />
__<br />
28