02.09.2015 Views

Fifth Year Maintenance Report - University of Minnesota

Fifth Year Maintenance Report - University of Minnesota

Fifth Year Maintenance Report - University of Minnesota

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Learning Goals<br />

Measurement/<br />

Methodology<br />

Date Last<br />

Measured<br />

BBA Program Learning Goals Assessment<br />

Results<br />

Changes needed in the assessment<br />

measurement<br />

Other changes<br />

needed (program,<br />

course)<br />

How changes were<br />

implemented<br />

CATEGORY: DEVELOP MANAGEMENT-SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS<br />

3601. In the 2007 analysis,<br />

the question dealing with the<br />

time value <strong>of</strong> money showed<br />

considerable improvement in<br />

the post-test compared to the<br />

pre-test, while the question<br />

dealing with stock and bond<br />

valuation showed very little improvement.<br />

1c. Acquire<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />

the core areas<br />

<strong>of</strong> business:<br />

Human Resources<br />

Pre-test/post-test <strong>of</strong> key constructs<br />

in MGTS 3801 (Human<br />

Resource Management)<br />

Fall 2007<br />

Three <strong>of</strong> the four targets<br />

were met. The only item<br />

that was not met was that<br />

the pre-test pooled mean<br />

score was not 50% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

students answered correctly in<br />

the pre-test. The faculty agreed<br />

that these items should be reviewed<br />

before the next round <strong>of</strong><br />

assessment–2010. Since the<br />

test has only been administered<br />

once, the HR faculty has agreed<br />

to administer the test again before<br />

the 2010 assessment period<br />

to determine the stability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

test. If, after the 2 nd administration,<br />

it appears that these items<br />

need modification, they will be<br />

made before the 2010 assessment<br />

period<br />

prior knowledge (pretest)<br />

and the extent<br />

<strong>of</strong> eventual improvement<br />

(post-test) as<br />

suggested by the initial<br />

assessment results.<br />

Therefore, they<br />

decided there was no<br />

need to alter the allocation<br />

<strong>of</strong> class time<br />

among topics in FMIS<br />

3601.<br />

There were three<br />

questions that had<br />

post-test scores below<br />

the target <strong>of</strong> 70%.<br />

However, since the<br />

post-test scores on<br />

these three questions<br />

were fairly close to<br />

the 70% target, the<br />

HR faculty decided to<br />

increase curricular<br />

emphasis on these<br />

points, but not to engage<br />

in large scale<br />

changes in the curriculum<br />

as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

these findings.<br />

The proposed<br />

changes needed in<br />

the assessment measurement<br />

will occur<br />

prior to the next assessment<br />

iteration,<br />

scheduled for Fall<br />

Semester 2010. This<br />

new instrument will<br />

be pre-tested during<br />

Fall Semester 2009.<br />

There is ongoing<br />

monitoring and discussion<br />

among faculty<br />

teaching Human<br />

Resource Management<br />

regarding both<br />

content and assessment<br />

instrument.<br />

These discussions did<br />

not occur prior to assessment<br />

activities<br />

associated with Assurance<br />

<strong>of</strong> Learning<br />

standards.<br />

1d. Acquire<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />

the core areas<br />

<strong>of</strong> Business:<br />

Production and<br />

Operations<br />

Pre-test/post-test <strong>of</strong> key constructs<br />

in FMIS 3301 (Production<br />

and Operations Management)<br />

Fall 2006<br />

Only one <strong>of</strong> the four targets<br />

were met (the pretest<br />

pooled mean score<br />

was less than 5).<br />

The instructors <strong>of</strong> FMIS 3301 involved<br />

in this assessment activity<br />

identified some areas <strong>of</strong> concern<br />

with respect to the test instruments<br />

which was used. They<br />

found that five questions on the<br />

There was meaningful<br />

discussion regarding<br />

the course content<br />

material and the<br />

means, if any, by<br />

which the course con-<br />

The faculty members<br />

teaching Production<br />

and Operations Management<br />

developed a<br />

revised assessment<br />

instrument. The in-<br />

__<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!