06.12.2012 Views

Evidence-base - International Diabetes Federation

Evidence-base - International Diabetes Federation

Evidence-base - International Diabetes Federation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Global Guideline for Type 2 <strong>Diabetes</strong><br />

12<br />

There are several options for strategies to screen for undiagnosed diabetes.<br />

The ultimate choice is <strong>base</strong>d on available resources and a trade-off between<br />

sensitivity (the proportion of people with diabetes who test positive on the<br />

screening test), specificity (the proportion of people who do not have diabetes<br />

who test negative on the screening test), and the proportion of the population<br />

with a positive screening test which needs to proceed to diagnostic testing.<br />

Most screening strategies include risk assessment and measurement of<br />

glycaemia, performed either sequentially or simultaneously. There are many<br />

risk assessment methods and scores but applicability of many is limited<br />

because they require tests not routinely available [10] . One commonly used risk<br />

score is FINDRISK [11] . This diabetes risk score is a simple, fast, inexpensive,<br />

noninvasive, and reliable tool to identify individuals at high risk for type 2<br />

diabetes. It was developed from a large random population sample of individuals<br />

with no antidiabetic medication at <strong>base</strong>line and who were followed for 10<br />

years. It requires age, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, history of<br />

antihypertensive drug treatment and high blood glucose, physical activity, and<br />

daily consumption of fruits, berries, or vegetables to calculate risk.<br />

Screening tests are followed by diagnostic tests in order to make the<br />

diagnosis [1,12] . Combined screening strategies have a sensitivity and specificity<br />

in the order of 75%, and 25% of the population require diagnostic testing. People<br />

who screen negative should be re-tested after 3-5 years. These people should<br />

also be offered lifestyle advice to minimise their risk of developing diabetes.<br />

Although the usefulness of urine glucose as a screening test for undiagnosed<br />

diabetes is limited because of low sensitivity (21-64%) [12] , specificity is high<br />

(> 98%), so it may have a place in low-resource settings where other procedures<br />

are not available.<br />

Following a positive screening test, diagnostic testing is required. The WHO now<br />

recommends three options for diagnosing diabetes [13,14] :<br />

- FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/l (≥ 126 mg/dl) or,<br />

- 75 g OGTT with FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/l (126 mg/dl) and / or 2 hour plasma glucose<br />

≥ 11.1 mmol/l (200 mg/dl) or,<br />

- HbA 1c ≥ 6.5% / 48 mmol/mol.<br />

In asymptomatic individuals with a single abnormal test, the abnormal test<br />

should be repeated to confirm the diagnosis unless the result is unequivocally<br />

elevated.<br />

In the presence of classical diabetes symptoms, diabetes can be diagnosed on<br />

the basis of a random plasma glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/l (200 mg/dl).<br />

Consideration<br />

The place of screening for undiagnosed diabetes as part of an overall<br />

strategy to reduce the health burden of diabetes is not established. However,<br />

many organisations recommend it. The choice of whether to screen or not,<br />

and the screening strategy, must be made locally taking into account local<br />

considerations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!