CAP 763
CAP 763 Aviation Safety Review - Contact Us
CAP 763 Aviation Safety Review - Contact Us
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>CAP</strong> <strong>763</strong> Aviation Safety Review 2005<br />
UK Airspace and Aerodromes - Airprox<br />
500<br />
450<br />
400<br />
Not involving loss of separation<br />
Involving loss of separation<br />
Number of level busts<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
Figure 6.8<br />
Level busts in UK airspace<br />
3.9.3 It should be noted that there are a number of level busts in this section that resulted<br />
in an Airprox. However, as the figures are small (only 5% of the total) these Airprox/<br />
level bust occurrences have been kept in the dataset.<br />
3.10 Other types of ATC occurrences<br />
3.10.1 Apart from runway incursions and level busts there are other significant types of ATC<br />
occurrence, as shown in Table 6.6. It should be noted that these occurrences are not<br />
necessarily mutually exclusive, e.g. a loss of separation could arise from a call sign<br />
confusion incident. These occurrences involved at least one civil aircraft.<br />
Occurrence Type 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Total<br />
ATS Engineering/<br />
Equipment<br />
304 420 512 432 529 592 555 826 587 560 5317<br />
Call-sign Confusion 91 90 182 147 105 96 83 108 137 106 1145<br />
Infringements 240 282 348 270 350 303 273 350 419 405 3240<br />
Loss of Separation 176 223 241 257 270 274 208 223 198 246 2316<br />
Table 6.6<br />
Other significant ATC occurrences<br />
4 Airprox in UK Airspace<br />
4.1 The definition of an Airprox is a situation in which, in the opinion of a pilot or controller,<br />
the distance between aircraft as well as their relative positions and speed was such<br />
that the safety of the aircraft involved was or may have been compromised.<br />
4.2 Airprox within UK airspace are reviewed separately by the UK Airprox Board (UKAB)<br />
which is an independent organisation sponsored jointly by the CAA and the MOD.<br />
UKAB determine what happened in each Airprox, assess the risk level involved and<br />
make Safety Recommendations, where appropriate, to reduce the risk of recurrence<br />
of such incidents.<br />
8 August 2006<br />
Chapter 6 Page 9